Aftervote vs. Mahalo

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:

Dave Naylor has fired a shot across Mahalo’s bow this morning.  Aftervote is similar to Mahalo insofar as it is a search engine whose SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages) have a social influence component.

Dave claims Aftervote is inherently superior  however for a number of reasons including:

They have a few editors, we have 1000’s

If Aftervotes doesn’t have SERPs for a query, it defaults to meta search not only Google

Aftervotes offers a unique voting power wherein users can vote a site up or down with the click of a button

There is a radar logo by each result that is color coded to give you some info on it’s popularity;

Blue means one of your friends voted on the site
Red means someone in your ‘group’ voted for it
Black means that a listing is the consensus best choice

The size of the colored radar logo is indicative of the general popularity of the site.

I think using social data to influence SERPs is an interesting and logical innovation to add to the idea of ‘search’.  However, I do think it has to be carefully and cautiously implemented.  As we’ve seen illustrated lots of times with sites like Digg and del.icio.us there exists the potential of a pronounced downside on relying on ‘everyone’ for relevant information.

Aftervote vs. Mahalo
Comments Off
This entry was posted in Uncategorized.
About Mike McDonald
Mike has been covering ebusiness and the search industry for WebProNews since 2000. Follow me on Twitter! WebProNews Writer
Top Rated White Papers and Resources

Comments are closed.

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter