Spitzer Checking Digital Music Collusion
Despite being competitors in the music industry, the big music labels had “most favored nation” terms inserted into contracts with digital music distributors.
Under those terms, the LA Times reported, there was no true competition between the music labels. If one got a better price for music, they all got the same price.
It’s a business practice that attracted the attention of New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, who sent subpoenas in lieu of greeting cards to the labels last year. His office has not yet commented about the Times report, but sources close to the investigation said it was the money guarantees that his office is examining.
The Times featured one quote from an unnamed industry executive, who said the labels only have the best interests of the artists at heart:
Other unnamed executives said the most-favored nation clauses were “common in contracts” for distributing digital music online. Further, some contracts compelled the online services to spend the same amount of marketing money on promoting songs regardless of their owning label.
An interesting portion of the Times report cited the growing power of online distributors, namely Yahoo, which has apparently taken a stand against one label in a money dispute:
Email the author here.
David Utter is a staff writer for WebProNews covering technology and business.