Quantcast
750×100
Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Google Offers Inbound Link Advice

Want links? Google says be interesting

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:

Google’s Maile Ohye concluded Link Week with a tutorial on inbound links. It says basically what SEO experts have been saying for years: content and inbound links are most important, and in that order.
Google Offers Inbound Link Advice
Just because it’s old news doesn’t mean it’s bad news. Google’s had a real history of silence on the SEO side of things, and experts were often left to theorize and test—and worse, try to game. Google sent a pretty loud signal this time last year by hitting the PageRanks of paid directories, a move seeming to confirm basic white-hat SEO tactics.

In her post, Ohye extols the virtues of naturally gained, editorial inbound links and directly denounces links appear “spammy,” or not “merit-based.”

“One of the strongest ranking factors is my site’s content. Additionally, perhaps my site is also linked from three sources — however, one inbound link is from a spammy site. As far as Google is concerned, we want only the two quality inbound links to contribute to the PageRank signal in our ranking.

"Given the user’s query, over 200 signals (including the analysis of the site’s content and inbound links as mentioned above) are applied to return the most relevant results to the user.”

Ohye then offered four bullet points on how to earn merit-based links, paraphrased below:

  • Start a site-related blog, writing or video, research or entertainment.
  •  Be interesting. Be a teacher. (Hey, that should be a recruitment slogan for a College of Education somewhere! I’ll sell it to ya for the bargain price of $500,000—if a private school, just $10,000, since as a non-government institution you can’t just print the money you need.)
  • Participate in the community surrounding your industry—social media, blog comments, user reviews.
  • Provide useful products or services.

In short: content, content, content, a little participation, and the links will come. 

 

Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 79 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. Vey true, but nothing that hasn’t been said before. I don’t like the idea of one spammy link being too detrimental. It would be easy for a competitor to sabbotage someone elses site.

    Reply
    • Like (0) Dislike (0)
      Guest

      GRAF’S ATA MARTIAL ARTS ACADEMY in South Austin, Texas has been providing Martial Art instruction to the South Austin community for over 20 years.  Graf’s ATA Martial Arts Academy provides a safe and family-oriented experience for students of all ages and abilities.

       

      Reply
  2. Personally I don’t think they can or do penalize too heavily for a semi-spammy link since it would be far to easy to negative-SEO your competitors.  I think it’s just that a lot of weight isn’t given to the link, but it’s still indexed. Sort of like nofollow. Sure they say they don’t follow them, but a quick query shows that to be false.

    I’m still trying to figure out why they give more "authority" to links from some sites and less to others even if they have the same topic and PR. I think that’s just one of the hidden gears of G’s algorithms.

    Reply
    • Like (0) Dislike (0)
      SEO

      Because Google looks at a lot more than just the sites that links to your sites topic and PR, they consider among many other things… amount and quality of in and outbound links, the simularity of all links, location of the link within the pages content, the anchor text and relavency to page content and the target page content…. etc ect ect. ;)  

      Reply
  3. Further buttresses the point that no one can "fully" understand Google’s ranking algorithm. Personally, I think it’s a good idea to focus more on content though as i have seen a PR2 page outrank a PR5 page for most of the related keywords. Content is still King

    I can’t help wondering why googlebot follows links on pages with the nofollow attribute.

    Reply
    • Like (0) Dislike (0)
      SEO

      The nofollow attribute value is not meant for blocking access to content or preventing content to be indexed by search engines.

      The nofollow attribute is used to instruct Google that a link should not influence the link target’s ranking – I.E. so it doesnt pass PageRank to target site.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow

      Stuart, SEO Chester UK.

      Reply
      • Like (0) Dislike (0)
        srllemo

        I can agree that nofollow attribute tells google that there is no need to follow a link with nofollow attribute, and google have recomendation on their pages that advertising links need to have this attribute, and google offering advertising web sites this way as proper way to advertise other sites without influencing their ranking with this kind of link.

        But if you specify nofollow attribute in robots meta tags in that case google do not index such a page. This is one of few ways to exclude some page from google indexing.

        Reply
  4. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Guest

    I have always felt that good content consistently applied is the greatest thing you can do for your site .. good article.

     

    Schools for Cooking

    Reply
  5.  Yep, the content has always been the most important, so this makes perfect sense. The best content always gets tons of backlinks.

    Reply
  6. This goes to support and confirm what we already knew – Content is king.

    Though both inbound and outbound links do help, but its important to have a rich content with relevant keywords if one wants to improve their ranking organically. Again, always avoid those spammy link building sites.

    Reply
  7. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    usman

    thanks for list

    Reply
  8. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Guest

    Writing to blogs is a more civil way of spam. You do not need to be original in the blog, as the ultimate purpose is to get the back link. Again a black SEO technique which is termed white.

    Reply
  9. I maintain a business web site http://www.glenrgraham.com which links to my informational and educational blog at http://www.oklahomacriminaldefense.blogspot.com and I communicate actively with the best criminal defense lawyers in the nation on their blogs and I am active in our local Tulsa criminal defense lawyers and member of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL).   I agree that content is king and that blogging is a natural way of gaining and increasing rank in the bloggersphere.

    Reply
  10. Most blogs I read are much more spammy than content.  I’m just as bad as the rest.  I have 6 blogs and only one on them is just good, honest content.  How in the world does google determine the good content blogs from the out n out spammy ones?  Especially if they are just being crawled and not read. 

    Reply
  11. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Habil

    What if you run a blog or a site in a very niche market? When you have written pretty much everything there is to say without getting too technical what do you do then?

    Try to figure out how to write similar post just to keep the blog alive? Getting technical?

    /Habil

    Reply
  12. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    pandita

    William Callaway is right !

    So much has been written about rich content and blogs. But how does Google identify which is original and right. This articles, is in fact, creating more room for discussions.

    Reply
    • Like (0) Dislike (0)
      Guest

      What is content? I run a very small on-line shop, with lots of products, except for the normal about, contact, returns, privacy, etc. I don’t have, or need anytyhing else for my commercial site. I don’t have time to write nonsense.

      Reply
      • Like (0) Dislike (0)
        Danny

        Writing content for it to be SEO worthy doesn’t mean writing nonsense.

        Good content would be something useful and informative to readers so perhaps you could write some useful things about the products you sell (i.e. how to maximise battery life span if you sell batteries or tips on how to take care of your law mower if you sell law mowers, and so on).

        Reply
        • Like (0) Dislike (0)
          mitchmatch

          was there a limit or prescribe number of words per page/content in a page?

          Reply
  13. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Guest

    I tought external links were most important.

    Reply
    • Like (0) Dislike (0)
      Guest

      Yes, what is an inbound link? If you need to have your site on other site’s pages,
      I would think that’s outbound link. By listing your site on a number of search engines, malls, do you get higher listing on Google? Listing on FFA pages is getting inbound links? If you do that, how long before you get noticed by Google?

      Reply
    • As more and more people abuse the system with blackhat tricks to get backlinks, contents seem more important now.

      Reply
  14. It is easy for me to understand Google saying that.  They are certainly interested in provide relevant results, accurate information and the like. The problem is that the index is FULL of sites with horrible content that are ranked high due to link building.

    I would agree that content is critical, especially for conversion, but anyone that says good content is required to get ranked in Google is living in a dream world.

    Reply
  15. Let’s not forget that Google is, after all a robot … albeit a sophiticated one.  So while its ability to apply some formula to the words on a page (or indeed from referring pages) I for one don’t accept Google’s capacity to determine what is interesting or informative.  That’s an individual and subjective thing.

    Reply
  16. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Nice

    but the worst thing in this story is that there will never be a starting point when those priciples will be applied ..

    There will always be a unknown factor..or factors…there will always be someone who gain and someone to loose in the same time ..even if they play the same game, the same rules.

     

    Reply
  17. Jalza Graphics and Web Development has outstanding Graphics, Flash Animations, Logos, and Banners. Not only that but we develop web sites and we design web sites as well. check us out at http://www.jalza.net. we might just be what you are looking for. You never know! Email us at info@jalza.net

    Reply
    • Like (0) Dislike (0)
      mitchmatch

      that’s one reason i can see why Google decided to ignore "links" somehow, becuase of irrelevancy. (evil grin)

      Reply
  18. Googgle try to protect their business. If they are not penalize paid listing may be google going to end. Becuase SERP contain unwant result to user. They move to Yahoo or Live.

    So we must folow google rule.

    Reply
  19. I have found link-building to be tough and time-consuming. But I am making slow progress. However, my main task will always be providing good, fresh content. Does anybody know why Google doesn’t reflect links the way the others such as Yahoo does? If you do a search for links to your site, the sites Yahoo lists are way above what Google lists.

    Reply
  20. How about links from local directories – are they considered low-quality links as well then?

    Reply
  21. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Guest

    Google is a mystery no one knows for sure how its algorithm works, probably just few individuals at the helm. So it is better to stick to the basics as being adviced and it is not advisable to ‘fight the system out’ to win mother Google.

    Thanks for the nice articles though.

    Reply
  22. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Guest

    An inbound link is a link from another source that comes into your website which in turn can help your rankings if its relevant.Ideally inbound links need to be two things

    Ideally inbound links need to be two things:

    1) From a related site: A dog food company linking to a solicitors website is no good, the linking site needs to be of related content.

    2) From a well connected site: Sites linking to your site also need to be perceived as important by search engines.

    http://www.4psmarketing.com/pr-and-link-building

    Reply
  23. Well folks, what i think from my prespective what google does is almost fine as the concept of paid directories, paid links are not natural links. It is one type of shortcuts to the achieve top links.

    I can ask questions here:

    What if All try for Paid links, directories etc,,,,, then would there be any natural links?

    What about content if i directly buy thousands of links? I don’t even need a quality content instead my paid links would do it for me,,,,,

     

    So due to such reasons Google would not prefer such type of links.

    Its like this Natural optimization = Natual Content + Natural links

    Some say blogging is spamming but what i would suggest is that if ur doing blogging to get a backlink with natural efforts then it won’t be a spam, as google itself knows that we need to build links as it algo is based on trustworthy links.

    LINKS: 

    •   Quality of links
    •   Quantity of links
    •   Rated Natural Links

     

    "Its like this slow and steady wins the race"

    Reply
  24. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    webmilenia

    sounds great….

    Reply
  25. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Lenen

    While the bullet points might work for most of the blogs/news sites it doesn’t apply for small niche static websites. In these niches nobody links to each other for free.

    Reply
  26. This is nothing new in this story. 

    For me:

    •   Quality of links 40% important (1)
    •   Quantity of links 20% important (3)
    •   Rated Natural Links 40% important (2)

     

     

     

     

     

    Reply
  27. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    paul




    With Google tinkering with the results so frequently – many of my searches now pull up these SOE blogs – which actually while having a lot of content don’t actually give any meaningful information – guess that’s why a robot likes them?

    Most searches I do on Google – I now immediately jump to page 6+ of the results and start seeing the content that I was searching for – if that doesn’t work I’ll try another search engine until I find one optimised for my query.

    The increasingly less relevant results Google are returning for these SEO blogs is a sure sign the SEO’s are winning and they are managing to fool Google into listing their pages first – I guess if it continues like this people will gradually keep moving from Google – wonder what next year’s favourite will be?

    Reply
  28. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Dise

    I agree with Adam, with this would be easy for a competitor to sabbotage. Useful list mate. Really fresh, unique and quality content is the king.

    Reply
  29. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Social Man

    No offence but this is a very old looking website Albert. I suggest a radical redesign and you might see a difference.

    Reply
  30. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Dan

    is the answer to everything these days…

    Reply
  31. There’s nothing more important than those quality inbound links – that’s is what I’ve always believed. It’s refreshing and interesting that the ‘G’ has finally acknowldged it too.

    Nice one!

    Reply
  32. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Free Head

    The fact remains that google’s original backrub algorithm took inbound links very seriously, in fact 80% seriously. However, in recent years they have introduced many filters which reduce the rank of sites which appear to have built inbound links unnaturally. I agree with the above statements, but think that there is no reason not to engage in a SEO link building strategy as long as your links are theme based, and not posted on a million off topic blogs or web directories. Happy link building!

    Reply
  33. what about the plethora of SEO companies out there?? They base half their income on residual link building strategies! Surely this will only add to their stress?

    Reply
  34. This is great info. However, I heard that right now it’s safe not to be to aggressive on one’s link campaign to avoid lots of link farms linking to your site. If the linking site so happens to get banned, then maybe you could be affected.

    Reply
  35. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Guest

    Write about something exciting! So many people forget that content is still the number one importnat aspect. SEO is fine and dandy but at the end of the day you want repeat visitors, not a bunch of traffic with high bounce rates.

    Reply
    • i agree with you. we must still to think about searcher point of view. the benefit of search engine is to direct a searcher to desire content. so we still must focus on content first before doing link building

      Reply
  36. "The fact remains that google’s original backrub algorithm took inbound links very seriously, in fact 80% seriously. However, in recent years they have introduced many filters which reduce the rank of sites which appear to have built inbound links unnaturally."

    Yes these "bandaid filters" have been added over and voer as new spam techniques come up.  Algo is pretty much the same as it always have been I susupect, but the filtering is what has changed it so dramatically.

    Reply
  37. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Filipino

    I new to SEO, How do i quantify good and relevant content?

    Reply
  38. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Gambler

    Nobody links to each other for free anymore. They all want a link back or get paid for providing a link to your website.

    Reply
  39. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    ???? ???????

    that’s one reason i can see why Google decided to ignore "links" somehow, becuase of irrelevancy. (evil grin

    Reply
  40. I know how to get links and increase in google ranking, but how do you get more recognized links that when you type in link:www.YourSite.com are listed?

    Reply
  41. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Dave

    thats just crazy talk, content important, but that means that you have to spend time on providing useful content not just sales crap….

    im sorry but this is the best article that has been written recently on the topic, a simple test for content would you link it to your company website if not then likely others wouldnt…

     

     

    Reply
  42. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Eric Fairon

    I totally agree that links are very important.

    But where is the news?

    We know it for a long time that quality links are the key.

    Reply
  43. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Tom Mulhall

    I have an interesting situation. My wife and I own a nudist resort in Palm Springs, California.

    Although the mainstream media has written a lot about our resort and we have been featured on TV many times, and we are one of the most popular resorts in Palm Springs, I have always found it very difficult to get sites such as travel sites, to link to us as they are "afraid" that conservative viewers will no longer visit their sites.

    Getting links when you have a "controversial" business is easier said than done.

    Reply
  44. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Talkways

    Hi, I am using Iframe on my site and google does not seems to be indexing it. What we can do to include iframe pages in to google search. You can view some at http://talkways.co.uk/phones.htm and let me know how to improve it.

    I found from my affiliates that we can use datafeed to get indexed but I guess it is too difficult for me to understand all that. Any help please let me know at

    info [AT] talkways [dot] co [dot ] uk

    Reply
  45. google count only dofollow link for link popularity, but yahoo count all link come from other websites. dofollow link is all link without rel="nofollow" tag.

    Reply
  46. Like (0) Dislike (0)
    Stan Brower

    Its always been that way, inbound links are most important and then comes content of the site, this has to be good too.

    Reply
  47. Who is going to link to a clothes line site? Mine is full of good content but has very few natural links to it. I rely on directories. Matt Cutts, ideology isnt perfect. Try and think about us and dont penalise directories so much.

    Reply
  48. content is most important because even if you have many links and good pagerank, people not to visit your site again if you do not have a worthy content.
    However, it is true what the people say in the comments, according to the type of page can be very difficult to get links except in directories

    Reply

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>