Read WebProNews
With Friends!

New Details on Google Caffeine Update

Exlusive Interview: Google's Matt Cutts gives us the latest on Caffeine

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 26 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. I those four factors ( When SEOBook’s Aaron Wall tested Caffeine, he said he thought there was…) are symptoms of Caffeine then I reckon that Google has been sipping Caffeine all Summer.
    Particularly the last – a cutting down of universal search results.

  2. This article was very interesting and important as well, we need to keep eye on new updates with any changed from google on their search result algorithm.

    Regards,

    WkListing.com

  3. sofakingdabest

    Thank you Matt for creating more SEO work. We will have to charge our clients to update the websites for the new algo. I like it – Google 2.0

  4. Google caffeine will be the better option with the better algorithm, especially with original content.

  5. ddhh1

    Im confused….. I thought Google had already rolled out Caffeine algorithm back in August?

    • Chris Crum

      They just announced it and put up the sandbox.

  6. Any change that advances real time search results has got to be for the better. Not just news sites but all sites/blogs that update regularly with fresh content will benefit. People that work the hardest maintaining their sites will reep the greatest rewards.

  7. Just been onto the sandbox and it’s all closed down. The rollout’s started and will be implemented on one of it’s datacentres. Going to be interesting as I recently did a search of the sandbox for IT-Green.co.uk and it’s near top of the first page for keywords “computer recycling“. Interestingly, this was a serious bump to the site, albeit the fact that i’d finally sorted out a 301 via google’s webmaster tools. Now I know there’s been some supposed issues with the 301 not being implemented on caffeine, but this search was only a week ago, so I would hope the new roll-out will have a great effect on us. The majority of our competition use third party website design companies to implement/ design their sites and carry out SEO, which means that a regular update to their sites would be a costly excercise, meaning that us in-house webmasters/ SEO’ers have a sudden advantage over the competition!!!! Interestingly, one thing I did note about the sandbox version was the implementation of a level of brand recognition. Typing in it-green into the search box brought up it-green.co.uk as the one and only drop-down suggestion. This as opposed to the fact that green IT is a recognised new industry! My suspicion is that Google’s put some thought into brand recognition as being an important factor in search results.

  8. With all the recent comments and concern – it would still seem that most people are still writing and designing websites for search engines and not humans at all. I dont think the truely big and important sites are worried about Caffeine update at all. Still it gives us something to write and winge about. ;)

  9. Guest

    Wow Matt really has a problem with the truth, it’s like he just can’t right out and say anything without lying about it first. Am I the only one who’s noticed this pattern?

    consider:
    First he says:
    “I know that webmasters can get anxious around this time of year, so I wanted to reassure site owners that the full Caffeine roll out will happen after the holidays,
    Then he says:
    “Caffeine will go live at one data center . . .”
    It’s always like this with him, except sometimes he just won’t say the second part. Or he’ll bury in a statement about something else. I swear sometimes it’s like listening to dick Cheney talk.

  10. From what i noticed with regards to my websites and its ranking in the new caffeine update, article sites and other web 2.0 properties which could rank well with long tail keywords have been devalued to quite an extent, niche sites targeting specific keywords are given more weightage, maybe due to the fact that those article/web 2.0 sites offer little or no less content, while niche sites will offer extensive and valuable content to visitors, after all the bottomline for google is providing content fresh and exhaustive to its visitors

  11. Guest

    I am amazed at how fast the indexing is now. Within 2-3 hours relevant sites seem indexed. And delivery seems faster too.

    Really impressive.

  12. Cutting down on Universal Search results would’ve had an impact on search speed – do you think this is the reason they have done it, or it may be to enable them to include more real time results in their place…. Or maybe a bit of both? Time will tell I suppose.

  13. Great information. You guys here must have some pretty good leads. Keeping up with Googles changes is difficult and the fact you guys can find out the inside scoop on Googles activities is amazing. Thanks for the updates and I will be looking for more.

  14. You think Google caffeine is fast? Next year they are probably going to launch Google Meth. Enough with the nicknames.

    On a serious note, I think Google is waiting to launch Caffeine after the holidays to avoid the screams, rants and complaints of how the index change destroyed their online businesses. Past stories abound in regards. At the end of the day Google and other major search engine players can always be counted on to do what in the best interests of their company and their stock holders. ~ sigh.

  15. SEOSally

    It just goes to show you we let Google get too big. If changing a simple search algorithm may destroy businesses as it appears Matt Cutts publicly stated when he said:

    “I wanted to reassure site owners that the full Caffeine roll out will happen after the holidays”

    You know we all made a mistake and we let Google get too big! That’s really sad…

  16. While SEOs can provide clients with valuable services, some unethical SEOs have given the industry a black eye through their overly aggressive marketing efforts and their attempts to manipulate search engine results in unfair ways.

  17. The Google had introduced the new web for their users.. This means that a small percentage of Google

  18. How can caffeine help wiht seo??

  19. hi, friends this is rahul saraswat from india.
    I have own a website i show or publish this website for the world entertainment in AUGUST.
    And i apply for google adds on my website but google not reply.
    please help me that how can i take adds from google.
    my website gets 100 pageviews per day average.
    please help me to get addvertise.
    pls pls pls reply me soon.

  20. Here in the UK Google looks different as of 23:00 today, 14th November. Caffeine?

    d

  21. One thing I’ve noticed over the last few days is that 10-boxes for maps.google results are popping far less often than they used to.

    Not sure if this is a maps.google cleanup situation or a more global caffeine issue.

    S

    • I’ve been getting some results which appear in a fraction of the time they normally do (0.12 seconds) which correlates with Caffeine being a lot faster, so I’m assuming that may be from the single data centre.

      I have found Google Maps results for local business just not appearing so often. Has anyone else found the same?

  22. And here’s why. Our site has been on the first page for the word sexshop for ages. Recently for a while on the 3rd place. From one day to the next our site was totally gone. Nowhere to be found in the first 400 results. Why this major change? I have no clue whatsoever. Do I think this is cafeine: Yes we do. Do we like this; no we don’t

    so that’s why Google sucks

  23. Dominik

    I have experienced huge drop of all sexshop sites in Google.ro. Only news sites, blogs are on first 3 pages, totally not relevant and dissapointing :(

    Anyone experienced same thing around the world?

    thanks and Google bless you :)

    Dom

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>