Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Facebook/Twitter Use May Now Mean More for Google/Bing Rankings

Social Media for SEO is Not Just About Links Anymore

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 38 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. Thank you for this useful information.its working for me.

    • Jonathan

      I agree, I think it is one of the most useless sites around. Do the twits have so little going on in their own lives that they need to know everytime their mates sneeze.

  2. If Twitter becomes a part of the formula for the search engine results.. then if a company or webmaster does not think it’s important to have a Twitter account then they might be playing with a deck of cards missing a few key players.

    With that said, yes .. this will impact those who Tweet and those who do not.

    http://www.twitter.com/snerdey

  3. I wonder what effect this will have on our society. Are Google, msn, yahoo just adapting to what is already happening, or are they shaping our future? Will companies with money just hire people to tweet for them? or the curve be shaped by those who have the most free time?

    • Guest

      I hate twitter and own a small company and that was exactly my thought… I’ve been ignoring twitter & facebook from a marketing perspective and now I’m thinking how I’m going to need to pay someone to do this crap for me, cause I’m certainly not going to waste my time doing that!

  4. would this not cause privacy issues? More so with facebook than twitter. I wouldnt want my FB status updates showing up in google.

    I dont think this helps the end user, the person searching for something. I cant think of any time where I wanted to know what the ‘public opinion’ would be. Seems to me like this would muck up the SERPs.

    • Chris Crum

      As far as privacy, they’ll only use what is already made public.

  5. I do alot of marketing on Facebook including be admin of nearly 300 sizeable dedicated groups. It can only be good news if Facebook becomes more findable within Google searches, especially if they take the whats been made public rather than personnal information. Chris.

  6. Buried in the Muck

    While this looks like a good tool for SEO efforts, look at it from the standpoint of a search user.

    It’s already a pain in the a…neck… to search for some business, news, research results, etc. and find 10,000 blog results in the way. How much further will this push really relevant information down in the search rankings?

    I don’t care about opinion. I don’t care about cutesy twits. I want information, and this can only make it more difficult to find worthwhile information.

  7. Do I really need to know that Gregg Harris is having a ham and cheese sandwich today at Harvey’s?

    However, I might be interested in the fact that he was recently appointed CEO of XXXXXXXXXXX, Inc.!

  8. Now, not only will the SERPs be cluttered by banal tweets, opinions and status updates by the growing number of online narcissists, soccer moms and ‘casual’ Internet users, but they will also be FLOODED with ‘updates’ by spammers and affiliate marketers galore.

    I hope hope hope in a dorm room somewhere there are some bright kids putting the polishing touches on the next real search engine, because this is quickly getting ridiculous..

    • Sharon

      I agree.

    • Sharon

      I agree.

  9. thanks for sharing. I am glad to hear those news. Then there is more ways we could work for, not only for links.

    • Jlarranaga

      Is it my imagination or when you update your status on LinkedIn regularly, do the search engines find it and boost your organic search.

      Jim
      http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimlarranaga

  10. Guest

    This all that we need to clutter up search engine results with more garbage.

    Probably 99% of Twitter tweets are useless nonsense. The same goes for most postings to the FaceBook wall. It is just social chatter.

    How could this possibly be a good thing? Do you really want all of the dribble from social networks to pollute search results?

    • Chris Crum

      Couldn’t you say the same thing about the web in general? There is a lot of useless nonsense out there. It’s hard to say until we really see it in action, but I would assume that they’ll try to keep things relevant.

  11. Guest

    Facebook and Twitter provide useless info, why include up to date crap into search engines. It doesn’t matter though…the signing deals are all these companies care about anyway.

    • I think the info on Facebook and Twiiter could be useful on search engines. Lets say you are headed on a road trip and you want to know how traffic, road conditions, etc are. You could do a search and find people talking about these things from twitter and facebook in real time.

      • Guest

        Yeah, and I could just go search on twitter for it too… Why muck up the REAL search results for everyone else with babble from twitter & facebook?

  12. I tested a few searches with the Bing beta. For the ones I did, the info was relevant. I then made a tweet to see how quickly it could be find. It was in about 2 minutes. That was pretty cool.

    The question becomes though, would I have to tweet all day long to stay on top for the phrases we are optimizing for. It just seems like it will be come ridiculous. And how many people would choose a twitter search over a regular search?

    I don’t know, but a new SE is sounding good. For now I’ll play with it and see what happens.

    http://twitter.com/jumbocds

    cd :O)

  13. Becoming more engaging, actually becoming a real person on Twitter is what is going to win out in the end. The days of spammers running Twitter are over. Those automated tweets are going to go the way of spam email…straight to the junk folder with very little engagement or activity. This is a good thing!

  14. man.. this makes me use twitter more often..

  15. Even with real time indexing being a super cool feature of a search engine, I think that the line between disaster and brilliant when including Facebook and Twitter into search results is so fine!

    It would be interesting to see if one search engine didn’t include Facebook and Twitter in search results and see if their market share shifted positively or negatively.

    Personally I think that it is great that it is being included for now to see how it works, but not sure if it should be a permanent inclusion.

  16. Rensa

    Why not simply add Twitter Search and Facebook Search?

  17. That’s great, both the search engines are implimenting new things

  18. Thanks for the post and for sharing the resourceful new about Twitter Facebook importance in the eyes of Google and Bing.

  19. All World information in just one Website:
    This website is help to every one people in worldwide.

    http://www.millwala.com/ . Gold Price, Oil Price, World Stock Exchange, World Record, Earth Quake, World Population, All University, Exhibition, Science, Technology, World Hospital, Books, World Business, World Education, Shopping, Sports, World Video Clip, Computers, Cars, Mobile Set, Library, Video Games, Weapon, All Mountain, World Immigration, Bridal Dress, All Foods, Swine Flu Virus, All Drugs & Much More.

  20. It’s all good as far as I’m concerned. Since I use both of these social sites to market my safety and security web site. I think it’s great. Thanks, Chris.

  21. I think it will definitely cause an increase in traffic

  22. We automated tweets about 6 months ago. Every single product update created a tweet. Gained followers and traffic out of it. This can only help.

  23. Adding tweets to search results is pretty useful imo. Real-time search like search.twitter.com is definitely the future. However, since spammers abound on Twitter, I hope Google’s search results won’t be loaded with junk. Google provides relevant results most of the time. Hope they’ll keep doing so.

  24. I am using a nice software for my blogs and each time I post a new information it automaticly posts a “tweet” from my Twitter account about the fresh posts. Nice) Here is a link where you can download it for free : http://www.tweetmyblog.com/?rid=18055

  25. It would be nice to see relevant post listed, but so much of it is just nothing. How do you determine relevancy other than who the sender might be?

  26. Very interesting post. thanks!

  27. Jonathan

    I think that unless they have the option to exclude FB and Twitter (which quite frankly is the most useless thing around) in the results then I think this is a really bad idea. When I am searching for information on something I dont really want to get a bunch tweets in the results. However if I want to know what someone thinks about something thenI might.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>