I also live in Nevada. I don't think the endorser of this bill is thinking of the horrible outcome of legalized online gambling. It would be like putting ATM or credit card slots in all the slot machines. Rep. Frank needs to do some homework on gambling addiction and the treatment costs to insurance companies, or talk to families that have had their savings wiped out because of their or a loved ones addiction. It's not a quiet little secret, just check Nevada's numbers and think of all the ones not reported or tracked. Sure it may start out as fun and convienent, but the ease of it will make some folks "chase the last loss" and try to recoup it- so begins the cycle.
I'm not speaking of personal experience with gambling, but a family member is an alcoholic and has told me people at his AA meetings aren't all alcoholics- they are working class and some prominent members of our community with gambling addictions (no names mentioned, of course).
With the cost of insurance and the lack of some insurers not covering mental health or addictions it would be irresponsible to think $52 billion would cover the loss. THAT would be a gamble at best.
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising






















Barney Frank’s new bill To Legalize Online Gambling
Re: Barney Frank’s new bill To Legalize Online Gambling
Could Your Home Become an Online Casino You Can’t Leave?
I live in Nevada. The only reason many people don’t lose “everything” gambling is because they can leave the Casino. With legalized online gambling piped into home computers, players won’t be able to leave. Every home will have the potential of becoming a 24/7 Casino. While Rep. Frank touts the taxes government will collect on gambling, there is no mention government might have to spend more than collected on social costs cause by increased gambling. Rep. Frank’s bill appears to represent the best interests of online casino owners and not Americans.