At HubPages we've been offering a very similar open publishing platform for almost two years. In that time 30,000 different authors have produced over 150,000 articles. Given our success and the success of Squidoo and others, it's no suprise that Google wants to jump into the game.
However, we think that we are ahead of the current version of Knol in several ways, 1) Discovery - we organize hubs around tags and topics, and have a complex rating system called HubScore that brings the best authors and content to the top, 2) Tools - for users that aren't familiar with HTML, our tools make it drop dead simple for them to add and position photos, videos, and products to augment their text, 3) Community - we have a large and established base of authors along with powerful community features including forums, fan activity feeds, and requests (q&a), and lastly 4) Monetization -- we give our authors the option to make significant income using AdSense, Kontera, and the Amazon and eBay affiliate programs (or they can turn ads off altogether). Knol shares revenue, but they have a single small ad that is unlikely to make author's much.
I'm sure the Knol team will be working hard to add some of these things, so we're going to have to work even harder to stay ahead of them. We welcome the competition!
Paul Deeds
HubPages General Manager
We've noted time and time again the way in which Wikipedia receives loads of traffic from Google, and to be honest, there's no clear sign that this will change. But Google has gone so far as to launch Knol, a sort of would-be competitor.
Like Wikipedia, Knol encourages users create articles (also called knols). A key difference is that one user (or a small group of them) is actually given credit and pictured at the top of every piece. After that, other people are allowed to suggest changes, and the original authors can accept or reject them as they please.
This shouldn't lead to endless bickering. Instead, on the Official Google Blog, Cedric Dupont and Michael McNally write, "We expect that there will be multiple knols on the same subject," and users can write reviews to sort the good from the bad.
So why, aside from a desire to see their own name and face, would anyone abandon Wikipedia in favor of Knol? A sort of interesting bonus is that The New Yorker magazine will allow Knol authors to add one cartoon to each article. The real draw is this: "At the discretion of the author, a knol may include ads from our AdSense program. If an author chooses to include ads, Google will provide the author with a revenue share from the proceeds of those ad placements."
It might not be long before people are demanding to see Knol, and not Wikipedia, at the top of search results, then. We'll keep an eye on where this goes.
HubPages
Publish A Comment
| Popular WPN Business Resources |
-

Goodbye Vista, Hello Windows 7
Microsoft released its latest edition of Windows on October 22nd to... -

Social Media Trends That Indicate the Future
Where are we going with social media? That question is asked very... -

Time to Get Serious about Social Media
According to Chris Brogan, the President of New Marketing Labs, we...
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising






















hand in hand
Google should kick off with an article on search transparency. Something only they, 'know', something about but never seem to be forthcoming with..