iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
9 commentsMonday, February 11, 2008

Scribbled Lawsuit Against Google Loses Again

Silly basis, bad handwriting

When getting ready to learn about a legal decision, it's best to brace yourself for a lot of reading; court documents can be ridiculously long.  But when siding with Google, the Third Circuit used less than two pages, and this pretty fairly represents how ridiculous the lawsuit was.

Remember the handwritten ramblings asserting that the word "Google" was a scrambled version of some guy's social security number?  Said guy - Dylan Stephen Jayne - wanted $5 billion as a result.  And now Jayne has lost his appeal.Scribbled Lawsuit Against Google Loses Again

The Third Circuit's per curiam decision, which was provided by Eric Goldman, states, "As explained by the District Court, Google and its founders are not state actors, and Jayne's allegation concerning his coded social security number does not constitute a violation of the Constitution or federal law.  We also agree that any amendment of the complaint would be futile."

There's really no other place to go with this story; it's just an example of the legal system working efficiently for once.  Still, you have to wonder how much money (in terms of judges' salaries and lawyers' fees) Jayne wasted with the whole episode.

About the author:
Doug is a staff writer for WebProNews. Visit WebProNews for the latest eBusiness news.

Scribbled Lawsuit Against Google Loses Again

They should have a way for a judge to declare a lawsuit frivolous. Then whatever you asked for, you have to pay, to the person you were suing and serve jail time. Say 1 month for every $1,000 that you were asking for. After a mandatory psych exam, which this guy seemed to need.

Frivolous lawsuits. Send them to jail?

Sending them to jail - great! We need more people in prison. And giving judges a way of throwing a lawsuit out before it's even been heard, that sounds tricky - should it be based on handwritting or haircut?

 

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info