How Badly Do People Want Personalized Search?
Does Personalization Improve Relevance?9 comments Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Let me start off by saying that I have no problem with my search results being personalized, because I understand that search engines want to deliver the best user experience so that users will keep using them. If I get results that are personalized well, that means I don't have to look too far for what I'm trying to find. However, not all users are so thrilled with the evolution of search results pages, particularly with the personalization aspect.
This week, Google announced the launch of a new feature that lets users star their search results for ones they like. This would lead to the starred results appearing at the top of the SERP in future searches, when appropriate. The feature is still rolling out, so if you don't see it yet, you should see it soon.

After reporting on this change, we received comments from readers like:
"I really am getting hacked off with this bloody personalised search thing... the serps are full of bloody crap for 50% of searches and ultimately less relevent than before."
"I think that if they take into consideration the stars for serps everything will be a mess..."
"I'm getting tired of Google forcing things on me. Over and over and over after I have said I do not want to be recognized for my geographical locations, it keeps asking me."
I'm guessing comments like these aren't limited to this particular instance. I doubt that they represent the majority of opinions about Google's SERP changes, but it does raise an interesting question: Is Google trying too hard to improve? To answer this with a yes, would indicate that Google's results are already perfect (or were at least), and while Google has had a pretty good reputation for delivering quality results (and the market share to back it up), I don't know if anyone would go so far as to call them perfect, including Google itself.
There is always room for improvement. Things can always get better. Some ideas work, and others don't. Sometimes you don't know until you try, and if certain concepts don't go over well with the majority, sometimes they are scrapped. In fact, the very release of this starring feature also represents the end of a less successful feature in Google's SearchWiki.
As for personalized search itself, I wouldn't count on it going away anytime soon. I wouldn't count on Google (or the other search engines for that matter) spending less time trying to improve in this area. Why would you want them to? If your results are tailored to you specifically, does that not increase their chances of being more relevant to you?
If privacy is a concern, remember, you can always look at the Google Dashboard and look at everything Google has stored about you from each of the company's products that you may use.
Do you like personalized search? Should search engines continue to innovate in this area? Share your thoughts here.
when i find a site i like, i
when i find a site i like, i add it to favorites. If my favorites don't deliver the goods.. i search. I want results that are based on quality and authority not what i searched for last week.
Google has seriously lost the plot. It was made great because it was simple and delivered quality. Today its not simple and and does not deliver quality.
Today i use Bing far more often than google.
RIP Google, you were good, but now you have been killed by greed.
Publish A Comment
-
3 Steps for Creating a Social Media Strategy
Social media is all about engaging with people whether it be clients,... -
Real-Time Opportunities for Marketers
The explosion of social media has given consumers a strong desire to... -
Why SEO Fundamentals Still Matter
Since SEO is constantly changing, how can SEOs determine the most... -
What Collecta Is Doing to Succeed in Real-Time
Since the majority of people have access to information at their...
Submit Your Article




























Personalised and real-time search
To me (as a user rather than just as an SEO) personalised search is a faulty concept. The point of search is that I'm looking for something I usually don't know much about - why would I want sites that I already know about appearing in such a search. It only really makes sense if you use search merely as a navigation tool rather than a search tool.
As regards real-time search I only see the point in it for news-based queries - otherwise being new doesn't make something any more relevant or carry any quality signal, so why focus on it? The appearance of Twitter or Facebook entries in search results are completely irrelevant for the sort of searches I make, and most of the time so is video. I'd like to be able to turn them off and only nlcude them on the rare occasions when I think they are relevant. I already use a Firefox add-on that kills Adwords for my personal searches since I *never* use PPC ads. Sadly Google seem determined to show me what they think I should see and not what I want to see. Yet the quality of the organic results is probably worse now than it was 5 years ago and they seem to be unable to filter out obvious spam of a type that we ethical SEO's have been railing against for years.
The end result is a low quality experience for many users. I would say to them to concentrate on quality and simplicity and give us a choice of what we want to see in the results rather than foist unwanted "features" on us.