I can be a somewhat cranky person, and as such, there is a fair amount of stuff that annoys me. It turns out that a lot of writers share my dislike for one particular thing, though: in-text advertising.
You’ve seen ‘em: bold, double-underlined words that make small pop-ups erupt all over the screen. They apparently manage to make money, or at least generate traffic - “Project Runway” is a recent example of something that benefited as a result of their use. Still, in-text ads aren’t exactly welcome in most newsrooms.
“Many journalists believe that selling the words in a story blurs the line between editorial and ad content,” reports BusinessWeek. “Some worry it creates an incentive to insert ad-linked words or order up certain types of stories.”
And those (serious) concerns aside, in-text ads are simply annoying; while I try to consider outside sources’ originality, credibility, and readability, I may compromise on any or all of those issues to avoid directing readers to a piece containing in-text ads.
Some sort of grand call to action would probably be pointless. Nonetheless, these are issues that everyone should consider when encountering or employing in-text ads.
Publish A Comment
| Popular WPN Business Resources |
-

Latest Features from Digg and StumbleUpon
Although news outlets continually bring reports about new features on... -

What's Next for Twitter API?
Although Twitter's homepage gets a tremendous amount of traffic, it... -

The Rise of Horizontal Content Sites
Over the last year, the search industry has seen a large rise in...
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising




















