Subscribe to our RSS feed!
Popular » Botched Debate AdWords Case Funny Death By Blogging Wikipedia Rant Craigslist Money Link Bartering

Wikipedia Should Change Its Name To Googlepedia

Wikipedia needs Google like plants need sunshine, according to the latest traffic analysis presented by Hitwise. Half of the online publicly-edited encyclopedia's traffic comes from Google alone, with another 20 percent arising from the other search engines combined.

Wikipedia Should Change Its Name To Googlepedia
Wikipedia Should Change Its Name To Googlepedia
That's 70 percent from search engines, for the mathematically impaired, a number no doubt responsible for Wikipedia's recent debut on the Internet's top 10 list.

Wikipedia's market share of traffic has increased by 143 percent over the last year, perhaps in part due to Stephen Colbert's constant poking at them, but also in very large part due to Google's inherent trust of the site as a quality information source.

The site's high ranking in Google's search results is evident of that trust, as well as trust around the Web in general (Wikipedia gets lots of link love), but according to a commenter on LeeAnn Prescott's blog post, it ranks a bit higher on Google than other search engine results.

A quick test of that theory, searching for the infamous "elephants" entry, shows that seems to be true for that term at least. Wikipedia's submission on elephants, once terrorized by Colbert Report fans to say that the elephant population had tripled, appears as the number one result in Google, even above Elephants.com, the number one result at Yahoo, MSN, and Ask.com.

Prescott confirms that what has appeared to be true is certainly true:

If it seems like Google is sending more traffic to Wikipedia than in the past, it's because it is. The percentage of Google's downstream traffic going to Wikipedia increased by 166% year over year (week ending 2/10/07 vs. week ending 2/11/06). Last week Wikipedia was the #3 website in Google's downstream, after Google Image Search and MySpace.

So how important is it for webmasters that their site rank well on Google? Well, considering only a fifth of Wikipedia's traffic comes from the other major search engines combined, it would seem a requisite for Web survival.





Add to Del.icio.us | Digg | Reddit | Furl


Bookmark WebProNews: Digg This! StumbleUpon This!
AddThis Social Bookmark Widget

About the author:
Jason Lee Miller is a WebProNews editor and writer covering business and technology.

Comments

wikipedia google

Actually, I use wikipedia FAR more than raw Google. Google is so filled with commercial sites and blogs that one must wade through a lot of crap to get near good basic data. If I want facts first I add "wikipedia" to the front of my searches. Only after I have consulted it do I remove that word and see what else pops up.

 

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info