Google is also asking for jury trial. Not sure if that means they mean business, or if it’s a bad idea. After all, wouldn’t judges understand better than stupid juries that the DMCA is vital to the free exchange on the internet, while the rubes on the jury might just say “a copyright violation is a copyright violation”? I wouldn’t put my faith in a jury, especially on such a complex matter.
Seeking Alpha outlines a dozen defenses Google put forth, including that Viacom’s claims are wrong because of fair use (which will put fair use on trial, and maybe get it defined properly), that Google had “innocent intent” (yikes, not a great arguement), that Viacom is misusing copyright, that Viacom is guilty of “unclean hands” (an arguement that they could have stopped it, but didn’t want to get their hands dirty, and as a result made things worse), and that there are substantial noninfringing usage.
For god’s sake, I hope this goes to trial. There are so many legal points to be hashed out, it would be great to get a definitive answer from a court.
Comments
