Wow...microsoft thinking outside of the box. It been years since they had done that!
Microsoft has a big idea on ranking pages listed in a search engine index for later retrieval. A query seeking information on a topic ought to bring up pages ordered at least in part by how long people spent on such pages in their browsers.
CNET called it a move to one-up search leader Google, which itself only uses PageRank as one of dozens of factors in determining where a page lists in response to a query. Google's dominance of the search market shows their approach is working; Google is even a dictionary-listed verb these days.
A Microsoft research paper shows where the company sees an alternative to a site that in the estimation of many already owns the search market. Through looking at "user behavior data," Microsoft's researchers suggested they have a more reliable way of assessing a particular page's importance.
Microsoft's China-based researchers claim to have this figured out. But it will need data that goes beyond click-throughs to measure adequately.
That brings up an interesting idea: how much access will people, both visitors and site publishers, be willing to give Microsoft to make for a better search experience? Microsoft probably has the ability to utilize its own resources, like the Windows Live Toolbar, to help grab such data.
Not everyone will use a toolbar with their browser, of course, and Microsoft doesn't want to be in the position of trying to push it on people, lest they run afoul of their antitrust minders at the Justice Department.
Google's PageRank succeeds partially due to its invisibility. The typical Internet user simply doesn't see a crawler's work behind the scenes, and computers can accurately count those inbound links in short order. BrowseRank may be the next great advance in search, but if it relies on active participation beyond a link spider's actions, it may not get the critical mass of data it will need to succeed.
Publish A Comment
| Popular WPN Business Resources |
-

Goodbye Vista, Hello Windows 7
Microsoft released its latest edition of Windows on October 22nd to... -

Social Media Trends That Indicate the Future
Where are we going with social media? That question is asked very... -

Time to Get Serious about Social Media
According to Chris Brogan, the President of New Marketing Labs, we...
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising





















Great post
Very interesting, although this has been tried before. DirectHit had a search engine built entirely on clickstream data (Acquired by Ask.com in 2000). They got the data from ISPs in those days. The end-result is really not that much better than Page-Rank.
We at Me.dium, on the other hand, are processing our user's clickstream data in real-time to create a different lens based on what's going on now. e.g. do a search for John Edwards on Google or Live, and you get johnedwards.com and wiki/johnedwards. Do the same search on Me.dium and you learn that today people care about his love child, pictures of his mistress, etc.
The difference is real-time (what people are browsing now) vs. historical (what they browsed in the past). Social vs. Old School. Check it out and let us know your thoughts. http://me.dium.com/search.