iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
7 commentsWednesday, July 16, 2008

AOL Spammer's Success Leads To Jail Sentence

Habitual criminal gets 30 months
Breaking through AOL's anti-spam efforts, combined with talking to the wrong person, netted spammer Adam Vitale two and a half years in jail.

The repeatedly convicted Vitale finally received his sentence in a case that concerned AOL. He and another man, Todd Moeller, engaged in the kind of spamming that filtering measures should stop, but in AOL's case, did not.

Reuters said Vitale picked up a 30-month sentence in the case, as well as a $180,000 penalty to be repaid to AOL.

They managed to elude AOL's defense through a combination of relays and forged headers, which suggests the use of compromised computers as part of a botnet. Such botnets regularly figure in massive spamming campaigns.

Vitale originally faced 11 years in jail and a $250,000 fine for violating the CAN-SPAM Act. Vitale came to the attention of federal authorities after assuring a government informant he could spam about 300 million people.

Vitale also suggested a deal with the informant that would have Vitale spam people with ads for a security product in exchange for half the profits on that product's sales.

News Tags: Spam, AOL, Adam Vitale

Loose Lips Sink Ships.......

Loose Lips Sink Ships.......

This I understand...but

This kind of deliberate attempt at circumventing AOL's defense through a combination of relays and forged headers, suggesting the use of compromised computers as part of a botnet with the purpose of massive spamming campaigns, I agree should be stopped.

However, small business owners who respond to related articles with helpful information and try to add a url tag at the end to make it easier for readers to find their site if they so choose is also considered spam and are warned or worse blocked entirely.

I have a safety and security web site. One of my roles is to raise awareness for a safer lifestyle as well as offer products to enhance that safety.

I would like to be able to make my products more accessible to those who feel they need them after reading one of my comments but I would risk being blocked if I added my url. I definitely think this is wrong.

I've seen comments in blogs that use foul and inflammatory language disguised with symbols and blanks that everyone knows what being said, yet a sincerely well thought out comment of mine that is meant to help people stay safe will get blocked, band or warned if I add my url at the end. 

I wish there were a way to change this. I am certainly not in the same category as Adam Vitale yet I feel I am being equally punished.

 

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info