iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
6 commentsTuesday, August 4, 2009

AdWords-Related Schoemaker Suit Settled

But Google may still get dragged in

Not too long ago, quite a mess came into being as Jeremy Schoemaker sued Keyen Farrell for his (alleged) misuse of Google AdWords.  Farrell countersued, claiming defamation.  Now, Farrell's withdrawn his lawsuits and reached a settlement with Schoemaker, but things might actually escalate rather than go back to normal. 

Google Logo

The truly odd thing about this situation was that Farrell worked as a Google AdWords account specialist.  So if, as Schoemaker accused, Farrell was posting advertisements that infringed on the ShoeMoney trademark, his behavior is rather hard to excuse.

Moreover, it's difficult not to think about what sort of responsibility for the problem Google itself should or shouldn't bear.  And that's where a juicy-if-true bit of gossip enters the equation.  Barry Schwartz writes, "[T]here is a rumor that Farrells agreed to legally testify against Google, if Schoemaker decides to take Google to court."

Also, Schwartz heard that the settlement involves Farrell paying $150,000 to the ShoeMoney Media Group.  So it seems reasonable to believe that any lawsuit Schoemarker brings against Google would name an equal or greater amount.

This will bear watching.  We'll be sure to report any updates.

Sure, enough, UPDATE: Per the comment from J. Scott Paul below, it seems that the rumors were incorrect.

About the author:
Doug is a staff writer for WebProNews. Visit WebProNews for the latest eBusiness news.

The settlement rumors were wrong

Your speculation about rumors published on Search Engine Land earlier today is incorrect.
That article, written by Barry Schwartz, has been edited to delete the incorrect rumors that were attributed to an anonymous source.
Before editing the article to delete the rumors, Mr. Schwartz acknowledged in a postscript to the article that the rumors were indeed incorrect. This occurred after he talked to the attorney representing Shoemoney and me, the attorney for Keyen Farrell.
Please correct your article immediately.
J. Scott Paul
McGrath North Mullin & Kratz, Pc, LLO.
1601 Dodge
Omaha, Ne.
68102

Jeremy Shoe- greed head

this guy is a total douche!! it's all about $$$ for this fraud a-hole!!!

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info