this guy is a total douche!! it's all about $$$ for this fraud a-hole!!!
Not too long ago, quite a mess came into being as Jeremy Schoemaker sued Keyen Farrell for his (alleged) misuse of Google AdWords. Farrell countersued, claiming defamation. Now, Farrell's withdrawn his lawsuits and reached a settlement with Schoemaker, but things might actually escalate rather than go back to normal.

The truly odd thing about this situation was that Farrell worked as a Google AdWords account specialist. So if, as Schoemaker accused, Farrell was posting advertisements that infringed on the ShoeMoney trademark, his behavior is rather hard to excuse.
Moreover, it's difficult not to think about what sort of responsibility for the problem Google itself should or shouldn't bear. And that's where a juicy-if-true bit of gossip enters the equation. Barry Schwartz writes, "[T]here is a rumor that Farrells agreed to legally testify against Google, if Schoemaker decides to take Google to court."
Also, Schwartz heard that the settlement involves Farrell paying $150,000 to the ShoeMoney Media Group. So it seems reasonable to believe that any lawsuit Schoemarker brings against Google would name an equal or greater amount.
This will bear watching. We'll be sure to report any updates.
Sure, enough, UPDATE: Per the comment from J. Scott Paul below, it seems that the rumors were incorrect.
Publish A Comment
| Popular WPN Business Resources |
-

Yahoo Reveals SEM of Re-Brand
Near the end of September, Yahoo began a new branding campaign in an... -

Search + Social = Better ROI
Are you utilizing search and social media together? According to Lee... -

Marketing in the Age of Google
Former Googler Vanessa Fox has written a book entitled Marketing in...
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising





















The settlement rumors were wrong
Your speculation about rumors published on Search Engine Land earlier today is incorrect.
That article, written by Barry Schwartz, has been edited to delete the incorrect rumors that were attributed to an anonymous source.
Before editing the article to delete the rumors, Mr. Schwartz acknowledged in a postscript to the article that the rumors were indeed incorrect. This occurred after he talked to the attorney representing Shoemoney and me, the attorney for Keyen Farrell.
Please correct your article immediately.
J. Scott Paul
McGrath North Mullin & Kratz, Pc, LLO.
1601 Dodge
Omaha, Ne.
68102