iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
16 commentsWednesday, July 15, 2009

Google Sued By Rosetta Stone Over Trademarks

Claims Adwords causing confusion

Update

WebProNews spoke to Eric Goldman, Associate Professor, Santa Clara University School of Law and Director of the High Tech Law Institute about the latest trademark case brought against Google.

Eric Goldman
Eric Goldman

Goldman said the lawsuit by Rosetta Stone was the ninth keyword trademark suit brought against Google that he was aware of. He said "suing Google has become the new American pastime."

He noted that Google did settle a similar lawsuit brought by American Airlines over keywords that was resolved out of court. Details of the terms of the settlement have not been made public and Goldman says it's an unusual deal Google made with American.

Goldman does not think Google will settle with Rosetta Stone out of court and that case along with the other eight cases against Google would likely be consolidated into one court.

Goldman believes that we are years away from a definitive resolution to such suits and that the laws are currently too confusing.
 

Orginal Article

Language-learning firm, Rosetta Stone, filed a lawsuit today in U.S. federal court against Google, claiming that the company is infringing on its trademarks.

In its lawsuit, Rosetta Stone alleges that Google allows third parties including individuals involved in software piracy to purchase the right to use Rosetta Stone trademarks or other terms confusingly similar in Google's Adwords advertising program.

Michael Wu
Michael Wu

In June 2009, Google changed its policy stating that "advertisers will be allowed to use trademark terms in their ad text even if they do not own that trademark or have explicit approval from the trademark owner to use it."

"Google's search engine is helping third parties mislead consumers and misappropriate Rosetta Stone trademarks by using them as 'keyword' triggers for paid advertisements and by using them within the text or title of paid advertisements," said Michael Wu, general counsel, Rosetta Stone.

"Google and its advertisers benefit financially from and trade off the goodwill and reputation of Rosetta Stone without incurring the substantial expense that Rosetta Stone has incurred in building up its popularity, name recognition, and brand loyalty."

With its lawsuit, Rosetta Stone is seeking injunctive relief to stop Google from selling the Rosetta Stone trademarks or other terms confusingly similar for use in Google's Adwords advertising program.
 

About the author:
Mike is a staff writer for WebProNews.

Interesting

I think Google will have a better chance to win this.

Rosetta is barking at the wrong tree!

This is sort of like compaining to the postman that your paycheck wasn't as large as it was last week! It's simply the wrong tree!

I seriously doubt that Google would be considered liable in this case. It's the copy-cats that should be focused upon for using Rosetta Stone's trademark. Sure, it will be more difficult to track down each and every unsavory business that chooses to borrow or steal their trademark. But this type of shady business practice has been going on for ages.

Good luck Rosetta Stone! You're clearly spending your time and money in the wrong direction.

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info