Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Reputation Management Should Be Proactive, Not Reactive

Avoid the Legal "Black Hole"

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 7 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. This is interesting information. Reputation management is widely used now-a-days with the advent of widespread computing. We can track an entity’s actions as well as its opinions related to the actions. Check out Q3 technologies for more details.

  2. Exactly happened with one client I don’t like to name here, but a single forum user brought down the reputation one of website. He created a thread about complain of services. And this is great pain in but to beat them. Anyway I always wonder, are branding and online reputation management same part? I would like give kudos for whole article.

  3. Bottom line is that people need one type of online reputation management and companies need another. Companies need sites like http://ReputationAccelerator.com in order to provide proper distribution of content while stand alond individuals can probably get by with products such as Reputation Defender.

  4. Who wants to do business with a bad company? It is worth it to consider the facts behind the claims made on both sides of the Internet postings and advertisements.

    When a deadbeat customer has not paid for services, The Internet is an easy and effective tool to promote the situation with facts and dates to expose the deadbeats for what they are, for example.

    Usually Internet leverage can be used to persuade the deadbeat to pay their invoices by alerting them to the idea (and even showing the prepared document) that will be released on the Internet if they do not pay their bill. Once the deadbeats grasp what the Internet can do to damage their credibility and their name, they usually see that it is in their best interest to do the proper thing and pay their invoices.

    But once that information is released, the cat is out of the bag and there is no economical recourse. So be careful, be factual, and be honest in what is posted to avoid court costs and inconveniences.

  5. Man I am soooooh sorry for pointing the obvious, I would never hire a reputation management firm if the CEO is named Downhill. Talk about predicting your future, just puns with her name representing you is enough…Xyz’s Downhill slides in by stating…. and you have a downhill slide of your reputation.

    I get last names are yours for life but managing that one is the first step I think.

  6. I am not sure I get what Downhill means. If you notice an online reputation management issue and see a blogger or some community talking trash – recommendation is do nothing?

    I can understand that in certain cases that may be the best, but definitely don’t think that should become a policy.

    In terms of attorneys and reputation issues online – unfortunately, it seems that involving legal help pretty quick can create Streisand effect. I have yet to see (and don’t get me wrong, I would love to!) where legal could be involved to help with reputation and removing your name from google issues. We actually advise clients not to involve legal help unless every other resource has been exhausted.

    Good tip Wozman about what can and can’t be said online. I wish there was more info on that!!

    Cheers!

  7. The above given information is very useful. Reputation management should be proactive because trashing a high traffic forum, blog or etc. will surely affect the hit rate. You can do it for your own sites but it should not be in the others

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>