Quantcast

Nearly 20% Of Marketing Emails Fail To Arrive

Email deliverability sees small gains

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:
[ Technology]

Nearly twenty percent (19.9%) of commercial, permissioned emails never reached consumers inboxes in the United States and Canada in the second half of 2009, according to a new report from Return Path.

Permissioned email reached only 80.1 percent of consumer inboxes in the United States and Canada during the second half of 2009, a .8 percent increase from the 79.3 percent inbox place in the first half of 2009. In the United States and Canada, 3.5 percent of those emails ended up in a junk or bulk emails folder and 16.3 percent were missing with no notification of non-delivery.

In Europe, 85.5 percent of emails reached consumers inboxes, 3.6 percent of emails were delivered to a junk or bulk folder, and 11 percent were missing. In the Asia Pacific region, inbox placement of emails was higher in the second half of 2009 with an 86.9 percent success rate.

Email

"We spent a lot of time in 2009 discussing how inbox placement rates affect ROI, and we’re going to continue talking about this issue in 2010. Many senders believe that their email campaigns are achieving a 95% to 98% delivery rate. However, as our latest Email Deliverability Benchmark Report clearly illustrates, senders still do not have the correct data to accurately determine true ROI," said George Bilbrey, President and Co-founder, Return Path.

"If senders and ESPs count only their hard bounces as emails that failed to reach consumers, they’re not getting an accurate metric as to how many emails actually made it into subscriber inboxes. Ultimately, only emails that reach a subscriber’s inbox can be opened, clicked and converted into a loyal and active customer. Remember, sent minus bounce does not equal delivered."

The top five ISPs for senders to reach consumer inboxes in the United States ranked in order of difficulty were BellSouth, Gmail, MSN, Hotmail, and Yahoo!.

The top five ISPs for senders to reach consumer inboxes in Canada were Primus.ca, Shaw, SaskTel, MTS, and Bell. Primus.ca which uses Postini as part of its email filtering system, failed to deliver 55% of emails that marketers sent to Primus.ca users which represents a 2% increase from the first half of 2009.

The top five ISPs for senders to reach consumer inboxes in the United Kingdom ranked in order of difficulty are Demon, BT Internet, AOL, Orange, and Yahoo!.

Related Articles:

>10 Reasons Social Media Isn’t Replacing Email

>Emails With Coupons Achieve Higher Open Rates

>Majority Of Consumers Want To Interact With Brands Online

 

 

Nearly 20% Of Marketing Emails Fail To Arrive
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • http://www.shapirit.biz ????? ??????

    Making the way to the consumer’s inbox may answer the “where the money I invested went” but this report does not look on the revenue (return) of the investment, so it should not be taken as an advice to promote your business by mail.

  • http://www.haseltine-photo.com Real Estate Photography

    These numbers are frustrating. The open and return on investment rate of email advertising is already low without missing emails. The fact that so many emails never reach the consumer makes an already annoying form of marketing even more annoying!

  • Guest

    The main reason for this is because the email marketing is still majorly controlled by spammers. It so annoying that you get so much of spam everyday.

  • http://www.earnfromnet.com Money Marketing

    Big market players who use advanced tools to market and deliver may see at most 20% failure rate but for a small business operator, most of who’s marketing efforts depend on manual works see a even higher failure rate.

  • http://DCincome.com allan

    Great post! I guess that could be a big problem
    in making money

  • http://www.afrofabric.com Therese Coker

    Maybe I am naive but what is the justification for blocking an email from reaching the customer when that customer voluntarily signed up to receive the email? It looks to me like a violation of the service agreement that is not different from a bank refusing to honor a check that was written by a customer with funds in the account.