Kourtney Kardashian was no doubt happy that Scott Disick finally visited with their three children--Reign, Penelope, and Mason Disick. The children hadn't seen their father in a month. Her happiness over that visit didn't last long, however. Kourtney soon found out that Scott threw a big party--replete with booze and lots of women--right after visiting his kids. A woman at the party was even spotted wearing Lord Disick's bathrobe. That must have been some party.
During his visit with the children, Kourtney Kardashian reportedly trusted Scott Disick to come inside their home. She is no doubt rethinking that trust, and surely won't allow him there unchaperoned again.
It was only a couple of weeks ago that Scott's dalliances with Chloe Bartoli were the proverbial icing on the cake for Kourtney Kardashian. She broke up with Scott--her partner of almost 10 years--upon his return to the U.S. She had the locks changed on all the doors at her home and initially had no plans to allow Scott Disick inside unless she was home. Knowing how important it is for her kids to have a relationship with their father, she relented and allowed Scott to visit the kids while she stepped out.
So, there was a party at Scott Disick's LA bachelor pad yesterday: http://t.co/snKuOgvyT3
— E! News (@ENews) July 17, 2015
Scott Disick's most recent example of boorish behavior likely serves to assure Kourtney Kardashian that she made the right decision in dumping him. Those closest to the Keeping Up With the Kardashians star are likely wondering what took her so long.
Kourtney's family has supported her and their children since the split. Rob Kardashian recently hung out with Penelope Disick. Kanye West has played 'dad' to all three of the children. Kim Kardashian West and Khloe Kardashian have both helped with the children and with Kourtney Kardashian's morale.
— HollywoodLife (@HollywoodLife) July 16, 2015
What's your take on Scott Disick's wild party following his visit with his children? Can you blame Kourtney Kardashian for being disgusted with him yet again?