Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Google Reveals Factors for Ranking Tweets

Things You Should Know About Real-Time SEO

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!

It’s ok to say "no" to Twitter if that’s your thing. There’s a chance that it just doesn’t fit into your strategy or help you achieve your goals. That’s cool. However, if it is your thing, you may be interested in how Google ranks tweets. That is if search marketing is your thing.

Do you see Twitter as important to an effective search marketing campaign? Share your thoughts here.

Google and Microsoft almost simultaneously announced deals with Twitter a few months back, that would give the companies access to tweets in real-time to fuel their respective search engines’ real-time results. Microsoft immediately launched their version, but it was separate from the regular Bing search engine. Google waited a while, but eventually started incorporating real-time results right into regular Google SERPs (including not only tweets, but various other sources).

After the Twitter deals were announced, Bing came out and said, "If someone has a lot of followers, his/her Tweet may get ranked higher. If a tweet is exactly the same as other Tweets, it will get ranked lower."

Amit Singhal Google was not as vocal about how it would rank tweets and other real-time results, but the company has now shed a bit of light on that via an interview with MIT’s Technology Review. David Talbot interviewed Google "Fellow" Amit Singhal, who has led development of real-time search at the company. According to him, Google also ranks tweets by followers to an extent, but it’s not just about how many followers you get. It’s about how reputable those followers are.

Singhal likens the system to the well-known Google system of link popularity. Getting good links from reputable sources helps your content in Google, so having followers with that some kind of authority theoretically helps your tweets rank in Google’s real-time search.

"One user following another in social media is analogous to one page linking to another on the Web. Both are a form of recommendation," Singhal says. "As high-quality pages link to another page on the Web, the quality of the linked-to page goes up. Likewise, in social media, as established users follow another user, the quality of the followed user goes up as well."

But that’s only one factor.

Do you commonly use hashtags in your tweets? If your goal is to rank in Google’s real-time search index, you may want to cut down on that practice, because according to Singhal, that is a big red flag for a lower quality tweet. This seems to be part of Google’s spam control strategy.

Another noteworthy excerpt from the interview:

Another problem: how, if someone is searching for "Obama," to sift through White House press tweets and thousands of others to find the most timely and topical information. Google scans tweets to find the "signal in the noise," he says. Such a "signal" might include a new onslaught of tweets and other blogs that mention "Cambridge police" or "Harry Reid" near mentions of "Obama." By looking out for such signals, Google is able to furnish real-time hits that contain the freshest subject matter even for very common search terms.

Well, we certainly know more about Google’s strategy for tweet ranking now, but there are still plenty of questions about it. What is Google’s stance is on Ghost Tweeting? Are Google’s ranking factors a good reason to create and follow more Twitter lists in hopes for gaining more reputable industry followers?

The factors mentioned aren’t the only ones Google employs. It’s not like Google is going to tell us everything. It also helps to keep in mind that real-time search spans far beyond just tweets. Still, Twitter is clearly a big part of it, and even the significance of tweets themselves will evolve in time.

Google says it hopes to factor in geo-location data (with regards to tweets) into the real-time search results at some point. Google and Twitter engineers frequently collaborate on  real-time search, which Google itself says is evolving.

By the way, it stands to reason that Google’s strategy for ranking tweets probably shares similarities for how it ranks content from other sources drawn from for real-time search.

Is ranking in Google’s real-time search important to your strategy? Discuss here.

Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 41 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. So its about how reputable those followers are. Sounds like another way of setting criterias for linking (citation) , sounds like its accurate to say that if you get followers from the dogs in restaurant industry like VSAG, Synergy Consultants, National Rest Consult. You can be up there in the real time search. neat! I guess its something that we can track. thanks Google~

  2. Just as suspected, the biggest spammers, will get on top.

    It sounds like Google is going to try and sort through the spam though. Good luck, considering it’s twitter.

    I can see the desire because there are lots of real human on twitter and when something newsworthy happens, chances are some one on the scene is going to tweet about it, but within hours it’s going to be buried in spam again.

    Sounds like a tough task separating the spam from the news.

    Since the real people don’t have anywhere near as many followers as the spammers, then it’s likely if they use followers instead of date, time and relevancy as an important ranking factor that they will fail.

  3. Considering the huge amount of energy or manual marketing efforts a website owners needs to put together to obtain top rankings in tweets as well as SERPs, I ask myself, “What should a small business owner do online to make sure his virtual real estate is noticed!” … and this would be the case if he even knows what to do, which I doubt everyone knows.

    Of course, it’s easy to say that he needs to hire a pro to get things done for him, but let’s see how much it’ll cost him. Some can afford it, but some others just have to watch how others succeed. Well, maybe this is how the marketing world helps businesses get advantages over others!

  4. I suspect that more news will come and Google will continue to modify its algorithms to further filter out the noise. You’ve got to believe that they are also looking at length of time a user has had an account on Twitter along with number of followers. It was also interesting to read about their position on hashtags. Many thanks for the info.

  5. I can understand the monitoring of hashtags as spam control when indexing a twitter feed, however I wonder about one specific tag, the use of #fb for a Facebook Selective tweet.

    Does anybody have any word on whether #fb is derogatory in the Google/Bing algorithms.

  6. In the last few days I’ve backtracked actual tweets that made it to Google’s new live search feature. The big boys aren’t the only ones winning this time. Here’s a video with a case study, http://bit.ly/8tswbD.

  7. I was thinking the same thing, but had never discussed it or heard anyone else discuss it.

    So yeah, more followers the better you rank. I would then guess the better your links in your post rank as far topic go.

    Its nice to hear the final word from google however cryptic their message may be.

  8. I don’t understand why the use of tags becomes a “big red flag for a lower quality tweet”. Certainly, spammers will try to take advantage of tags, but as long as tags are mentioned in the text, I think they should be considered legitimate.

  9. In order to evaluate how you as a reputable source I almost feel like they have to assign you a user ranking, something akin to the page rank system but based around twitter values like your following to the follower ration your Retweet ratios inbound links to your tweets, how often your tweets appeared in twitter user searches, thins like that would actually begin to make some sense.

  10. Chris, as usual great post! Like everyone else, I’m pretty surprised that hashtags would be seen as a redflag, great to know that now! Also nice to know they aren’t ranking on following size alone.

  11. So, Kim Kardashian has a buttload of followers, but do I really give a hoot what she thinks about a certain topic … NO!

    Not to mention the fact that she gets a whopping $10,000 everytime she tweets about a product.

    • Guest

      Who the hell is Kim Kardashian? Exactly!

  12. I’m actually not shocked AT all since hashtags are to Twitter as meta keywords are to Google.

  13. Guest

    I think you meant relevant.

  14. We wrote this post on August 5, 2009 and it has never been more relevant. Pittsburgh SEO Your Twitter Tweets has all the logic built in.

    On the subject of hashtags; Hashtags used to be a way to incorporate your tweets into relevant areas. It is disheartening to think that they would be penalized but whatever the almighty Google desires.

    Next thought, what about a retweet? Will it draw a penalty as duplicate content? Following the Google method it should be sandboxed – and thus worthless – or even penalized.

    Once again, I guess it all comes down to research and testing.

  15. Part of this game is just work: It is important to take care about twitter, facebook, etc…, but we just have to work, and be present, google will naturally going to rank better the correct page to specific search, it has to think how rank to do your job better…, and also time helps…

  16. Ranking tweets as to how many followers and the value of those followers is obviously part of an overall plan for better search results by the search engines and it makes since that they have to be careful to provide good results to their searchers.

    Mary

  17. In my opinion this may help get twitter real. If people in business use twitter as a business marketing tool to it’s potential they may realize the importance of real potential customers as followers instead of anyone and everyone they can get to follow.

  18. Even if backlinks are nofollow..they are still good!!

  19. whether twitter best way to get a place in google??

  20. How to do SEO via Twitter, exact help required. I mean if I want to rank a page of my site in Google (via Twitter) what I need to do in Twitter.

    I am a newbie in twitter.

  21. Couple of things ~ I don’t understand the hashtag being penalized. I’ve used them to look for relevant information almost every day.

    Are we going to see Twitter move to more verified accounts?

  22. Off course, I see Twitter as important to an effective search marketing campaign!,

    • Guest

      Yes, using Twitter is “off course.”

  23. I have held off of the twitter revoloution because I never saw the benefit. I mean yeah you could get traffic if you have enough followers, but it has seemed like in order to get a substantial number of followers spamming methods are being used. And it doesn’t look like that is changing anytime soon.

  24. Yes, I see spammers and bots will get nice positions with this, too. There must be other serious factors to reveal who is person and who is not on Twitter.

  25. The comments above are valid. The choice is ours to make. In my opinion the jury is still out. If Google finds a way to make money from its relationship with Twitter then of course SEO will be affected by Twitter.

  26. Not surprised that the use of hash tags would be considered low quality by google.

  27. I’m a bit confused, what are considered quality twitter followers? How does google determine that? And I follow people who constantly are posting their ads. I mean they just sent it to me 2 seconds ago. Should I stop following them? Does that lower my quality?

    I try and post quality, inspirational stuff. Also, Is there a daily limit as well that we should stay under? I’m new to this whole twitter thing. Any advice?

    I’m trying to promote my writing site http://www.needawriter.us. But my main twitter account is under my personal training services “positiveworkout” Should I keep them separate? I need any and all advice I can get, to compete in this tough market. Please help me. If anyone can give me any advice, I would be greatly appreciative.

    • Guest

      I can give you advise. Stop wasting your time with Twitter.

  28. Google’s once again being vague at best in their strategy. However, I think a lesson we can all learn from this article is to focus on the quality of our tweets. Are they of value to our audience? Do we post links to interesting, compelling content? Are we utilizing good keywords for our business? It will be interesting to see how tweet ranking plays out in the search engines. In the meantime, I will continue tweeting quality content that will actually be of use to search engines if they do decide to index it.

    Rayanda
    http://www.RayandaArts.com
    http://twitter.com/RayandaArts

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>