Quantcast

Google Makes Mobile Site Optimization an Ad Quality Factor

Optimize for mobile, get more traffic

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:


[ Search]

Google announced that it is making mobile site optimization a new factor of ad quality for AdWords campaigns that are driving mobile search traffic.

Google began limiting ad serving on high-end mobile devices when landing pages contained Flash-heavy content last year. Now, Google is taking the mobile user experience up a notch.

There are plenty of non-AdWords reasons to offer a good mobile experience, particularly as more and more people are using their mobile devices as a major Internet access point, if not their main Internet access point. Sooner or later it’s going to get to the point where it’s just as critical to have a mobile-optimized site as a desktop-optimized site, if that point isn’t already here.

“The best consumer experiences on mobile devices happen on websites that are designed for mobile,” says Google Mobile Ads Product Manager David Nachum. “We all know the difference that sites designed for mobile make in pure usability – they are designed for the smaller touchscreen, making it easy to find what you are looking for and interact with. We believe that giving consumers the best possible experience on their mobile device is critically important. A poor mobile web experience can negatively shape a consumer’s opinion of a brand or company and make it hard for them to engage or make a purchase. A recent study which asked users about the performance of mobile websites found that 61% of users# are unlikely to return to a website that they had trouble accessing from their phone.”

To make a long story short, if your AdWords landing pages are optimized for mobile, they will perform better, and “generally drive more mobile traffic at a lower cost” according to Nachum.

If you need a little help in getting optimized for mobile, he points to a free tool Google recently launched that helps you create mobile pages in Google Sites.

mobilize your business

There is also a webinar about best practices for mobile sites.

Google Makes Mobile Site Optimization an Ad Quality Factor
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • http://www.gbepackaging.com Tony

    Google is getting way too big and you know big companies care about no one but themselves. The Government is looking at Google and it is about time. They have been closing businesses like ours that offer the lowest price. If we did what google wants to get traffic we would have to raise prices 90% or File for chapter 13.

    Thank you Herb Kohl

    Since you are reading this on your computer or smart phone, I wanted to take the opportunity to update you on what has been happening with internet search competition. As Chairman of the Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee, I convened a hearing today to examine the role of Google’s search engine on on-line competition and consumer choices. I had the opportunity to question Google’s Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt and wanted to share with you my comments at the hearing.

    Statement of U.S. Senator Herb Kohl
    Chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy & Consumer Rights
    The Power of Google: Serving Consumers or Threatening Competition?
    September 21, 2011

    Today our Subcommittee meets to consider an issue that affects everyone who searches or does business over the Internet – in other words, almost everybody. We will examine how the world’s dominant Internet search engine – Google – presents its search results to consumers and treats the businesses it competes with. Our inquiry centers on whether Google biases these results in its favor, as its critics charge, or whether Google simply does its best to present results in a manner which best serves consumers, as it claims.

    At the outset I wish to stress that I come to this hearing with an entirely open mind and without any pre-judgment of these issues. My goal is to provide both Google and its critics with a forum to air their views. In examining these issues, we recognize the incredible technological achievements of Google and the need to avoid stifling its creative energy. At the same time, we need to be mindful of the hundreds of thousands of businesses that depend on Google to grow and prosper. We also need to recognize that, as the dominant firm in Internet search, Google has special obligations under antitrust law to not deploy its market power to squelch competition.

    There can be no question of the astounding achievements of Google’s search engine. Through the magic of its search technology, Google – a company literally started in a garage by two Stanford students less than 15 years ago – has done nothing less than organize all of the billions of Internet web pages into an easily accessible listing on the computer screen. Sixty-five to 70% of all US Internet searches on computers, and 95% on mobile devices, are done on Google’s search engine. Millions of people everyday run Google searches to find out the answer to nearly every question imaginable, including for the best and cheapest products and services, from electronics to clothing to hotels to restaurants, to give just a few examples. And businesses equally rely on Google to find customers.

    The basic premise of Google at its founding was that it would build an unbiased search engine — that consumers would see the most relevant search result first, and that the search results would not be influenced by the web page’s commercial relationship with Google. Its goal was to get the user off Google’s home page and on to the websites it lists as soon as possible. As Google’s co-founder and current CEO Larry Page said in 2004, “We want you to come to Google and quickly find what you want. Then we’re happy to send you to the other sites. In fact, that’s the point.”

    However, as Internet search has become a major channel of e-commerce, Google has grown ever more dominant and powerful, and it appears its mission may have changed. For the last five years or so, Google has been on an acquisition binge, acquiring dozens of Internet-related businesses, culminating most recently with its proposed acquisitions of Motorola Mobility and Zagats. It now owns numerous Internet businesses, including in health, finance, travel, and product comparison. This has transformed Google from a mere search engine into a major Internet conglomerate. And these acquisitions raise a very fundamental question — is it possible for Google to be both an unbiased search engine and at the same time own a vast portfolio of web-based products and services? Does Google’s transformation create an inherent conflict of interest which threatens to stifle competition?

    In the last few years, Internet businesses that compete with Google’s new products and services have complained that Google is now behaving in a way contrary to free and fair competition. They allege that Google is trying to leverage its dominance in Internet search into key areas of Internet commerce where it stands to capture from its competitors billions of dollars in advertising revenue. Rather than fairly presenting search results, these critics claim that Google has begun to subtlety bias its search results in favor of its own services. This conduct has the potential to substantially harm competition for commerce on the Internet, and retard innovation by companies that fear the market power of Google.

    Antitrust scrutiny is not about picking winners and losers, but is about fostering a fully competitive environment so that consumers can fairly pick winners and losers. As more and more of our commerce moves to the Internet, it should be the highest priority of antitrust policymakers that the Internet remains a bastion of open and free competition as it has been since its founding. We need to protect the ability of the next Google to emerge, the next great website or application being developed in a garage in Silicon Valley or Madison, Wisconsin.

    Sincerely,
    Herb Kohl
    U.S. Senator

  • http://robertmaxim.com Robert Maxim

    Although I don’t believe for a second that Goggle is totally altruistic, could you imagine what search would be like if they didn’t “impose” some degree of influence over how search results where structured? I believe we are much better off for Google’s dominance. But letting them run wild without some degree of responsibility would be just reckless.

  • http://CellFoneAd.com Paul Seymour

    Makes perfect sense to me, if a business cant take the simple steps to optimize its site for mobile viewers it doesnt really deserve to succeed.
    People spend a fortune developing a website for the PC and forget about mobile users.
    This is a big mistake because with the growth of smartphones and other mobile devices e.g. tablets, the fastest growing method of accessing the net is on a mobile device. In fact by 2015 more internet pages will be viewed on a mobile device than via a desktop PC!
    A web page viewed on a mobile device appears completely than it does on a PC. It has to be optimized for a mobile device.
    That is what we do, produce mobile optimized websites. Each one is made exactly to the clients requirements. There is no download required compared to an App. The ones we produce for clients recognises if the web viewer is on a mobile device or not and directs them to the mobile website or regular version. It also recognizes what mobile device is being used and displays the site perfectly for it, important as there are currently 5,200+ device types.
    Last, but not least, there is very little cost involved in producing it!
    CellFoneAd

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom