Free Justin Bieber: Could Covering A Song On YouTube Land You In The Slammer?

Current Senate bill has sinister implications for online video

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:

Free Justin Bieber: Could Covering A Song On YouTube Land You In The Slammer?
[ Social Media]

A new campaign is using Justin Bieber to raise awareness about a current Senate bill that could have devastating effects on the YouTube community.

As of right now, there is a bill in the United States Senate that would penalize those who stream copyrighted materials over the internet. S.978 would make this action a felony, punishable with up to 5 years in prison.

Here’s the crux of the bill, as defined on Open Congress

Makes unauthorized web streaming of copyrighted content a felony with a possible penalty of up to 5 years in prison. Illegal streaming of copyrighted content is defined in the bill as an offense that “consists of 10 or more public performances by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copyrighted works” and has a total economic value, either to the copyright holder or the infringer, of at least $2,500.

The bill, introduced back in May by Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar and co-sponsored by Republican John Cornyn and Democrat Chris Coons, is supported by the MPAA, RIAA, Directors Guild, Screen Actors Guild and many more.

Some are quite concerned at the implications to the bill, saying that it could criminalize things that millions and millions of internet users do everyday. And here’s where Justin Bieber comes in.

Under the proposed law, you could spend time in jail for posting a video to YouTube of you covering a famous song, as long as it got more than 10 views in 6 months. The site freebieber.org explains it in this way:

This is a video of child celebrity Justin Bieber singing “With You” by the artist Chris Brown. YouTube videos like this one were what made him famous. Tons of kids do this for fun, and many now-popular artists got started in this same way.

Copyright law is so extreme, just singing somebody else’s song in public could be infringement. Because he and his mother posted the videos to advance his music career, it’s commercial infringement. And a new bill would make this a felony.

The maximum sentence would be five-years, just for singing a cover! Other online video “crimes” could include: videos of a school play, a professional baseball game, or videos with incidental background music (even just a ringtone). Nuts, right?

They ask you to sign a petition against Senate bill 978,

If you remember that Justin Bieber’s path to superstardom began with some YouTube covers of Chris Brown songs, you see why they are using Bieber as a poster boy for this bill. It sounds crazy, but under the proposed new law they say that Bieber could be facing 5 years in prison.

Of course, chances are slim that we’ll ever see Bieber in jail (until he hits his rebellious Lindsay Lohan phase). And this website is a hyperbolic but humorous way to raise awareness. But the implications of the bill are a bit disturbing. Imagine all the ways that it could alter the online video landscape.

Here’s a video about the campaign –

What do you guys think? Let us know in the comments.

Free Justin Bieber: Could Covering A Song On YouTube Land You In The Slammer?
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • John Sylkes

    Copyrights are out of control. Content producers cry their little eyes out about how poor they would be without copyrights, but fashion designers seem to do just fine. Copyright law needs to turn the other way—to fewer restrictions. If someone thinks they can take a Beatles song and make it better, let em try and I’m sure the market will sort them out just fine.

    Sadly, though, last time I checked, common sense doesn’t have a powerful lobby on the Hill. Go-go-free-market Republicans seem to like this kind of pro-business regulation.

    • http://twitter.com/RatedRepublican The Rated Republican Superstar

      There are people in both parties that support or oppose this proposed legislation. Would Jesus Christ sue millions for abusing his copyright on the crucifixion? I doubt it since he was crucified for illegally file sharing the loaves and fishes.

  • Chris

    Don’t blaim me, I voted for Mark Kennedy.

  • Chilly8

    Justin Bieber lives in Canada, so he is not subject to this law. As long as he uses a service that is not hosted in the United States, he can do pretty much what he wants, since US laws do not apply in Canada, so he has nothing to worry about until Canada passes a similar law.

  • Chilly8

    I am surprised that Congress has not taken up the issue of circumventing geoblocking, in the current set copyright bills. Neither the Commercial Felony Streaming Act or the Protect IP Act address the issue of VPN services that tout circumvention of geoblocking.

    I would not be surprised if a bill is introduced in the 113th Congress in 2013. I think that will be the next issue Congress addresses.

  • Keith Jackson

    This is pitiful! I wish they wouldn’t pass this here bill! I like the internet and YouTube the way it was! Now, there’s CISPA! See if you can stop that bill, too!

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom