ObamaCare’s Birth Control Mandate Divides Supreme Court

The issue of ObamaCare’s birth control policy is currently dividing the Supreme Court. The conflict revolves around a religious nonprofit objection to paying for an insurance plan covering contraception. Generally the issue also touches on health care, abortion, and religious freedom. The eight Justices will be deciding on whether institutions that are religiously affiliated can […]
ObamaCare’s Birth Control Mandate Divides Supreme Court
Written by Val Powell

The issue of ObamaCare’s birth control policy is currently dividing the Supreme Court. The conflict revolves around a religious nonprofit objection to paying for an insurance plan covering contraception.

Generally the issue also touches on health care, abortion, and religious freedom. The eight Justices will be deciding on whether institutions that are religiously affiliated can be exempted from having to pay for birth control and other reproductive health coverage in their ObamaCare health plans.

The 90-minute debate grew tense as the Justices discussed ideological differences over moral and administrative implications of the law.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in a recent statement that an exception for Little Sisters of the Poor, a Catholic charity of nuns involved in the issue, could make the law impractical.

However, Chief Justice John Roberts countered the statement by arguing that the religious nonprofit and other petitioners’ mechanism against the birth control mandate can be used to provide services because the government still wants continuous coverage.

The Little Sisters of the Poor are led by nuns but they also employ lay workers who could be eligible for the exemption from paying birth control and other reproductive health coverage if they win. Other possible groups and establishments to be included in the exemption are hospitals, parochial schools, and private faith-based universities.

However, a 4-4 split amongst the Justices could leave the provision in place for now. The death of Justice Antonin Scalia has left the legal fight about the birth control mandate up in the air.

Other appeals courts have agreed that the accommodation offered to religious groups is lawful. However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit says that it violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993.

By definition, birth control is prescribed not only to avoid pregnancy but also to treat various female medical conditions.

Subscribe for Updates

Newsletter

By signing up for our newsletter you agree to receive content related to ientry.com / webpronews.com and our affiliate partners. For additional information refer to our terms of service.
Get the WebProNews newsletter delivered to your inbox

Get the free daily newsletter read by decision makers

Subscribe
Advertise with Us

Ready to get started?

Get our media kit

Advertise with Us