Quantcast

Has The Knowledge Graph Made Google Better At Search?

Perhaps The Knowledge Graph Should Be Called The "Best Guess Graph"

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:


[ Search]

Sometimes Google’s Knowledge Graph is inaccurate. Google knows it’s not perfect, and provides a “feedback/more info” link at the bottom of Knowledge Graph results, which you can click to let Google know what it has wrong, if you believe there is an error. Of course, there’s no guarantee that Google will acknowledge your feedback or that you’ll hear back from them with any quickness.

Have you noticed errors in Google’s Knowledge Graph? Let us know in the comments.

Quality of the “knowledge” within the Knowledge Graph has been a question from the beginning. We asked Google after it launched how susceptible it would be to Wikipedia vandalism, given that Wikipedia is a major source of the info provided to the Knowledge Graph (though it’s only one of a variety of sources). At the time, a Google spokesperson told us, “I can’t share a ton of detail here, but we’ve got quality controls in place to try to mitigate this kind of issue. We’ve also included a link so users can tell us when we may have an inaccuracy in our information.”

“Our goal is to be useful; we realize we’ll never be perfect, just as a person’s or library’s knowledge is never complete,” he said. “But we will strive to be accurate. More broadly, this is why we engineer 500+ updates to our algorithms every year — we’re constantly working to improve search, and to make things easier for our users.”

Google is showing Knowledge Graph results for a whole lot of searches these days, and continues to expand the product all the time. Earlier this month, Google announced its expansion into more languages. You have to wonder how many errors are out there. It’s one thing for Google to try to deliver the best results in terms of other sites, but this is the information that is supposed to be “knowledge”.

Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable points to a Google forum thread where somebody claiming to be the agent for NFL player Nick Eason found an error with the player’s Knowledge Graph entry, and asked to have it corrected:

I am writing to get some information removed from one of my Client’s biogrpahy’s that is sponsored by Google. When you search the name, NICK EASON in Google, a little biogprahy box comes up under his picture and under the Wikipedia blurb.

Nick is no longer married and desperately wants his Spouse tab removed. Can you please let me know the most efficeient and effective way to get this done? Thanks!

Nick Eason Knowledge Graph

By the time this article was first written, it had remained unchanged, but Google has since fixed it.

Wikipedia appears to be the main source of Google’s “knowledge” about Eason. That’s the only source Google has labeled, anyway. When we checked, Eason’s Wikipedia page had no mention of his marriage or Regina Eason, who Google’s result said was his spouse (before finally updating it).

As Schwartz writes, “With web search, the results can be within minutes updated – extremely fresh. But the knowledge graph, if it needs an update, it can take months and months.”

A lot can change in that amount of time, obviously. Google, per its mission statement, wants to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible, but the ways in which it has been able to address the timeliness and/or freshness of data has left a great deal to be desired in recent years.

Google has placed such a great deal of emphasis on providing fresh search results, but then you have an example like this, where the result Google is actually emphasizing is simply outdated. Results, in general, have also become less fresh due to the lack of Google’s realtime search feature, which used to give you near-realtime content from Twitter as it appeared in the Twitterverse. This gave you fresh up to the second (or close to it at least) content about newsworthy topics right in your search results. Now, if you want that, you better just go to Twitter.

Meanwhile, Google is cramming organic search results with “fresh” content, often leaving more relevant content buried under the more recently written content. This was illustrated perfectly on the day of the Sandy Hook shooting, when reports came out that a person named Ryan Lanza was responsible for the horrible shooting in Newtown, Connecticut (granted, the killer was later reported to be Adam Lanza). If you tried searching Google for “Ryan Lanza,” you were likely getting little but few-minute-old reports, when you may have really been looking to find more about who this guy really was (a situation made even more confusing when media outlets started putting out photos and pointing to social media profiles for the wrong guy).

That has little to do with the Knowledge Graph, but it has everything to do with the relevance and usefulness of Google’s search results (which is being diminished in other areas of search as well).

One thing that’s mildly disturbing about this whole Knowledge Graph thing, in terms of the potential for errors, is that Google recently started including information about medications in the Knowledge Graph. This was an area of major concern as so-called “content farms” filled up Google’s search results with hardly credible articles about health issues. Google has made strides in that area, particularly with updates like Panda.

“This data comes from the U.S. FDA, the National Library of Medicine, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, among others,” said Google Search Senior Product Manager Aaron Brown of the recently added Knowledge Graph data. We hope you find this useful, but remember that these results do not act as medical advice.”

That last part is important.

Have Google’s search results gotten better since the launch of the Knowledge Graph? Have the results in general gotten better over the past year? Let us know what you think.

Has The Knowledge Graph Made Google Better At Search?
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • Sammy P

    Yes definitely.

    Here is the home page content of top ranking site for “website design bangalore” search phrase.

    ———-8<—————————

    To acquire the best designs for your website you can opt for the Web design Bangalore. The web designing Bangalore is well renowned for its quality and creativeness. The web designers Bangalore are well efficient and experienced to give the layout the client’s think in their mind. The sites created by website designers Bangalore will fetch enormous traffic and it increases the revenue of their clients. The Web design company Bangalore gives out the best designs and secured pages for their consumers.

    The web design companies bangalore are well equipped with all the latest technologies in today’s world. Thus the web designing company bangalore carry out any sort of web designing projects without any hesitation. Web designing companies bangalore develop the sites with utmost care and security so that the users who believe on the website design company Bangalore must be gratified because of their service. The web development companies Bangalore are not only well versed in the languages they also include the services of multimedia content. These unique features of web development company bangalore are the main reason for the fame they gain all around the world.

    The website designing bangalore is the best choice for a website initiator as the website design bangalore takes a full care right from the starting till the ending of the process. The php companies bangalore code the pages in astonishing manner as the algorithms and the coding done by them are unbeatable worldwide. The bangalore web design company are lending hands to all the other web related services. The internet marketing company bangalore are the best choice for marketing your products over the internet as they take out all the necessary steps for marketing your products and place your products in the right place so that they reach the summit of the production

    ———-8<—————————

    Amit Singhal and Matt Cutts are in acidic hallucinations about star dust fantasies…..

    or Google has become a paid piper which finds evil pleasure in misguiding users to wrong websites.

  • Crown

    knowledge graph = wikipedia scrapped content. I not sure what anybody interested in it, another autoscrapping ‘solution’ by google

  • Tag A. Long

    We are to take seriously a corporate “knowledge graph”?

    sure we will..

  • Alan

    Google Knowledge Graph === wikipedia copy paste. Here is no any original content. It just show us what google can use all blackhat methods, which we not able to use.

  • http://AmericanDoorsInc.com Richard Cruz

    American doors thinks you got to have knowledge to do knowledgeable things. Google is not that knowledgeable our company use to be on places they knocked us out and have not given us a reason
    we called numerous times they cannot give us an answer. we are a small company no need to pick on us. We have lost a lot of business in the 4 and a half months that Google is ignoring us . they are about as ignorant as possible. I promise you 1 thing Matt Cutts will know about us by years end. he will either make it worse for us because Google is evil in which they claim they aren’t. Or Make things better Which I personally think would be in their best interest because I’m going to write 100 letters if I have to.

  • http://www.jhunsinfotech.com/ Ajay Jhunjhunwala

    I also know that Google brings the information form Wikipedia. But what goes if it provides users something extra? Providing most updated information is little difficult because it depends on Wikipedia. Google is launching it other language also. I think google should take little more time before that. I request google to take more care in “feedback/more info”. If google is successful in implementing this “feedback/more info” reflects its outcome in Search Result Google Knowledge graph will be a wonderful and authentic source.

  • Jim

    Compare it to Bing, which one is better? I see more knowledge with Bing Snapshot than Google Knowledge Graph. I like it when Bing has fictional characters in its snapshot. Bing even has Social Connections in the snapshot, like Facbeook/LinkedIn/Twitter, super cool!

  • http://www.computaris.com Amit Dwivedi

    Excellent Article!
    This knowledge graph implementation is one of the best research by the Google Team. Hats of to Google for such a mind blowing information sharing section.

    Thanks,

  • http://liftchair.com Ken

    Google no longer brings up relevant, concise, specific information regarding your search query that is fast and to the point. The Google organic is just as tough as finding what you really want to know on godaddy. I anticipate a much larger market for category specific search in the near future. Everyone shopping for something does not simply have a wad of cash they want to expend on impulse purchases or tangential items. And, none of us like insulting spammy goofy stuff on major websites that want to dabble with the power of getting anything up because of their page rank. For instance this totally hyper-wordy link comes up if you search “rash on my foot”, http://www.healthboards.com/boards/allergies/206203-please-help-me-diagnose-my-rash-im-going-out-my-mind.html

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom