You have a typo before the word satirical.

While I don’t believe the sky is falling for FaceBook, it will be VERY interesting to see how this plays out.

I agree with Mixio facebook is a different animal than myspace. I don’t much care for what google did to Youtube. It was much better before they bought it. Big companies do that all the time. Adobe did the same to CS3 Ultra. Bought it and got rid of it.

I know Google will be better than “the other” social networks. I’m sure they had a plan for a long time before we found out about it. I used to have a Myspace page until several hacking attempts were made to access my page and Myspace deleted my account because of it. All the hard work I did – gone! Facebook has too much control over the friends you can have. I think change is google…

I agree entirely. Thank you for bringing these humorous images together in one place.

With pleasure and reading articles on your site, indeed subscribed to the news that’s too bad that there is no Russian version.

What happened to myspace wasn’t facebook but by mysapce. They changed their website that made many people unhappy so they left. Also, I purposely use an older computer, an Inspiron 1520, and my dsl connection at the house is slow, as fast as it can be. With the combination of the slow internet and the older computer, the new myspace freezes up my computer. In my research, I discovered that those 2 reasons are why people are leaving the new myspace. It may look nice but it’s non functional or has a different function then what others were use to. Even the fastest computer, with the fastest internet connection, runs into problems with the new myspace. Most people are not aware that every program on their computer fights for bandwidth and thus slows it down. When you add streaming programs and shareware, the fastest internet connection is slowed down considerably for just everyday use. Facebook with it’s simplicity and ease of use, makes it the most suitable application for what it is intended for. Google, on the other hand, does everything and does it better than everyone else. However, their marketing sucks. Google’s main disadvantage is that they think that just because they have it then the world will know. Yet, they have so many excellent features that most everyday people have no clue of. I bet even on this forum you can go to Google and find something you never new existed. I picked up the book Google for dummies and it was as think as a dictionary. Funny, the kings of information search lack discovery. However, there is a lot of word out on Google + so maybe it will do good but I don’t think it will replace facebook, well at lest not for 5 years and only if Google does a better job at marketing it then their other wonderful offerings.

It seems that the whole argument, in the short term, hinges on early adopters and newcomers. I’m sure we all still know a few lonely souls on MySpace, so presumably there’ll always be those people who are comfortable where they live online and won’t easily budge. Newcomers will naturally flow to that brand which offers the most value, for which G+ has the most flexibility to offer leading-edge features without alienating an existing giant user-base. In the end, there’s always that democratic satisfaction of favoring the brand that listens and cares. Hopefully G+ will light a fire under Facebook to up it’s game!

It all depends on Facebook’s next move. Google does have technical advantages. But that’s not enough, unless Facebook’s next move sucks.