Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Google Panda Update: eHow Untouched, Says Pleased with Progress on Content Quality

Demand Media: We'll talk about this more during earnings call

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 5 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. What I dont understand is why online resource sites like e-how are affected negatively after a panda update.

    • You should read some of the eHow articles. My favorite is the multiple articles that tell you how to drink water. How can you wonder with topics like that? Or how about medical advice? Wouldn’t you love to be scared that you could be infected with a disease and you get into a car accident because you were rushing to the hospital thinking you’re going to die soon? All because eHow noticed how certain diseases were being heavily searched for and decided instead of publishing information from a real doctor, they would hire somebody in the Philippines at $2 an hour to create an article created for getting on page 1 of search results on Google. If they were a doctor, I’d say, ok, the article might have real information, but usually it’s pieced together from other information which may or may not be correct that was gathered from the internet. That’s their only reason for being in business. Not to actually give people a place to publish something, but so that no matter what is published, right or wrong, it ends up giving them one more page to grab traffic and ad revenue.

  2. Here in Israel the Panda update did a little mess with the SERP, sure hope it will eventually clear out.

  3. I remember reading in the newspaper earlier this year about Google releasing their content farm update. In the article they had an example about someone who was searching for specific information about a medical procedure, and a low quality eHow article was the #1 ranked result. This was what Google was trying to prevent. Perhaps if eHow didn’t start cleaning up their site, the hit to them would have been bigger.

  4. It has been a huge matter of controversy over which sites were affected by the update. It is positive to see sites take actions to recover but many people still feel that their sites have been unfairly penalised by the panda update.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>