Quantcast

Corporations Supporting CISPA Include Facebook, Microsoft

How different is CISPA from SOPA?

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:


Corporations Supporting CISPA Include Facebook, Microsoft
[ Technology]

Is this how unwanted Internet regulation passes? When enough popular web-based/tech corporations support a bill that’s potentially as damaging as SOPA, causing their legion of followers to accept the inevitable? If so, there’s a really good chance the backlash SOPA experienced could be a thing of past, at least in regards to the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA).

The question is, which corporations are supporting the bill, making is such a viable option to its SOPA/PIPA predecessors? Thanks to the openness of the U.S. Government, we have a list of CISPA supporters, and after the SOPA backlash, some of names might surprise you:

AT&T
Boeing
BSA
Business Roundtable
CSC
COMPTEL
CTIA – The Wireless Association
Cyber, Space & Intelligence Association
Edison Electric
EMC
Exelon
Facebook
The Financial Services Roundtable
IBM
Independent Telephone & Telecommunications Alliance
Information Technology Industry Council
Intel
Internet Security Alliance
Lockheed Martin
Microsoft
National Cable & Telecommunications Association
NDIA
Oracle
Symantec
TechAmerica
US Chamber of Commerce
US Telecom – The Broadband Association
Verizon

The links go to the individual letters of support, and as you might’ve noticed, Facebook, a company that was outspoken against SOPA, is on the CISPA supporters list. Their letter of support includes the following:

Effective security requires private and public sector cooperation, and successful cooperation necessitates information sharing. Your legislation removes burdensome rules that currently can inhibit protection of the cyber ecosystem, and helps provide a more established structure for sharing within the cyber community while still respecting the privacy rights and expectations of our users. Through timely sharing of threat information, both public and private entities will be able to more effectively combat malicious activity in cyberspace and protect consumers.

As you can see, Facebook’s rationale for supporting CISPA is protecting consumers and combating malicious Internet activity. Furthermore, there letter of support does not mention intellectual property protection or protecting the entertainment industry from piracy. With that in mind, does this mean CISPA is nothing like SOPA and the reaction against it is misguided?

Not exactly.

On surface, CISPA focuses on the sharing of important cybersecurity information between government officials and companies the information could effect. But, the bill goes further, including portions about protecting intellectual property that remind some of SOPA and PIPA. An example from the actual bill (H.R. 3523):

(2) CYBER THREAT INTELLIGENCE- The term `cyber threat intelligence’ means information in the possession of an element of the intelligence community directly pertaining to a vulnerability of, or threat to, a system or network of a government or private entity, including information pertaining to the protection of a system or network from–

`(A) efforts to degrade, disrupt, or destroy such system or network; or

`(B) theft or misappropriation of private or government information, intellectual property, or personally identifiable information.

And this is far from the only mention of IP in the bill. If an IP thief is considered a threat to cyber security and intelligence, can anyone foresee a scenario where a website like The Pirate Bay would be viewed as a threat and blocked from U.S. web users, if not altogether taken down by a multinational task force?

Or, as Andrew Couts described it in his “CISPA is not the new SOPA: Here’s why” article:

CISPA is a terrible piece of legislation, one that very well could result in the government blocking access to websites on the basis of copyright infringement, or sites like Wikileaks under the guise of national security.

With that in mind, perhaps CISPA is more like SOPA than we first thought. The big difference is, companies like Facebook and Microsoft are not opposed to CISPA like they were PIPA/SOPA. Does that kind of support change your view about these kinds of bills or are you against any kind of “cyberspace” regulation that gives more control to the U.S. government?

I know what Julia O’Dwyer’s answer would be

Corporations Supporting CISPA Include Facebook, Microsoft
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • http://www.renocomputerservices.com Scott Morris

    Of course it is SOPA 2.0. What? Did you think they were just going to give up after we beat back the last attack on our freedom. They have millions, if not billions of dollars already invested or at stake in terms of future earnings.

    After ACTA was passed in the EU it doesn’t matter much anyway. The past two administrations have taken orders on an international level, ignoring the due process afforded congress by the constitution. So if the EU is demanding laws be enforced here on our shores, do you think the administration would hesitate to oblige?

  • The Bolem

    I think there’s still a chance to stop the EU from ratifying ACTA: If you’re and EU citizen, keep contacting your representatives until they get how much damage it would do.

    As for CISPA, the lack of corporate opposition just means we all have to get off our butts and contact our representatives about this even more than last time.

    Any Republicans reading this, please tell your favorite candidates and pundits that CISPA and the ISP 6 Strikes Rule are all an extension of a backroom deal between Obama and Chris Dodd to have liberal Hollywood take away our first and 4th Amendment rights; that’ll do more damage than bringing up gas prices and his stupid birth certificate!

  • Skyre

    I’m getting rather irate with the fact the US government seems to think it has the right to interfere with the rights of others, even people outside of the US.

    What gives the US the right to demand people be sent to the US to face charges for laws that were broken in the US, but not in the peoples home country?
    What gives the US the right to place laws that ruin the security and privacy of people in foreign countries?

    Nothing gives the US those rights. Which is why we all hate the US.

    Get out of my country. The US government is not welcome here.

  • Josh

    http://freeuntodeath.wordpress.com/

    Please check out this new blog, and pass it around.
    Together we can beat the greed and overcome this crisis.

  • ashok pai

    This leads me to conclude that US corporations are never to be trusted. people of the free world (non US) need to rely less of US based services, develop their own services. companies like microsoft/ facebook are a threat to the free world since these companies have one back door that gives direct access to US government. this is like outsourcing spying activities of the government to private entities!

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom