1974 Farmhouse Slaying: Threat Of A Hung Jury?

By: Toni Matthews-El - January 29, 2014

Jury deliberations began last Thursday in the case against Robert “Gene” Pilcher. The 67-year-old was accused of the 1974 slaying of a 17-year-old girl in his cousin’s Iowa farmhouse.

It has not been easy going. Earlier this week the jury announced that they were not able to reach a verdict in the first degree murder case. On Tuesday, Judge Richard Meadows instructed the jury to continue deliberating.

Pilcher, who is accused of shooting and killing Mary Jayne Jones, maintains his innocence.

Law enforcement linked him to the killing when his DNA was discovered at the crime scene—Police recovered semen on a blanket that had been found underneath the victim’s body.

Pilcher claims that the blanket contains semen from an consensual sexual encounter and that it does not prove he had anything to do with Jones’s murder.

He also states that aside from that key piece of evidence, there is nothing linking him to the murder or any proof that he is the killer.

Pilcher was convicted of sodomy and perjury two years ago in a separate case, one with ties to the very bedroom where the teenage waitress was found dead. A woman testified that a mere three days before the victim’s body was discovered, she taken into the room by Pilcher, handcuffed and forced to perform oral sex acts.

Prosecutors in this case are banking on jurors questioning the odds: How is it that a woman comes to be sexually assaulted and held captive in the same room a the body of a woman is found in in, lying on blankets containing his semen?

Despite the prosecutions insistence, the jury continues to struggle, a fact that cannot be ignored. The semen, while linking Pilcher to the scene, may not be enough to link him to the murder. The lack of a confession and direct murder evidence may make it hard for the jury to reach a guilty verdict.

Still, the evidence, direct and circumstantial, is enough to point in the direction of possible guilt, which explains the jury’s inability to decide one way or the other.

If the jury is unable to reach a unanimous decision at all, it would result in a hung jury.

Image via KTVO TV

About the Author

Toni Matthews-ElToni Matthews-El hails from the land of chunked pumpkins and people who come to a complete stop before making any and every turn. When she isn't contributing articles to WebProNews, she spends her time freelance writing, cheering Liverpool FC, and enjoying life as a hair flower connoisseur. Disclaimer: Written opinions do not necessarily reflect that of WebProNews or its affiliates

View all posts by Toni Matthews-El
  • Reality

    Prosecutors lie and stretch the truth so much. I was in a case once and a prosecutor used a screen name of a woman and said it belonged to a child. The screen name had the word "girl" in it and the prosecutor never bothered to investigate who it belonged to. The woman in her 40s just always called herself a girl.

    I never believe prosecutors. They simply lie and force pleas. In this case, we don't even know if the woman liked being handcuffed and was into kinky sex. Lots of women are freaks. Also, DNA is everywhere and on anything. That is why the Innocence Project has a backlog of several hundred DNA cases. Many people get wrongly convicted from DNA.