Elon Musk’s X has agreed to review suspected illegal hate speech and terrorist material flagged by UK users within 24 hours on average. The commitments, accepted Friday by Britain’s media regulator Ofcom, mark a notable shift after months of pressure. They arrive amid fresh concerns that dangerous content continues to spread on major platforms.
Under the deal, X will assess at least 85 percent of such reports through its dedicated UK illegal content tool within 48 hours at most. The company will also block UK access to accounts it determines are run by or on behalf of terrorist groups banned in Britain. And it will share performance data with Ofcom every three months for the next year. These steps, if followed, would give British users some of the platform’s strongest safeguards worldwide.
Ofcom launched its compliance review last December. The effort examined whether leading social networks maintain proper systems to handle reported illegal hate and terror posts. Evidence came from groups including the Antisemitism Policy Trust, Center for Countering Digital Hate, Community Security Trust, HOPE not hate and Tech Against Terrorism. Their findings painted a troubling picture.
“We have evidence that terrorist content and illegal hate speech is persisting on some of the largest social media sites,” said Oliver Griffiths, Ofcom’s online safety group director. He pointed to recent hate-motivated crimes against Britain’s Jewish community. Those include the October 2025 attack at Heaton Park Synagogue in Manchester, an incident in Golders Green in April 2026, and arson attempts on Jewish sites in London. “This is of particular importance in the UK following a number of recent hate motivated crimes,” Griffiths added.
The commitments also require X to consult experts on improving its reporting systems. Some organizations had complained that multiple alerts about illegal material went unacknowledged. They simply didn’t know if reports reached the company or prompted any review. X’s pledge to engage aims to close that loop.
Yet the agreement stops short of a formal finding of noncompliance. It focuses exclusively on user-reported content. Questions remain about proactive detection, the role of automation versus human moderators, and overall resourcing. X’s safety team has drawn criticism for being smaller than those at rival firms. The Verge reported that the measures appear vague on these points.
Griffiths struck a measured tone. “These commitments are a step forward, but there’s a lot more to do.” His team will monitor X closely. The regulator continues a broader program reviewing how quickly platforms act once aware of illegal material. A separate investigation into X’s Grok AI and its systems for handling illegal content remains open. That probe, launched earlier this year, follows outcry over the chatbot’s role in generating sexualized deepfake images.
Imran Ahmed, chief executive of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, linked the progress to sustained advocacy after the Heaton Park attack. Danny Stone, head of the Antisemitism Policy Trust, called the changes “a good start” but said X was “still failing in so many regards” to address racism. Tech Against Terrorism welcomed the focus on proscribed organizations and pledged to watch delivery closely.
This episode highlights the tensions Musk’s platform faces in regulated markets. Since acquiring Twitter in 2022 and rebranding it as X, Musk has championed free speech. He has repeatedly criticized content moderation efforts as censorship. The UK’s Online Safety Act, now in force, demands risk assessments and swift action against illegal material. Fines can reach 10 percent of global revenue. In extreme cases, regulators could seek court orders to block access.
So far X has avoided the harshest penalties. The quarterly reporting period will test whether the pledges translate into measurable change. Ofcom plans large-scale analysis of response times across platforms. Other regulators watch closely. The European Union has opened its own inquiries into X over hate speech and Grok. Australia and Singapore have pressed the company on similar issues.
For all the scrutiny, X remains a key public square. Millions of Britons use it for news, debate and real-time information. Terrorist groups and extremists have long exploited social media. The platform’s algorithms once amplified controversy; under Musk, changes to verification and reduced moderation fueled accusations that harmful content gained new reach.
Friday’s announcement does not resolve every concern. It does signal that persistent regulatory engagement can extract concessions. Griffiths credited civil society organizations for their evidence and ongoing scrutiny. “We’re grateful for the support we’ve received from civil society and other expert organisations to scrutinise these platforms, and we’ll continue working with them extensively to drive forward changes for people in the UK.”
Whether X meets its new targets will become clear in the data. The first quarterly report will arrive in three months. Success could ease tensions. Failure might invite tougher enforcement. For now the commitments stand as a pragmatic accommodation between a regulator determined to enforce the law and a company wary of overreach.
But the work is unfinished. Griffiths said as much. Persistent illegal content on social platforms poses real risks. Recent violence in Britain has sharpened the debate over what duty sites owe their users and their societies. X’s latest promises represent one response. They do not mark the end of the conversation.
WebProNews is an iEntry Publication