In the high-stakes arena of digital visibility, a fierce debate rages over whether traditional Search Engine Optimization (SEO) suffices amid the rise of AI-driven answers, or if new disciplines like Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) demand separate playbooks. Recent analyses suggest the industry edges toward convergence, recognizing overlaps even as engines evolve. “The debate about AEO/GEO centers on whether it’s a subset of SEO, a standalone discipline, or just standard SEO,” writes Roger Montti in Search Engine Journal.

Critics decry GEO and AEO as repackaged SEO tactics peddled by novices. Harpreet Singh Chatha of Harps Digital listed myths to abandon in 2025, including LLMs.txt and claims that AEO/GEO bears no relation to SEO. Veteran Greg Boser, a founder of SEOs since 1996, tweeted: “We don’t need to come up with a bunch of new acronyms… All that needs to happen is we all agree to change the ‘E’ in SEO from ‘Engine’ to ‘Experience’.” Such sentiments echo Google’s stance, with executives like Danny Sullivan asserting good SEO drives AI Overview rankings.

Proponents counter that AI shifts ranking from pages to passages. Microsoft notes in a blog: “In AI search, ranking still happens, but it’s less about ordering entire pages and more about which pieces of content earn a place in the final answer.” Perplexity AI’s Jesse Dwyer highlights “sub-document processing,” indexing granular snippets over whole pages.

Backlash Against New Labels

The anti-GEO pushback stems partly from inexperienced voices hawking spammy methods. “It’s not lost on the SEO community that some of the loudest voices are fresh out of college and have zero experience,” Montti observes. Yet client demand persists, forcing practitioners to adapt. Manick Bhan of Search Atlas argues SEO historically meant Google optimization, but LLMs vary: “GEO is not just SEO with a fresh coat of paint… the machines we’re optimizing for have” changed in retrieval, fusion, recency, and trust.

Googlers like Robby Stein, Danny Sullivan, and John Mueller insist SEO remains vital, as AI backfills from top-ranked sites. OpenAI’s recent content strategist hire emphasized SEO, not GEO. Still, a Search Engine Land recap notes Google downplayed GEO, fueling the identity crisis.

On X, Glenn Gabe amplified the critique: “The inability to articulate AEO/GEO from SEO… many proponents fail to differentiate it from standard SEO.” Lily Ray of Amsive Digital framed it as evolved Online Reputation Management, claiming profiles on YouTube, Reddit, and Wikipedia—longtime SEO practices.

Overlaps in Core Tactics

Practices branded as GEO/AEO often mirror SEO: answer-focused content since 2014’s Featured Snippets, tight paragraphs for mobile, headings, and structured data. Microsoft’s October 2025 post stresses “fresh, authoritative, structured, and semantically clear” content atop crawlability and backlinks. A Digiday explainer clarifies: GEO/AEO ensures AI crawlers answer complex queries directly, measured not by clicks but citations.

Emerging distinctions include citations from authoritative sites, boosting informational pages despite agentic AI threats. Ecommerce shines in Microsoft’s January 2026 guide, “From Discovery to Influence: A Guide to AEO and GEO”. Benchmarks from Conductor urge tracking citations as KPIs alongside structured content.

Industry voices like a16z declare “SEO is slowly losing its dominance. Welcome to GEO,” emphasizing citation over gaming algorithms. Yet Search Engine Land counters: “Good SEO is good GEO,” as both reward clarity and authority.

AI Engines Reshape Retrieval

AI’s sub-document focus demands clarity for passage extraction. Semrush’s 2025 study shows AI answer traffic converts 4.4x better than organic clicks, per SEOProfy. Tools like Otterly and Profound track LLM visibility, addressing measurement gaps where 62% of SEOs report AI driving under 5% revenue, per Aleyda Solis’s survey in Search Engine Land.

Beyond Google, fragmentation hits: ChatGPT uses Bing, Perplexity granular snippets. Lenny Rachitsky hosted Ethan Smith of GraphiteGrowth, noting AEO yields 6x conversions, with Reddit comments and YouTube videos topping tactics. “Early-stage startups can win at AEO immediately,” unlike SEO’s long ramp.

Moz’s Lily Ray at MozCon 2025 separated fact from fiction: Many GEO ideas evolve longstanding SEO. Ladybugz predicts 2026 hybrid strategies integrating all three for SERPs, voice, and AI responses.

Path to Unified Visibility

Consensus crystallizes around hybrid approaches. Arc Intermedia states: “A successful digital marketing strategy in 2026… will address all three simultaneously,” leveraging overlaps. Marketing Dive calls AEO/GEO “essential operational disciplines,” akin to SEO two decades ago.

Practitioners prioritize entity clarity, original research, schema, and off-site mentions. Search Engine Land‘s GEO guide shifts to “representation signals”: AI must grasp who you are. Backlinko notes CMOs ignore labels, focusing on AI responses in ChatGPT or Perplexity.

The transition persists, with no settled playbook. Montti concludes: “Optimization is no longer aimed at a single system… SEO is in transition.” As engines fuse sources differently, insiders blend tactics, measure citations, and experiment—ensuring visibility across fragmented discovery channels.