Saks Global Enterprises, the conglomerate behind Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman, is poised to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as early as Sunday, thrusting the luxury retail sector into fresh turmoil. Sources familiar with the matter told Reuters that the filing hinges on finalizing a debtor-in-possession financing package exceeding $1 billion, aimed at sustaining operations amid a mounting debt crisis. The move follows a missed $100 million interest payment on December 30, tied to the company’s $2.7 billion acquisition of Neiman Marcus in 2024.

The 158-year-old retailer’s descent underscores broader pressures battering high-end department stores, where aspirational spending has waned amid persistent inflation and economic headwinds. New York Post reported that Saks lacks a comprehensive restructuring plan at filing time, hoping to assemble one in coming weeks, though timing remains fluid. Leadership upheaval marked the chaos: CEO Marc Metrick departed last week after a decade, with Executive Chairman Richard Baker reclaiming the role he held pre-merger.

Merger Ambitions Unravel in Sales Slump

The Saks-Neiman Marcus merger, billed as a powerhouse to rival online disruptors and peers like Nordstrom, instead amplified financial strain. Reuters detailed how the deal saddled Saks with debt just as luxury sales faltered, with revenues tumbling 13% in the quarter ended August 2. Consumers, squeezed by tariffs and uncertainty, curtailed big-ticket purchases, leaving stores with excess inventory and vendors demanding cash upfront.

Baker, a real estate investor with a track record of retail interventions, had envisioned synergies from combining the chains’ 70-plus locations. Yet, CNBC noted investor reluctance to fund a bankruptcy process, citing repayment risks and frustration with management. Saks has pursued asset sales, including offloading the Beverly Hills Neiman Marcus site to Ashkenazy Acquisition Corp. last week and shuttering a San Francisco Saks outpost in May 2025.

Cash Crunch Forces Desperate Financing Hunt

Securing debtor-in-possession loans emerged as the linchpin, with Bloomberg reporting creditors negotiating terms to keep doors open and settle overdue vendor bills. Earlier efforts yielded $600 million from bondholders last summer, alongside attempts to divest a Bergdorf Goodman minority stake. Layoffs slashed 790 positions across 2025, per company disclosures.

Posts on X amplified shopper panic, with users urging others to redeem Saks credits amid fears of store closures. Business Insider chronicled a tumultuous year: vendor pullbacks, missed payments and a failed rescue blueprint. Fox Business highlighted the looming $100 million debt deadline as the tipping point, rendering bankruptcy inevitable given Saks’ liquidity void.

Leadership Shakeup Signals Deeper Woes

Baker’s return as CEO drew scrutiny, given his history with struggling chains. Fortune pointed to prior ventures that faltered, questioning if the merger’s scale overwhelmed operational fixes. The Guardian covered Metrick’s exit, noting Baker’s interim grip as Saks races against cash burn.

Operational metrics paint a grim picture: comparable sales declines persisted despite digital pushes and store refreshes. TheStreet warned of potential liquidation risks if financing falters, echoing Neiman Marcus’s own 2020 filing. Puck’s analysis flagged Saks’ vulnerability versus resilient peers like Aritzia in the U.S. market.

Investor Frustrations Boil Over

Tensions peaked as lenders balked at terms, per Fox Business. Sources described acrimonious talks, with Saks’ PJT Partners advising on a path forward. The Wall Street Journal, in earlier coverage, flagged the missed payment as a covenant breach accelerating default.

Vendor relations soured, with some halting shipments, exacerbating inventory gaps during holiday peaks. CNBC’s January 1 report detailed the $100 million shortfall’s origins in Neiman debt, compounded by post-merger integration costs. As filing nears, stakeholders eye court-supervised restructuring to shed liabilities while preserving brands.

Asset Maneuvers and Broader Fallout

Saks’ real estate pivots, like the Beverly Hills leaseback, underscore balance-sheet triage. The Guardian linked CEO churn to the crisis’s severity. X sentiment reflected urgency, with New York Post posts on spending credits going viral, tallying millions of views.

Chapter 11 could enable Saks to renegotiate leases and vendor terms, potentially emerging leaner. Yet, analysts via Reuters question if luxury demand rebounds suffice. The saga tests Baker’s revival playbook amid a sector reckoning.