As the clock ticks down to November 13, 2025, thousands of organizations running PostgreSQL 13 face a critical deadline. This version of the world’s most advanced open-source database is approaching its end-of-life (EOL), meaning no more security patches, bug fixes, or official support from the PostgreSQL Global Development Group. For industry insiders managing mission-critical systems, this isn’t just a routine update—it’s a potential vulnerability nightmare.
According to a recent blog post by Percona, the urgency stems from PostgreSQL’s five-year support cycle for major versions. Released in September 2020, PostgreSQL 13 introduced features like improved indexing and partitioning, but its time is up. Jobin Augustine, principal support engineer at Percona, warns, “After this date, the PostgreSQL Global Development Group will stop releasing security patches and bug fixes for this version.”
The Risks of Sticking with Legacy Versions
Running an unsupported database version exposes systems to unpatched vulnerabilities. In an era of escalating cyber threats, this could lead to data breaches or downtime. A Medium article by Pankaj Aswal, published October 2025, emphasizes, “The Clock is Ticking for Your Database Security,” highlighting that without updates, PostgreSQL 13 users risk compliance issues and performance degradation.
Historical precedents underscore the danger. For instance, when PostgreSQL 12 reached EOL in November 2024, organizations that delayed upgrades faced compatibility problems with newer applications. Percona notes that similar issues plagued PostgreSQL 10 and 11 users, leading to forced migrations under duress.
Security Implications in a Post-EOL World
The PostgreSQL project’s versioning policy, detailed on their official site, states that major versions receive support for five years, with minor releases every three months for bugs and security fixes. The latest minor release for version 13 was 13.21 in May 2025, as announced by the PostgreSQL Global Development Group.
Experts like those at Lansweeper Community warn that post-EOL, “no more updates, security patches, or fixes will be released.” This leaves databases open to exploits that could have been mitigated. In critical sectors like finance and healthcare, where data integrity is paramount, such risks are unacceptable.
Performance Gains in Newer PostgreSQL Releases
Upgrading isn’t just about avoiding risks—it’s an opportunity for gains. PostgreSQL 18, released in September 2025, boasts features like 3x faster queries and enhanced async I/O, as covered in Nihar Daily’s September 2025 news update. Posts on X from database engineers highlight real-world benefits, such as sequential scans dropping from 40 seconds to 12 seconds without tuning.
Percona recommends targeting PostgreSQL 16 or 17 for stability, noting improvements in vacuuming, JSON handling, and parallelism. Augustine advises, “The best time to start your PostgreSQL upgrade plan is today!” with strategies including logical replication for minimal downtime.
Step-by-Step Upgrade Strategies
A smooth upgrade begins with assessment. Tools like pg_upgrade allow in-place upgrades, but for large datasets, Percona suggests using pg_dump/pg_restore or logical replication tools like pglogical. Datavail’s blog on upgrading from PostgreSQL 12 to newer versions outlines strategies applicable here, emphasizing testing in staging environments.
Cloud users have additional options. Google Cloud’s extended support for EOL PostgreSQL versions, announced in InfoQ in June 2024, provides a bridge, but it’s not a long-term solution. Amazon RDS users should note that Aurora PostgreSQL 12 support ended in February 2025, per DZone, signaling a pattern for version 13.
Case Studies from the Field
Real-world migrations offer lessons. Figma scaled their PostgreSQL setup to infinite scalability by sharding in 2020, as detailed in a post by Dr. Milan Milanović on X, moving from a single RDS instance to a distributed system. Similarly, Stack Overflow reported huge index size reductions upon upgrading to PostgreSQL 13 in 2021, per Jeff Atwood’s X post, but now even they must move forward.
Recent X discussions, including from Percona and Planet PostgreSQL, stress proactive planning. One engineer shared woes of system updates breaking PostgreSQL without pg_upgrade, underscoring the need for careful package management during transitions.
Overcoming Common Upgrade Hurdles
Compatibility is a top concern. PostgreSQL 13’s deprecation of certain functions means reviewing application code. The official PostgreSQL documentation for release 13.20, dated August 14, 2025, lists final changes, advising migration to 13.20 first before jumping to newer versions.
Downtime minimization is key for enterprises. Blue-green deployments, as described in an X post by Prasad Ostwal, allowed seamless upgrades with zero interruption. Tools like PostgREST’s version 14, released November 2025, address performance in complex schemas, reducing cache build times from minutes to milliseconds.
Future-Proofing Your Database Infrastructure
Looking ahead, PostgreSQL 17.5 and 16.9 releases in May 2025 fixed critical issues, per the PostgreSQL news site. An out-of-cycle release in February 2025 addressed regressions, showing the project’s commitment to stability in supported versions.
Industry insiders should consider managed services. Percona’s support extends beyond community EOL, offering patches for older versions. As Augustine puts it, “Upgrading to a supported version ensures you continue to receive these vital updates, keeping your databases secure and performant.”
Economic and Operational Considerations
The cost of inaction can be steep. Downtime from exploits or forced upgrades often exceeds migration expenses. A Lansweeper Community post from two weeks ago urges scanning environments for version 13 instances, as undetected legacy systems amplify risks.
Training teams on new features is essential. PostgreSQL 18’s time travel queries via temporal extensions, as explained in Qian Li’s X post, enable advanced debugging—benefits unavailable in EOL versions.
Industry Sentiment and Best Practices
Sentiment on X reflects urgency, with posts from Hussein Nasser warning of partitioning pitfalls in version 13 that newer releases mitigate. Peter Zaitsev highlighted handy features like FORCE DROP DATABASE in 13, but emphasizes moving to versions with ongoing enhancements.
To excel, adopt a phased approach: audit, plan, test, execute, and monitor. Resources from Percona, PostgreSQL.org, and Medium provide blueprints for success, ensuring your database remains a robust foundation in 2025 and beyond.


WebProNews is an iEntry Publication