The smartphone industry is witnessing a potential seismic shift as OnePlus, once celebrated as the “flagship killer,” confronts mounting dissatisfaction among its core user base. According to a comprehensive survey conducted by Android Authority, nearly 60% of current OnePlus owners are contemplating switching to competing brands, marking what could be the most significant crisis in the company’s decade-long history.

The poll, which gathered responses from over 3,000 OnePlus users, reveals a dramatic erosion of brand loyalty that has long been the company’s competitive advantage. This disaffection stems from multiple factors: escalating prices that now rival premium competitors, perceived quality control issues, and what users describe as a departure from the company’s founding principles of delivering flagship specifications at mid-range prices. The data suggests that OnePlus’s aggressive pivot toward the premium segment may have alienated the enthusiast community that initially propelled the brand to prominence.

Founded in 2013 by former Oppo vice president Pete Lau and Carl Pei, OnePlus built its reputation on a simple promise: offer flagship-level performance at prices significantly below established players like Samsung and Apple. The strategy proved remarkably successful, cultivating a devoted following of tech enthusiasts who appreciated the company’s focus on specifications, clean software experience based on OxygenOS, and community engagement. However, the recent survey data indicates this carefully constructed relationship has deteriorated significantly.

The Price Premium Problem: When Value Champions Become What They Opposed

The most frequently cited reason for potential brand abandonment centers on pricing strategy. OnePlus devices that once launched at $299 to $499 now routinely exceed $1,000 for flagship models, placing them in direct competition with established premium manufacturers. The OnePlus 12, released in early 2024, carries a starting price of $799, while the OnePlus Open foldable commands $1,699—a far cry from the brand’s budget-conscious origins. Survey respondents expressed frustration that OnePlus no longer offers the value proposition that initially attracted them to the brand.

This pricing evolution reflects broader industry trends and OnePlus’s corporate ambitions. As The Verge reported in their coverage of the OnePlus 12 launch, the company has explicitly positioned itself as a premium player, emphasizing build quality, camera capabilities, and partnerships with Hasselblad. However, this repositioning appears to have created a vacuum in the value segment that competitors like Nothing (ironically co-founded by former OnePlus executive Carl Pei), Xiaomi, and even Google’s Pixel A-series have rushed to fill.

Software Controversy: The OxygenOS Merger That Fractured Community Trust

Beyond pricing concerns, the Android Authority survey identified software changes as a critical factor driving user dissatisfaction. OnePlus’s decision to merge OxygenOS with Oppo’s ColorOS—a consequence of both companies operating under the BBK Electronics corporate umbrella—has proven deeply unpopular among longtime users. What was once praised as a near-stock Android experience with thoughtful customizations has transformed into something users describe as bloated and less intuitive.

The merger, announced in 2021, was intended to streamline development resources and accelerate update delivery. According to Android Central, OnePlus executives argued the integration would enable faster security patches and longer support windows. In practice, however, users report increased pre-installed applications, interface changes that deviate from Android conventions, and performance inconsistencies that were rarely associated with earlier OxygenOS versions. The survey data suggests that approximately 45% of respondents cited software quality as a primary concern influencing their consideration of alternative brands.

This software controversy highlights a fundamental tension in OnePlus’s corporate structure. While maintaining brand independence in marketing and product design, the company’s technical integration with Oppo has become increasingly apparent. For users who valued OnePlus specifically for its differentiated software approach, this convergence represents a broken promise—one that survey respondents indicate may be irreparable.

Quality Control Questions: Manufacturing Issues Erode Premium Positioning

Perhaps most damaging to OnePlus’s premium aspirations are persistent reports of quality control problems. Survey respondents detailed experiences with display issues, including the infamous “green tint” problem that affected multiple OnePlus models, battery degradation, and hardware failures occurring within warranty periods. These concerns are particularly problematic for a brand attempting to justify flagship pricing—consumers expect premium reliability when paying premium prices.

GSMArena has documented numerous instances of display anomalies across OnePlus’s product line, with the OnePlus 8 Pro, OnePlus 9 Pro, and OnePlus 11 all experiencing various screen-related complaints. While OnePlus has addressed some issues through software updates and warranty replacements, the frequency of such problems has damaged the brand’s reputation for reliability. In premium segments dominated by manufacturers with decades of quality control refinement, these missteps prove costly.

The quality concerns extend beyond displays. Users have reported inconsistent camera performance despite the Hasselblad partnership, charging port failures, and software bugs that persist across multiple update cycles. For a company that once prided itself on meticulous attention to detail and community feedback, these issues represent a significant departure from founding principles.

The Competitive Vise: Squeezed Between Value and Premium Segments

OnePlus’s current predicament reflects a strategic miscalculation about market positioning. By abandoning the value segment without fully establishing credibility in the premium tier, the company finds itself vulnerable to competition from both directions. Samsung’s Galaxy S series and Apple’s iPhone continue to dominate premium sales through ecosystem integration, brand prestige, and retail presence that OnePlus cannot match. Meanwhile, brands like Xiaomi, Realme, and Nothing have seized the value-focused positioning OnePlus vacated.

According to market analysis from Counterpoint Research, OnePlus’s global market share has stagnated at approximately 2%, far below the growth trajectory the company projected when initiating its premium pivot. In contrast, Xiaomi maintains double-digit market share while offering comparable specifications at lower prices, and Apple continues expanding its premium segment dominance. The Android Authority survey data suggests OnePlus’s positioning problem is not merely statistical but reflects genuine consumer sentiment—users feel the brand offers neither the best value nor the best premium experience.

This competitive pressure intensifies in OnePlus’s critical markets. In India, where the brand achieved significant success, aggressive competition from Xiaomi, Realme, and Samsung has eroded market position. Business Standard reported that OnePlus slipped in Indian market rankings during Q3 2024, falling behind competitors that offer similar specifications at more competitive prices. In North America and Europe, where OnePlus has invested heavily in expansion, the brand struggles to differentiate itself from established premium manufacturers with superior retail networks and carrier relationships.

The Nothing Factor: When Your Co-Founder Becomes Your Competitor

Adding complexity to OnePlus’s challenges is the rise of Nothing, the company co-founded by Carl Pei after his 2020 departure from OnePlus. Nothing has explicitly positioned itself to capture the value-conscious enthusiast market that OnePlus once dominated, offering distinctive design, clean software, and aggressive pricing. The Nothing Phone (2), priced at $599, delivers flagship-adjacent specifications while maintaining the community-focused approach that characterized early OnePlus.

The irony is not lost on industry observers: OnePlus’s former executive has created a brand that competes directly with what OnePlus used to be, rather than what it has become. Wired interviewed Pei about Nothing’s strategy, and his comments about focusing on “what matters to users” and “not chasing specifications for their own sake” read as implicit criticism of OnePlus’s current direction. Survey respondents who indicated they were considering switching brands frequently mentioned Nothing as a potential alternative, suggesting Pei’s new venture is successfully capturing disillusioned OnePlus users.

Regional Variations: How Market-Specific Factors Influence Brand Loyalty

The Android Authority survey revealed significant regional variations in user satisfaction and switching intentions. In North America, where OnePlus has invested heavily in carrier partnerships and marketing, dissatisfaction rates reached 65%—higher than the global average. This may reflect the region’s mature smartphone market, where consumers have numerous alternatives and less tolerance for quality issues or poor value propositions.

European users expressed similar concerns, with 58% considering alternative brands. However, their primary complaints focused more heavily on software issues and update consistency rather than pricing alone. In contrast, Indian respondents—representing OnePlus’s historically strongest market—showed slightly lower switching intentions at 52%, though this still represents a majority of users considering departure. The regional variations suggest OnePlus faces different challenges in different markets, complicating any unified strategy to address user concerns.

The Path Forward: Can OnePlus Rebuild User Trust?

For OnePlus to reverse this trend of user dissatisfaction, the company faces difficult strategic choices. The survey data suggests users want a return to founding principles: competitive pricing, clean software experiences, and reliable hardware quality. However, OnePlus’s corporate integration with Oppo and its premium market ambitions may make such a reversal impossible without fundamental organizational changes.

Some industry analysts suggest OnePlus should embrace a dual-brand strategy, maintaining premium flagship devices while reintroducing a genuinely value-focused sub-brand. Others argue the company should fully commit to premium positioning, accepting that it will lose price-sensitive users while investing heavily in quality control, customer service, and brand building to compete effectively with Samsung and Apple. The Android Authority survey indicates that half-measures will likely fail—users want decisive action that addresses their specific concerns rather than incremental adjustments.

The smartphone industry has witnessed numerous brands rise and fall based on their ability to maintain user trust and deliver consistent value. Nokia, HTC, and LG all commanded significant market positions before strategic missteps led to decline or exit from the market. OnePlus’s current crisis, as revealed by the survey data, suggests the company stands at a similar crossroads. Whether it can navigate these challenges successfully will depend on its willingness to acknowledge user concerns, make difficult strategic choices, and potentially reconsider the premium pivot that has alienated its core community. With 60% of users considering alternatives, the window for corrective action is closing rapidly.