Ninth Circuit Rules Against Google: Android to Allow Rival App Stores

The Ninth Circuit upheld a ruling against Google in Epic Games' antitrust lawsuit, forcing Android to allow rival app stores and alternative billing for three years. This stems from Google's Play Store monopoly, promising developers lower fees and consumers more choices. Google plans appeals, citing security risks, amid broader industry shifts.
Ninth Circuit Rules Against Google: Android to Allow Rival App Stores
Written by Dave Ritchie

A Landmark Ruling Shakes Up Android’s App Ecosystem

In a pivotal decision that could reshape the mobile app market, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a lower court’s ruling against Google, mandating that the tech giant open its Android operating system to rival app stores. This outcome stems from a long-running antitrust lawsuit filed by Epic Games, the maker of Fortnite, which accused Google of maintaining an illegal monopoly through its Play Store. The appeals court affirmed the jury’s 2023 verdict, ordering Google to allow third-party app stores and alternative billing systems on Android devices for at least three years.

The ruling, detailed in coverage by Android Central, means that Epic Games can soon distribute its own Epic Games Store directly through Google’s Play Store. This development follows Epic’s successful challenge to Google’s practices, which included exclusive deals with developers and requirements for apps to be installed via the Play Store. Google has expressed disappointment and is considering further appeals, potentially to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Epic’s Antitrust Battle and Its Origins

The case originated in 2020 when Epic Games deliberately bypassed Google’s in-app payment system in Fortnite, leading to the game’s removal from the Play Store. Epic then sued, arguing that Google’s 30% commission on app sales and its control over distribution stifled competition. A federal jury sided with Epic in December 2023, finding Google guilty of antitrust violations. The Ninth Circuit’s affirmation, as reported by Reuters, rejected Google’s arguments that the changes would harm user security and developer interests.

Despite the win for Epic, Google has filed an emergency motion with the Ninth Circuit to delay the implementation, citing risks to platform integrity. The company argues that allowing sideloaded app stores could expose users to malware and complicate app updates. However, the court has set a November 1 deadline for Google to comply, including provisions to prevent anti-competitive deals with device makers.

Implications for Developers and Consumers

For developers, this ruling promises greater freedom. They can now offer apps through alternative stores without Google’s fees, potentially lowering costs and fostering innovation. Epic plans to launch its store on Android with a lower 12% commission, aiming to attract more creators. As noted in Android Headlines, this could lead to a more competitive environment, where users benefit from diverse app options and possibly lower prices.

Consumers stand to gain from increased choice, but challenges remain. Google warns that fragmentation might confuse users and weaken security protocols. Industry analysts suggest this could parallel changes in the European Union under the Digital Markets Act, where similar openness is required. Epic’s CEO, Tim Sweeney, hailed the decision as a victory for fair competition, though he acknowledged ongoing fights in other jurisdictions.

Google’s Response and Potential Appeals

Google has vowed to fight on, emphasizing its role in maintaining a safe ecosystem. In a blog post, the company stated that the mandated changes are “dangerous” and could undermine Android’s advantages over iOS. The Verge reported Google’s earlier request for a stay, highlighting concerns over rushed implementation, as seen in The Verge. If the Supreme Court takes up the case, it could prolong the uncertainty.

Meanwhile, Epic is moving swiftly to capitalize. The company announced plans to bring Fortnite back to Android via its store, potentially reigniting its popularity. This shift might pressure Apple, facing its own Epic lawsuit, though outcomes there have been mixed.

Broader Industry Ramifications and Future Outlook

The decision underscores growing scrutiny of Big Tech’s gatekeeping power. Publications like Wikipedia chronicle how Epic’s dual suits against Google and Apple highlight monopolistic tendencies in app distribution. For Android, which powers over 70% of global smartphones, opening up could invite players like Amazon or Microsoft to expand their app ecosystems.

Yet, enforcement will be key. A court-appointed committee will monitor Google’s compliance, ensuring no backdoor restrictions. As the Times of India covered in The Times of India, this ruling might inspire similar challenges worldwide, promoting a more open mobile economy. Industry insiders predict short-term disruptions but long-term benefits, as competition drives better services and innovation for all stakeholders.

Subscribe for Updates

MobileDevPro Newsletter

By signing up for our newsletter you agree to receive content related to ientry.com / webpronews.com and our affiliate partners. For additional information refer to our terms of service.

Notice an error?

Help us improve our content by reporting any issues you find.

Get the WebProNews newsletter delivered to your inbox

Get the free daily newsletter read by decision makers

Subscribe
Advertise with Us

Ready to get started?

Get our media kit

Advertise with Us