For years, the Tor Browser stood alone as the gold standard for privacy-conscious web browsing. Then, in April 2023, Mullvad VPN and the Tor Project launched something different: a browser built on the same anti-fingerprinting foundations as Tor, but designed to work with a VPN instead of the onion network. Now, Mullvad Browser is accelerating its development cadence and broadening its hardware reach in ways that suggest the Swedish privacy company sees a much larger addressable market than niche cypherpunks.
The headline change is straightforward. Mullvad Browser’s alpha testing channel — where experimental builds land before general release — has shifted from irregular updates to a predictable four-week cycle. That alone wouldn’t turn heads. But the simultaneous addition of ARM-based Linux device support signals something more strategic: Mullvad is preparing for a hardware world that’s rapidly moving beyond traditional x86 desktops.
As TechRadar reported, the alpha channel now ships builds for Linux ARM devices alongside the existing Windows, macOS, and Linux x86 platforms. This means Raspberry Pi users, owners of ARM-based Linux laptops, and anyone running distributions on ARM single-board computers can now test the latest Mullvad Browser builds as they arrive. The stable release channel remains unchanged for now — updates there will continue to follow Mozilla’s Extended Support Release (ESR) schedule for Firefox, which is the browser’s upstream codebase.
Why Four Weeks Matters More Than It Sounds
Mozilla releases a new version of Firefox roughly every four weeks. By aligning its alpha channel to the same rhythm, Mullvad Browser can pull in upstream security patches, performance improvements, and web compatibility fixes far more quickly than before. For testers, this eliminates the frustrating lag that previously existed between a Firefox update and its incorporation into Mullvad’s builds.
This is not a trivial engineering commitment. Mullvad Browser isn’t a simple Firefox reskin. It carries extensive modifications inherited from the Tor Browser’s uplift patches — anti-fingerprinting measures that alter how the browser reports screen resolution, installed fonts, timezone data, and dozens of other signals that websites use to uniquely identify visitors. Every time Mozilla pushes a new Firefox version, Mullvad’s developers must rebase those privacy patches, test for regressions, and ensure that the anti-fingerprinting protections haven’t been inadvertently broken by upstream changes.
A four-week alpha cadence means that work now happens on a fixed schedule rather than in bursts. It also means testers get more frequent opportunities to catch bugs before they reach the stable channel. The result should be a more polished product at general release — and a tighter feedback loop between Mullvad’s small development team and its community.
The company confirmed the changes in a post on its official blog, noting that the alpha channel is intended for users comfortable with potential instability. That’s standard caveat language. But the subtext is clear: Mullvad wants more testers, and it’s making the testing experience predictable enough to attract them.
ARM Linux: A Small Market Today, a Bigger One Tomorrow
The ARM Linux addition is where things get interesting from a market perspective. ARM processors have dominated mobile for over a decade, but their incursion into desktop and server computing has accelerated sharply. Apple’s M-series chips proved that ARM could compete with — and often beat — Intel and AMD on performance per watt. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite chips are now shipping in Windows laptops. And in the Linux world, ARM devices range from the $35 Raspberry Pi to powerful workstations from Ampere Computing.
Mullvad’s decision to support ARM Linux in its alpha builds reflects a pragmatic read of where its core audience lives. Privacy-focused users skew heavily toward Linux. And within the Linux community, ARM adoption is growing fast, driven partly by cost (Raspberry Pi clusters are cheap to run) and partly by ideology (ARM devices often offer better support for open firmware and hardware transparency).
There’s also a practical dimension. Raspberry Pi devices are commonly used as home servers, VPN gateways, and network appliances. A privacy-hardened browser that runs natively on these devices — without the overhead of x86 emulation — makes Mullvad Browser a more natural fit for the kind of user who’s already running Pi-hole for ad blocking or WireGuard for VPN tunneling.
The timing aligns with broader industry moves. The Tor Project itself has been expanding ARM support across its tools. And Firefox, the upstream base, has improved its ARM Linux performance significantly over the past two years. Mullvad is essentially riding a wave that Mozilla and the Tor Project have been building.
So what does this mean competitively? Mullvad Browser’s main rivals in the privacy browser space are the Tor Browser itself, Brave, and to a lesser extent LibreWolf (a community-maintained Firefox fork focused on privacy). Brave has had ARM Linux builds for some time. The Tor Browser supports ARM on Android but has been slower to offer ARM Linux desktop builds. By moving early on ARM Linux alpha support, Mullvad positions itself as the go-to option for privacy-focused ARM Linux users who don’t want to route all traffic through Tor’s onion network.
That’s a niche within a niche. But niches compound. And Mullvad’s business model — selling VPN subscriptions at a flat €5 per month with no accounts, no email addresses, and payment accepted in cash or cryptocurrency — depends on building trust with exactly this kind of technically sophisticated, privacy-demanding user. The browser is a funnel. A good one.
It’s also worth watching how this plays into Mullvad’s relationship with the Tor Project. The two organizations collaborated closely on the browser’s initial development, and the Tor Project’s anti-fingerprinting expertise is baked into every build. But Mullvad Browser exists because there’s a segment of users who want Tor-grade fingerprinting protection without Tor’s speed penalties and exit node limitations. That segment appears to be growing, and Mullvad’s investment in faster updates and broader hardware support suggests internal data backs that up.
The Bigger Picture for Privacy Browsers
Privacy browsers remain a small fraction of overall browser market share. Chrome dominates. Safari holds the Apple crowd. Firefox’s share has been declining for years. But within the subset of users who actively choose a browser based on privacy properties — not just a “private browsing” mode that does little more than skip local history — the competition is intensifying.
Brave has grown aggressively, crossing 60 million monthly active users by its own count, though its cryptocurrency integrations and ad-replacement model have drawn criticism from privacy purists. LibreWolf offers a hardened Firefox experience but lacks the organizational backing and anti-fingerprinting depth that Mullvad Browser inherits from the Tor Project. And Tor Browser itself, while unmatched in anonymity, imposes usability costs that many users aren’t willing to accept for everyday browsing.
Mullvad Browser occupies a specific position in this field: maximum anti-fingerprinting with minimum usability friction, assuming you’re willing to pair it with a VPN (ideally Mullvad’s own, though the browser works with any VPN or even without one). The four-week alpha cycle and ARM Linux support are incremental moves, not dramatic pivots. But they’re the kind of incremental moves that compound into a meaningfully better product over time.
And that’s ultimately what separates companies that build lasting trust in the privacy space from those that don’t. Not grand gestures. Consistent execution. Mullvad has been doing this quietly for years — no marketing department, no affiliate programs, no influencer partnerships. Just a VPN service that works, a browser that protects, and now, a development process that’s getting faster and reaching more hardware.
For industry watchers, the signal is less about Mullvad specifically and more about what it reflects: the privacy tools market is maturing. Users expect regular updates, broad platform support, and transparency about development processes. The era of privacy tools maintained by a single developer pushing builds whenever they find time is giving way to something more structured. More professional. And ultimately, more trustworthy.
Whether Mullvad Browser ever breaks out of its niche is almost beside the point. Its existence — and its steady improvement — raises the floor for what privacy-conscious users should expect from any browser. That pressure flows uphill. Mozilla feels it. Google, in its own way, responds to it. The ripple effects of a small Swedish VPN company shipping ARM Linux alpha builds on a four-week cycle reach further than the download numbers alone would suggest.
WebProNews is an iEntry Publication