Microsoft’s BitLocker Backdoor: How FBI Unlocked Encrypted Laptops

Microsoft handed FBI BitLocker keys to unlock encrypted laptops in a Guam fraud case, confirming it complies with about 20 annual legal requests. Experts decry cloud-stored keys as a privacy flaw, contrasting Apple's resistance.
Microsoft’s BitLocker Backdoor: How FBI Unlocked Encrypted Laptops
Written by Mike Johnson

In a revelation shaking the foundations of digital security, Microsoft has confirmed it handed over BitLocker recovery keys to the FBI, granting access to encrypted data on seized laptops. The disclosure, detailed in court documents from a Guam fraud probe, marks the first known instance of the tech giant providing such keys to law enforcement under a valid court order. This development exposes a critical vulnerability in Windows’ default encryption setup, where convenience for users collides with profound privacy risks.

BitLocker, Microsoft’s full-disk encryption tool enabled by default on many modern Windows PCs, scrambles data on hard drives to prevent unauthorized access. Users are prompted to back up recovery keys to their Microsoft account in the cloud, a feature designed for scenarios like forgotten passwords. However, these unencrypted keys stored on Microsoft’s servers become accessible via legal process, bypassing the very protections users expect from encryption. A Microsoft spokesperson, Charles Chamberlayne, told Forbes: “While key recovery offers convenience, it also carries a risk of unwanted access, so Microsoft believes customers are in the best position to decide… how to manage their keys.”

The company receives about 20 such requests annually from authorities like the FBI, though many cannot be fulfilled if keys aren’t cloud-stored. In cases where they are, Microsoft complies, as confirmed in its transparency reports covering periods like July to December 2024, which noted 128 global law enforcement requests, 77 from U.S. agencies, per The Register.

Guam Fraud Case Cracks Open the Vault

The trigger for public scrutiny was an early 2025 investigation in Guam, where the FBI suspected a scheme to siphon funds from the island’s Covid unemployment assistance program. Agents seized three laptops encrypted with BitLocker from suspects, including Charissa Tenorio, who pleaded not guilty. Without the keys, the devices were impenetrable—BitLocker’s algorithms have thwarted prior law enforcement cracking attempts, as noted by an ICE forensic expert in 2025. Microsoft provided the keys after a search warrant, enabling access to evidence referenced in court filings.

Court dockets from the U.S. District Court in Guam, unsealed and reviewed by journalists, confirm the warrant’s execution. Tenorio’s lawyer acknowledged prosecutors’ filings included data from her client’s computer unlocked via Microsoft-supplied BitLocker keys. The case remains ongoing, but it underscores how cloud-escrowed keys turn encryption into a conditional shield, dependent on user choices and corporate compliance.

This incident echoes historical tensions, like a 2013 claim by a Microsoft engineer of rebuffing government backdoor requests, and contrasts with Apple’s 2016 standoff over San Bernardino iPhones, where no keys were surrendered.

Cryptography Experts Sound Alarm

Matthew Green, cryptography professor at Johns Hopkins University, dissected the flaw in a widely viewed X thread: “The problem is that these recovery keys aren’t encrypted end-to-end in a way that Microsoft can’t access. So if law enforcement wants to access your encrypted drive… they can just ask Microsoft for the key. And Microsoft will hand it over.” He warned of broader risks: “If MS can easily produce this data to law enforcement, then anyone who compromises their cloud infrastructure… can potentially access that data.” Green’s post, linking the Forbes article, garnered nearly 3,000 likes and highlighted Microsoft’s outlier status in 2026.

Jennifer Granick, ACLU surveillance counsel, told Forbes: “Remote storage of decryption keys can be quite dangerous… The keys give the government access to everything on the hard drive.” Senator Ron Wyden criticized: “It is simply irresponsible for tech companies to ship products in a way that allows them to secretly turn over users’ encryption keys.” LinkedIn comments on Thomas Brewster’s post echoed user fault: “The suspects kept their keys in the cloud… The suspects are at fault here for poor security,” wrote Todd G. Shipley.

Windows Central described it as a “privacy nightmare,” noting Windows 11’s push for Microsoft accounts automatically backs up keys unless users intervene via account.microsoft.com/devices/recoverykey. Windows Central urged deletion of stored keys.

Cloud Act and Legal Leverage

U.S. laws like the CLOUD Act compel American firms to disclose data worldwide upon valid orders, overriding foreign privacy rules—a point raised in LinkedIn discussions referencing Microsoft’s past Ireland data fight. The Register noted Microsoft’s guidance: “We do not provide any government with our encryption keys or the ability to break our encryption,” yet customer keys are fair game if escrowed.

TechCrunch reported the handover in the Guam case, with Microsoft averaging 20 annual FBI requests, per TechCrunch. Tom’s Hardware confirmed Redmond’s policy: providing keys to agencies with valid orders, as did Inc. and Sportskeeda, amplifying the story across outlets.

X discussions trended, with users like @namazso noting: “You mean if the user explicitly clicks ‘Save to your Microsoft account’,” countering defaults’ role.

Industry Peers Draw a Harder Line

Unlike Microsoft, Apple designs FileVault so iCloud backups encrypt keys server-side, rendering them useless to authorities—neither Apple nor Meta’s WhatsApp has reportedly yielded keys. Google follows suit. Green remarked: “If Apple can do it, if Google can do it, then Microsoft can do it. Microsoft is the only company that’s not doing this… It’s a little weird.”

Windows Central contrasted: Apple refuses access, using zero-knowledge proofs. This positions Microsoft as lagging, especially as Windows 11 enforces online accounts, per Reddit threads on r/technology.

ProPublica and others note Microsoft’s federal ties, including billions in contracts, raising questions on oversight amid security lapses.

Enterprise and User Reckoning

For enterprises, BitLocker’s default cloud escrow suits key management but invites subpoenas—Microsoft’s law enforcement guidelines admit storing customer keys for even large clients to avoid loss. ICE’s failed BitLocker cracks, per Brewster’s reporting, made Microsoft the path of least resistance.

Users can mitigate by printing keys or using USB drives, skipping cloud backup during setup. Tom’s Hardware and WebProNews advise checking and revoking cloud keys. X users quipped: “Not your keys, not your data,” urging alternatives like VeraCrypt.

The fallout ripples: Reddit’s r/privacytoolsIO debates prior subpoenas; Hacker News threads dissect framing. As 2026 unfolds, pressure mounts for Microsoft to adopt end-to-end encryption, balancing recovery with true privacy.

Subscribe for Updates

SecurityProNews Newsletter

News, updates and trends in IT security.

By signing up for our newsletter you agree to receive content related to ientry.com / webpronews.com and our affiliate partners. For additional information refer to our terms of service.

Notice an error?

Help us improve our content by reporting any issues you find.

Get the WebProNews newsletter delivered to your inbox

Get the free daily newsletter read by decision makers

Subscribe
Advertise with Us

Ready to get started?

Get our media kit

Advertise with Us