LinkedIn’s Trust Erosion: AI Bots, Scams, and Urgent Reforms Needed

LinkedIn, once a hub for genuine professional networking, is increasingly plagued by AI bots, fake profiles for scams and espionage, and algorithmic favoritism toward insincere content. This erosion of trust, fueled by corporate practices like phantom job listings, risks rendering the platform obsolete. Urgent reforms are needed to restore authenticity.
LinkedIn’s Trust Erosion: AI Bots, Scams, and Urgent Reforms Needed
Written by Dave Ritchie

In the polished world of professional networking, LinkedIn has long positioned itself as the go-to platform for career advancement, job hunting and corporate connections. But beneath its veneer of resumes and endorsements lies a growing underbelly of artificiality that is undermining its core purpose. A recent article in Prospect Magazine titled “LinkedIn is the Fakest Platform of Them All,” published on August 2, 2025, argues that what was meant to be a hub for genuine professionals has devolved into a playground for chatbots and scripted interactions. The piece highlights how automated bots are flooding feeds with generic comments and connections, turning meaningful exchanges into echo chambers of insincerity.

This infiltration isn’t just annoying—it’s a systemic issue. Users report receiving connection requests from profiles that spout platitudes like “Let’s collaborate on synergies!” only to reveal themselves as AI-driven entities designed to harvest data or promote scams. According to the Prospect piece, LinkedIn’s algorithms prioritize engagement over authenticity, rewarding viral posts that mimic inspirational TED Talks but lack substance, much like the performative positivity critiqued in a 2020 InsideHook analysis of the platform’s shift toward faux-inspirational content.

The Rise of Automated Deception and Its Impact on Trust

The problem extends beyond mere bots to sophisticated fake profiles used for espionage. Intelligence agencies have sounded alarms: In 2021, the BBC reported that MI5 warned of thousands of UK workers being approached by spies via fabricated LinkedIn accounts. These profiles, often featuring AI-generated photos and plagiarized bios, aim to extract sensitive information from unsuspecting professionals in sectors like defense and tech.

More recently, a 2023 WIRED investigation revealed how state actors from Russia, North Korea, Iran and China exploit LinkedIn’s lax verification to create networks of deceit. The platform’s tools for detecting fakes, such as photo matching and activity monitoring, fall short against evolving AI tactics, leaving corporate HR departments scrambling to vet connections. As one cybersecurity expert noted in the WIRED piece, “LinkedIn is a goldmine for intelligence gathering because people treat it as a resume repository.”

Corporate Complicity and the Illusion of Opportunity

Compounding the fakery are the platform’s own practices. Posts on X (formerly Twitter) from users like data analysts and recruiters echo sentiments that LinkedIn hosts a slew of phantom job listings. A 2024 X thread cited by multiple users alleged that companies post fake openings to inflate metrics for investors, a claim supported by a WebProNews report from August 17, 2025, which critiqued the site’s “toxic positivity” culture fostering burnout through performative posts.

This manufactured optimism masks deeper issues, such as the proliferation of unqualified influencers peddling advice. The Prospect article points out how LinkedIn’s feed algorithms amplify viral, chatbot-generated content, sidelining authentic voices. Industry insiders, including those in a 2022 Tech Monitor piece, warn that without robust reforms—like mandatory identity verification or AI detection mandates—the platform risks becoming obsolete for real networking.

Toward a More Authentic Future Amid Growing Scrutiny

Efforts to combat this are underway, but uneven. LinkedIn has rolled out features like “verified” badges, yet critics argue they’re insufficient against the tide of deepfakes. A 2025 The Drum opinion piece emphasized that users aren’t the true customers—advertisers and data buyers are—explaining the tolerance for inauthenticity. For professionals, the advice is clear: scrutinize connections, report suspicious activity and perhaps diversify to emerging platforms less prone to bot infestations.

As LinkedIn approaches its 22nd year, the irony is stark: a site built on trust is eroding it through unchecked fakery. Industry leaders must push for transparency, or risk a mass exodus similar to the one pondered for X in a 2024 Prospect article on abandoning toxic social media. Without change, LinkedIn’s promise of professional authenticity may remain just another illusion in the digital age.

Subscribe for Updates

SocialMediaNews Newsletter

News and insights for social media leaders, marketers and decision makers.

By signing up for our newsletter you agree to receive content related to ientry.com / webpronews.com and our affiliate partners. For additional information refer to our terms of service.

Notice an error?

Help us improve our content by reporting any issues you find.

Get the WebProNews newsletter delivered to your inbox

Get the free daily newsletter read by decision makers

Subscribe
Advertise with Us

Ready to get started?

Get our media kit

Advertise with Us