Fitbit’s 2025 Sleep Update Draws Backlash for Lower Scores

Fitbit's 2025 sleep tracking update, designed for greater accuracy by aligning with clinical standards, has faced backlash as users report reduced sleep scores and times, feeling it overcorrects by logging more wakefulness. Competitors like Apple and Garmin offer consistent alternatives, pressuring Fitbit to address feedback and restore user trust.
Fitbit’s 2025 Sleep Update Draws Backlash for Lower Scores
Written by Jill Joy

In the ever-evolving world of wearable technology, Fitbit’s latest sleep tracking update has sparked a heated debate among users and experts alike. Announced in early August 2025, the update promised enhanced accuracy in monitoring sleep stages, duration, and quality, leveraging refined algorithms to better distinguish between restful sleep and periods of wakefulness. However, what was intended as a step forward has instead drawn widespread criticism, with many users reporting that their tracked sleep times have inexplicably decreased, painting a picture of poorer rest than before.

Fitbit, now under Google’s umbrella, explained the changes as part of a broader effort to align its metrics more closely with clinical standards. According to details shared on the company’s support forums, the update adjusts how the device interprets movement and heart rate data during the night, potentially classifying more time as “awake” to reflect real-world restlessness. This comes on the heels of previous enhancements, such as the March 2025 rollout of a bedtime suggestion feature, which used historical data to recommend optimal sleep schedules.

Unpacking the Algorithmic Shifts and User Backlash
Yet, the reception has been far from positive. A recent article from Android Authority highlights complaints flooding social media and Reddit, where Fitbit owners describe the update as a downgrade. One user noted their average sleep score dropping by 10 points overnight, attributing it to the app now logging brief awakenings—previously overlooked—as extended wakeful periods. This sentiment echoes across platforms like X, where posts from frustrated users lament the sudden “inaccuracy,” with some speculating that the changes prioritize data precision over user-friendly insights.

Industry insiders point out that such updates are not uncommon in the wearables sector, where companies like Fitbit must balance innovation with reliability. The update builds on earlier 2024 improvements, including a redesigned sleep interface for deeper insights into trends over weeks or months, as reported by Gadgets & Wearables. However, the 2025 iteration seems to have overcorrected, leading to metrics that feel punitive rather than helpful.

Comparative Analysis with Competitors and Broader Implications
Comparisons to rivals underscore the stakes. Garmin and Apple Watch have long offered robust sleep tracking with features like REM detection and recovery scores, often praised for consistency. A TechRadar piece from July 2025 suggests Apple is poised to enhance its own sleep features via AI, potentially without new hardware—a move that could pressure Fitbit further. Meanwhile, X users have shared anecdotes of switching to alternatives like Xiaomi’s Redmi Watch 5, which boasts improved heart rate and sleep accuracy as per recent promotional posts.

For Fitbit, with over 120 million users globally as noted in a 2025 statistics roundup from ElectroiQ, retaining trust is crucial. The company’s response has been measured: a blog post acknowledges the feedback and hints at forthcoming tweaks, but no timeline was provided.

Potential Paths Forward and Expert Perspectives
Experts argue this episode reveals deeper challenges in quantifying sleep, a notoriously subjective metric. Sleep scientists consulted by 9to5Google explain that while the update may indeed be more “accurate” by scientific measures, it disrupts the motivational aspect that draws users to wearables—seeing progress in their habits. One analyst suggests integrating user feedback loops, allowing customization of sensitivity levels, could mitigate backlash.

As the dust settles, Fitbit’s update serves as a case study in the pitfalls of iterative tech improvements. Users on X continue to voice demands for reversions, with viral threads amassing thousands of views. If unaddressed, this could erode loyalty in a market where precision and perception must align. For now, Fitbit advises manual logging for discrepancies, but the broader lesson is clear: in pursuit of better data, companies risk alienating the very people they aim to help sleep soundly.

Subscribe for Updates

HealthRevolution Newsletter

By signing up for our newsletter you agree to receive content related to ientry.com / webpronews.com and our affiliate partners. For additional information refer to our terms of service.

Notice an error?

Help us improve our content by reporting any issues you find.

Get the WebProNews newsletter delivered to your inbox

Get the free daily newsletter read by decision makers

Subscribe
Advertise with Us

Ready to get started?

Get our media kit

Advertise with Us