Cards Against Humanity Settles Trespass Lawsuit with SpaceX

Cards Against Humanity has settled its trespass lawsuit against SpaceX, filed a year ago over unauthorized use of land in Texas bought to protest Trump's border wall. The confidential agreement includes financial terms and SpaceX vacating the site, highlighting tensions between activism and aerospace expansion.
Cards Against Humanity Settles Trespass Lawsuit with SpaceX
Written by Emma Rogers

In a surprising turn of events that underscores the tensions between innovative tech ventures and unconventional corporate activists, Cards Against Humanity, the Chicago-based company behind the irreverent card game, has reached a settlement in its high-profile trespass lawsuit against Elon Musk’s SpaceX. The agreement, announced on Monday, comes exactly one year after the lawsuit was filed, marking a swift resolution to a dispute that captured widespread attention for its blend of corporate mischief and serious property rights claims. Details of the settlement remain confidential, but sources close to the matter indicate it involves undisclosed financial terms and commitments from SpaceX to vacate the disputed land.

The lawsuit originated from Cards Against Humanity’s 2017 purchase of a plot in Cameron County, Texas, near the U.S.-Mexico border. The company acquired the land through a crowdfunding campaign aimed at thwarting then-President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall, raising funds from thousands of supporters under the banner of a satirical protest. SpaceX, which operates its Starbase facility nearby, allegedly began using the vacant parcel without permission, storing equipment, gravel, and other materials there for over six months—potentially longer, according to satellite imagery analyzed by independent investigators.

The Origins of the Dispute

Court filings detailed accusations of trespassing and property damage, with Cards Against Humanity seeking $15 million in compensation. The suit painted a picture of SpaceX’s operations encroaching on the pristine land, transforming it into what the plaintiffs described as a dumping ground for “space garbage.” As reported in a September 2024 article by The Texas Tribune, the card game maker emphasized that its land was intended to remain undeveloped as a symbolic stand against border fortifications, only to be disrupted by Musk’s aerospace ambitions.

Industry observers note that this case highlights broader challenges in South Texas, where SpaceX’s rapid expansion for Starship rocket development has clashed with local landowners and environmental concerns. Satellite evidence from Bellingcat, published just days before the settlement, suggested unauthorized activity on the site dating back more than a year, adding weight to the claims and potentially pressuring SpaceX toward negotiation.

Implications for SpaceX’s Operations

The settlement avoids a protracted court battle that could have exposed internal SpaceX practices, including land acquisition strategies in a region critical to its Mars colonization goals. Insiders familiar with aerospace regulations point out that while SpaceX has secured vast tracts through purchases and eminent domain-like processes, this incident reveals vulnerabilities in informal land use amid aggressive timelines. A Reddit thread on r/spacex, as captured in a post from September 2024, reflected fan discussions debating the merits of the suit, with some viewing it as a publicity stunt by Cards Against Humanity.

For Cards Against Humanity, the resolution aligns with its brand of provocative activism. The company, which has a history of stunts like digging a “Holiday Hole” to nowhere, framed the lawsuit as a defense against “racist billionaires”—a jab at both Trump and Musk. According to coverage in The Washington Post, the suit even humorously offered to accept Twitter (now X) as compensation, though that was likely rhetorical.

Broader Industry Ramifications

This episode raises questions about corporate accountability in high-stakes tech hubs. SpaceX’s settlement, detailed in the latest report from TechCrunch, may set precedents for how companies navigate property disputes in innovation-driven areas. Analysts suggest it could encourage more vigilant land monitoring by activists, potentially slowing expansions in sensitive regions. Meanwhile, Musk’s firm continues undeterred, with recent Starship tests underscoring its pivotal role in NASA’s Artemis program.

As both entities move forward, the case serves as a reminder of the unpredictable intersections between entertainment, activism, and space exploration. Cards Against Humanity plans to restore the land, while SpaceX eyes further growth—ensuring that South Texas remains a hotbed for such unconventional conflicts.

Subscribe for Updates

SpaceRevolution Newsletter

By signing up for our newsletter you agree to receive content related to ientry.com / webpronews.com and our affiliate partners. For additional information refer to our terms of service.

Notice an error?

Help us improve our content by reporting any issues you find.

Get the WebProNews newsletter delivered to your inbox

Get the free daily newsletter read by decision makers

Subscribe
Advertise with Us

Ready to get started?

Get our media kit

Advertise with Us