Apple just blinked in Brazil. On June 18, 2026, the company updated its developer terms and announced sweeping changes to iOS that let Brazilian users download apps from third-party marketplaces and pay for digital goods without routing through Apple’s own system. The move ends a years-long antitrust fight with the country’s competition authority. It also marks the first time such EU-inspired openings have landed in a major market outside Europe.
The trigger was an agreement with CADE, Brazil’s Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica. The settlement, reached late last year after a complaint from MercadoLibre, required Apple to loosen its grip on app distribution and payments. Apple’s own announcement confirms the shift begins with iOS 26.5. Developers can now distribute apps on alternative marketplaces, operate those marketplaces themselves, and process payments for digital goods and services outside Apple In-App Purchase.
But Apple didn’t simply copy its European playbook. The company fought to keep several safeguards in place. Marketplace operators must obtain authorization from Apple and meet ongoing compliance rules. Every app distributed outside the official store has to pass a notarization process. That review mixes automated scans with human checks aimed at catching malware and known security threats. Apple stressed these steps address new risks of fraud, scams, and privacy issues that come with looser controls.
Child safety received particular attention. Apps in the Kids category cannot use external payment links. Alternative payment systems must include parental gates for users under 18. Younger users also cannot access web-based payment flows from apps downloaded through the App Store. Apple is building APIs so parents can monitor and approve purchases made outside its system. These protections, the company argued, go further than what European rules permitted.
The financial terms show Apple’s determination to capture revenue even as it yields ground. Developers selling digital goods through the Brazilian App Store face commissions of 10% or 21%, depending on their size and program eligibility. Those who stick with Apple’s In-App Purchase add a 5% payment processing fee on top. Links that steer users to external websites for purchases trigger a 15% Store Services Commission, dropping to 10% for some smaller developers. Apps obtained through alternative marketplaces pay a 5% Core Technology Commission on qualifying sales.
Apple insists most developers will pay the same or less than before. The structure echoes adjustments made in Europe after the Digital Markets Act took hold, yet Brazil’s version keeps Apple’s payment option visible alongside rivals. The company requires alternative payment choices to appear next to its own so users can tell who processes the transaction. Those who choose Apple’s system keep familiar tools for subscriptions, refunds, payment history, and fraud reports. Buyers using third-party options lose that support and may share card details with more companies. Apple warned it will have reduced ability to help with scams or disputes in those cases.
The changes arrived faster than many expected. Developers must accept the updated Apple Developer Program License Agreement by July 6, 2026. A new “App Installation” setting already appeared in iOS 26.5 betas, letting Brazilian users choose default marketplaces. The framework builds on technology Apple created for Europe, including MarketplaceKit for alternative distribution. Yet Brazilian rules emphasize authorized marketplaces over pure sideloading, a distinction Apple highlighted as superior for security.
This isn’t isolated. Japan’s Mobile Software Competition Act produced similar accommodations. The European Commission, by contrast, has clashed repeatedly with Apple over DMA compliance, fining the company and criticizing its implementation of choice screens and fees. In the United States, the Epic Games case opened external payment links but stopped short of mandating alternative app stores nationwide. Brazil’s outcome sits somewhere in the middle: more open than pre-Epic America, more protective than the EU.
CADE’s investigation began in 2022 after MercadoLibre accused Apple of blocking competition through mandatory use of its payment system and restrictions on steering. Interim measures and appeals dragged on. The final settlement, approved in December 2025, gave Apple 105 days to comply in some earlier versions of the deal. The regulator accepted Apple’s proposals for notarization, marketplace authorization, and child protections as adequate responses to the competitive concerns.
Industry watchers see broader implications. TechCrunch reported the move loosens Apple’s rules in another significant market and follows parallel revisions in the EU and Japan. It also updates the license agreement to reflect the 5% Core Technology Commission that replaced an earlier per-install fee structure in January 2026. For developers, the question is whether alternative stores gain real traction. Early EU experience showed limited uptake, partly because Apple’s security warnings and the hassle of switching reduced appeal. Brazil could prove different. Its large population of mobile gamers and fast-growing digital economy might encourage local players to build competing storefronts.
Security remains the flashpoint. Apple pointed to pornography apps and increased malware reports that followed similar openings in Europe and Japan. The company’s notarization and authorization requirements aim to filter threats before they reach users. Yet critics argue any crack in the walled garden inevitably raises risks. Parents, in particular, must now navigate more choices and rely on new parental-gate technologies that Apple is still refining.
Payment fragmentation adds another layer. Brazilian banks and payment processors stand to gain from easier access. Users, however, face a more complicated experience. They must decide who handles their transactions, track multiple accounts, and accept less Apple-backed recourse when problems arise. The company made clear that its fraud tools and refund processes work best inside its own system.
The Brazil agreement also reflects a global pattern. Regulators from Brussels to Brasília increasingly view app store policies as antitrust issues. They target anti-steering provisions, mandatory payment systems, and barriers to alternative distribution. Apple has responded by tailoring solutions market by market rather than adopting a single global standard. The result is a patchwork that raises compliance costs but lets the company preserve more control than a uniform DMA-style regime would allow.
CADE itself described the settlement as balancing competition with legitimate security and privacy interests. The regulator avoided imposing pure sideloading or stripping away all parental controls. That pragmatic approach may influence other emerging markets considering their own digital rules. It also gives Apple arguments to use in ongoing fights with the European Commission, where officials have questioned the complexity and effectiveness of the company’s compliance measures.
For app makers the immediate task is technical. They must update code to support new entitlements, implement alternative payment flows, and decide whether to pursue distribution through third-party stores. Many will test the waters cautiously. The reduced commissions could improve margins on high-volume digital sales. Yet the added complexity of supporting multiple payment providers and the potential for user confusion may offset some gains.
Longer term, the changes test whether forced openness actually delivers more competition or simply shifts power to new gatekeepers. Alternative marketplace operators in Brazil will need to attract both developers and users while meeting Apple’s authorization standards. If they succeed, they could pressure Apple on fees and features. If adoption stays low, the episode may reinforce the company’s view that most users prefer the convenience and safety of its curated store.
Either way, the dam has broken in another large economy. AppleInsider noted that Brazil becomes the first major non-European market to receive this full set of marketplace and payment options. The underlying technology came from DMA compliance efforts, but the final package reflects negotiations that let Apple retain tools it considers essential for trust and safety. Regulators got their opening. Apple kept its warnings, its notarization gate, and a revenue stream that, while smaller, still flows.
The rest of the world will watch closely. Developers in Latin America now have new options on iOS. Brazilian consumers face more choices and, Apple warns, more risks. Competition authorities elsewhere may draw lessons on what mix of openness and oversight works. And Apple, once again, finds itself rewriting its rulebook under regulatory pressure, one country at a time.
WebProNews is an iEntry Publication