Apple is preparing to hand users direct control over the artificial intelligence that powers core features on their iPhones, iPads and Macs. The change, set for this fall’s software updates, marks a sharp departure from the company’s initial approach to generative AI. No longer will OpenAI’s ChatGPT stand as the sole outside option. Instead, device owners will pick from a menu of models.
According to a detailed report from Bloomberg, the feature carries an internal label: Extensions. It lets users route requests for text generation, image creation and editing through AI services tied to apps installed from the App Store. A message shown in test versions of the software puts it plainly. “Extensions allow you to access generative AI capabilities from installed apps on demand, through Apple Intelligence features such as Siri, Writing Tools, Image Playground and more.”
But why now? Apple Intelligence launched with fanfare in 2024 yet quickly revealed limits. Its on-device models handled basic tasks with strong privacy protections. More demanding work defaulted to ChatGPT. That single partnership drew praise for speed to market. It also invited criticism that Apple had ceded too much ground to one rival. Mark Gurman’s reporting at Bloomberg shows the company now wants flexibility. Google’s Gemini and Anthropic’s Claude have already entered internal testing.
The mechanics appear straightforward. Users visit Settings, select a preferred model from available Extensions, and the system routes compatible queries accordingly. AI companies must build support into their existing App Store apps to participate. No new downloads required beyond the chatbot or productivity app itself. This design keeps Apple in control of the interface and data routing while outsourcing the heavy computation.
Privacy remains a stated priority. On-device processing stays central where possible. When cloud resources engage, Apple’s Private Cloud Compute framework continues to shield user data. Still, routing through third-party models introduces new variables. Each provider brings its own policies on training data, retention and security. Users gain choice. They also shoulder new decisions about which company holds their prompts.
Industry watchers see broader implications. TechCrunch described the move as turning iOS 27 into a “choose your own adventure” for AI. The report noted that models from Google and Anthropic are under active evaluation. Reuters echoed the details, confirming the rollout targets iOS 27, iPadOS 27 and macOS 27. Reuters highlighted how the change ends ChatGPT’s exclusive position for certain tasks.
Developers stand to benefit too. Earlier moves at WWDC 2025 opened Apple’s on-device foundation models to app makers through the Foundation Models framework. That allowed offline AI features without per-request cloud costs. Extensions take the concept further. Third-party AI providers can now plug directly into Siri, writing aids and image tools. An app built around Claude could become the default brain for an entire device.
Competition in the AI sector has intensified since Apple Intelligence first appeared. OpenAI pushed rapid updates to ChatGPT. Google integrated Gemini across Android and its own services. Anthropic positioned Claude as the thoughtful, enterprise-friendly alternative. Apple’s response evolved from building everything internally to selective partnerships and now to this open marketplace approach.
Analysts point to hardware advantages. Newer iPhones and Macs carry powerful neural processing units. These chips run smaller models efficiently. Larger, more capable models still need cloud support. Extensions let Apple avoid the expense of training ever-larger proprietary systems while still claiming the best available technology. The company retains the operating system layer. It decides which models qualify and how they surface in the user interface.
Yet risks exist. Model quality varies. One provider might excel at creative writing. Another could deliver superior coding suggestions or image generation. Users might switch frequently, creating inconsistency. Enterprise IT departments could face headaches standardizing behavior across fleets of devices. And the specter of regulatory scrutiny looms. Antitrust authorities already examine Apple’s App Store policies. A new AI Extensions section might draw fresh attention.
Recent coverage reinforces the momentum. The Verge reported that the feature could create what amounts to an AI App Store, complete with dedicated discovery. Quartz noted the testing with Google and Anthropic and the potential end to OpenAI exclusivity. Quartz framed the decision as Apple opening its AI software to rivals in a bid to broaden appeal.
Conversations on X captured immediate reactions. One post described the shift as Apple admitting it cannot own the entire stack. Another called it an “AI App Store” play that keeps platform control while outsourcing intelligence. Enthusiasts highlighted the billion-device opportunity. The model that wins default status on iOS could see enormous usage.
This isn’t Apple’s first pivot on AI. Initial plans for a more advanced Siri slipped from 2025 into 2026. A partnership with Google for Gemini technology emerged earlier this year to accelerate progress. Now the company appears ready to let users decide whose model powers their daily experience. The strategy echoes Apple’s historical pattern. Control the platform. Invite capable partners. Maintain the final say on user experience.
Executives have long emphasized privacy as a differentiator. On-device models and Private Cloud Compute were designed to keep data from leaving the device unnecessarily. Third-party Extensions will test how well that promise holds when Claude or Gemini handle the actual generation. Apple will likely require agreements that mirror its own standards. Whether providers accept those terms remains to be seen.
The timing feels deliberate. iOS 27 arrives amid growing user frustration with current AI assistants. Many want more personalization, better context awareness and fewer refusals. By offering multiple models, Apple lets the market sort the winners. Users who prefer concise answers might pick one option. Those seeking creative output could choose another. The operating system becomes a neutral stage.
Of course, implementation details will matter. How clearly does the Settings menu explain model differences? Can users assign different models to different tasks? Siri for scheduling, Claude for writing, Gemini for research? The Bloomberg report leaves some questions open. Future updates or WWDC sessions may fill gaps.
What seems certain is the directional change. Apple spent years building its own AI foundation. It partnered selectively. Now it prepares to democratize access within its walled garden. The company that once dictated every aspect of the iPhone experience now invites rivals to power its smartest features. That shift could reshape competition not just in mobile AI but across the technology industry.
Developers already experimenting with Apple’s frameworks may accelerate their work. App makers could build specialized tools that shine when paired with a particular model. The result might be richer experiences than any single company could deliver alone. It also raises the stakes for AI labs. Performance, speed, cost and safety will face direct, user-driven comparison on the world’s most valuable computing platform.
Apple has not commented publicly on the Bloomberg findings. The company typically remains silent on unreleased software. Yet the pattern of leaks and test builds suggests the feature has advanced beyond early speculation. When iOS 27 betas arrive this summer, developers and enthusiasts will hunt for the Extensions toggle.
For an industry long accustomed to Apple’s closed approach, the move signals maturity. The firm recognizes that no single model will dominate every use case. Better to orchestrate choice than force a compromise. Users gain flexibility. Partners gain distribution. Apple keeps the platform, the data routing and the customer relationship.
The coming months will test whether this hybrid strategy delivers. If Extensions work smoothly, they could quiet criticism that Apple lagged in AI. If integration proves clunky or privacy concerns mount, the backlash could intensify. For now, the direction is set. Choice is coming to Apple Intelligence. And the choices users make could determine which AI companies thrive in the years ahead.
WebProNews is an iEntry Publication