In a stark reminder of the perils facing luxury retail amid shifting consumer habits and mounting debt, Amazon.com Inc. has escalated its battle against Saks Global Enterprises LLC’s Chapter 11 filing, labeling its $475 million investment ‘presumptively worthless’ and threatening ‘drastic remedies’ if its concerns go unaddressed. The e-commerce titan filed objections in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Houston, accusing Saks of burning through cash at an alarming rate after the $2.7 billion acquisition of Neiman Marcus Group in December 2024.

The investment was meant to secure Saks products on Amazon’s platform via a ‘Saks at Amazon’ storefront, complete with guaranteed referral fees totaling at least $900 million over eight years, alongside Amazon’s technology and logistics support. Yet, mere months later, Saks’ rapid cash depletion and unpaid invoices have left Amazon’s stake in jeopardy, pushing the company lower in the creditor hierarchy under the proposed $1.75 billion debtor-in-possession financing plan.

During a marathon hearing on January 15, 2026, before Judge Alfredo Perez, Saks secured interim approval to access about $400 million of that financing, staving off immediate liquidation. Amazon’s legal team argued the plan saddles previously unencumbered Saks entities with new debt, harming creditors like itself. Judge Perez has yet to rule on the full financing or Amazon’s broader objections. CNBC first detailed the filing’s explosive language.

Saks’ Swift Descent Post-Merger

Saks Global, encompassing Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus, and Bergdorf Goodman, filed for bankruptcy on January 14, 2026, after missing a $100 million debt payment that triggered cross-defaults across its obligations. The filing reveals a company saddled with over $1 billion in secured debt and hundreds of millions in trade claims, despite the high-profile merger aimed at creating a luxury retail powerhouse.

Amazon’s court papers paint a picture of mismanagement: ‘Saks continuously failed to meet its budgets, burned through hundreds of millions of dollars in less than a year, and ran up additional hundreds of millions of dollars in unpaid invoices owed to its retail partners.’ This echoes broader struggles in department store retail, where Saks’ assets include prime real estate like its Fifth Avenue flagship, but liabilities dwarf them amid declining foot traffic and e-commerce competition.

The merger brought in tech heavyweights like Amazon and Salesforce, which took a smaller minority stake. While Salesforce’s position remains unclear, Amazon’s aggressive stance signals potential friction among investors. Yahoo Finance reported on Amazon’s initial loss in blocking interim funding after a 7.5-hour court skirmish.

Strategic Partnership Gone Awry

The Amazon-Saks pact was part of Amazon’s push into luxury e-commerce, featuring curated fashion and beauty items on its site with Saks paying referral fees. Amazon has pursued similar deals, such as its expanding stake in Grubhub from 2% in 2022 to up to 18% in 2024, tying investments to Prime perks. For Saks, Amazon’s involvement promised logistics prowess to compete with pure-play online rivals.

Yet, bankruptcy documents show Saks projected $900 million in annual sales from Amazon collaborations that never materialized at scale, contributing to liquidity woes. Amazon now warns that the financing plan’s structure—prioritizing new lenders—dilutes recovery for equity holders like itself, prompting threats of seeking an examiner or trustee to oversee proceedings.

Posts on X from industry observers highlight sentiment around Amazon’s uncharacteristic retail misstep, with users noting the irony of the tech giant’s physical retail ambitions—from scrapped bookstore experiments to Whole Foods integration—now clashing with Saks’ woes. No official statements from Amazon or Saks beyond filings, per reports.

Courtroom Drama Unfolds

Judge Perez’s interim ruling allows Saks to draw $400 million immediately, with final approval pending in coming weeks. Amazon and other objecting creditors can renew challenges. Bloomberg noted the judge overruled Amazon’s bid despite claims of breached agreements, buying Saks time amid vendor lawsuits over unpaid bills. Bloomberg.

Saks’ filing lists assets of $1.5 billion to $10 billion against similar liabilities, with key creditors including Apollo Global Management and a steering committee of lenders. The plan envisions shedding $1.5 billion in debt through restructuring, but Amazon argues it favors senior lenders unfairly. Reuters detailed the creditor roster and financing terms. Reuters.

For Amazon, the stakes extend beyond $475 million; failure here could deter future retail investments as it eyes fashion dominance. Business of Fashion reported Saks’ relief at securing rescue funds despite objections. Business of Fashion.

Implications for Luxury Retail and Tech Investors

This saga underscores luxury retail’s fragility: post-merger synergies faltered as Saks faced $500 million-plus in annual cash burn, per filings. Fox Business highlighted the bankruptcy trigger from the missed payment. Fox Business. Neiman Marcus itself had restructured in 2020, yet the combined entity couldn’t weather e-commerce pressures and economic headwinds.

Amazon’s threat of ‘drastic action’—potentially converting debt, litigating breaches, or pushing for liquidation—could prolong proceedings, benefiting no one. TheStreet covered vendor suits preceding the filing. TheStreet. Business Insider quoted Amazon’s stark warning of pursuing remedies if unresolved. Business Insider.

As hearings continue, eyes are on whether Amazon leverages its influence to reshape the plan or exits the luxury fray wiser. FashionUnited noted the court’s approval despite pushback. FashionUnited. The outcome will test bankruptcy norms when tech meets troubled retail.