Quantcast

Windows 8 Promises Faster Boot Up Times

Windows booting up faster? Yes, please.

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:
Windows 8 Promises Faster Boot Up Times
[ Technology]

People often test how robust their computer is by seeing how long it takes to boot it up from an off postion. Now, it’s true the software being booted into has a huge impact on upload speeds, so that needs to be taken into account as well. In fact, you could have a quad core Intel with 10 gigs of RAM, and if your operating system is bloated, via either user negligence or poor design, the boot process could take much longer than such a machine should allow.

It’s this OS bloat that Microsoft is looking to avoid with its upcoming Windows 8 operating system. In fact, the latest post at the Building Windows 8 blog has to do with improving the overall boot up speed as we transition from Windows 7 to the 8 environment. Using the boot process to measure your computer’s power is a concept understood by Microsoft as well:

This is understandable—boot times represent an effective proxy for overall system performance and we all know the boot experience is an incredibly important thing for us to get right for customers.

Because of that, improving the boot speed was one of Microsoft’s primary goals with Windows 8. In fact, Windows acknowledged three major points in relation to booting up in with future Windows 8 boxes:

  • Effectively zero watt power draw when off
  • A fresh session after boot
  • Very fast times between pressing the power button and being able to use the PC.
  • In order to do improve the boot times, the Windows 8 developers developed a slick little option that should improve these boot up times in a noticeable manner:

    Now here’s the key difference for Windows 8: as in Windows 7, we close the user sessions, but instead of closing the kernel session, we hibernate it. Compared to a full hibernate, which includes a lot of memory pages in use by apps, session 0 hibernation data is much smaller, which takes substantially less time to write to disk… Using this technique with boot gives us a significant advantage for boot times, since reading the hiberfile in and reinitializing drivers is much faster on most systems (30-70% faster on most systems we’ve tested).

    To quantify their findings, the entry also included a measurement chart that shows the difference in boot speeds with regards to Windows 7 and 8. The chart leads this post, and as you can see, in each condition these tests were performed under, Windows 8 outdid its predecessor, and the new hibernation system is largely credited with the speed improvements:

    It’s faster because resuming the hibernated system session is comparatively less work than doing a full system initialization, but it’s also faster because we added a new multi-phase resume capability, which is able to use all of the cores in a multi-core system in parallel, to split the work of reading from the hiberfile and decompressing the contents.

    Microsoft has also embedded a video showing these new boot times in action. It’s awfully impressive:


    Granted, once you start installing various third-party software suites, and therefore, changing the machine’s registry, boot times will be affected. Most cases, the affect will be a slow down, but in this case, the slower boot up process has nothing to do with Microsoft’s Windows 8 setup. Instead, this becomes a user issue, and if uninstalling it doesn’t correct it, you may want to consider a reinstall, which puts the computer back in its original, fast-boot up state.

    Windows 8 Promises Faster Boot Up Times
    Top Rated White Papers and Resources
    • http://www.TheOkayNetwork.com Steven

      I just want to know how much the OS is going to cost.

      • KittenKoder

        More than it’s worth.

    • http://www.blogdeculturismo.com/ culturismo

      Great idea! Too bad it’s not in a real world setting, and there aren’t a ton of security patches and service packs installed over top of it.

      I remember how XP was going to boot sooooo much faster than ME. Then Vista was supposed to be blazingly fast compared to XP. Then Vista…. well we won’t even go there. Next was 7′s speed increase over Vista. After 8 there will be 9 that will be touted as speedy compared to 8.

    • http://www.westnet.net.au/~gordon451/ Gordon Edwards

      culturismo says: Too bad it’s not in a real world setting…

      Real world setting: Intel D845GEBV 2.4GHz 1GB RAM, W2K SP4 Rollup 1, Lotus SmartSuite r9.5, Avast! v5.1.889, Intel Active Monitor v1.2.2, NetLimiter 2.0.10.1, eDexter 1.34, Cache Sentry v1.6.0.164 plus various system services — Cold start to logged in ready to perform: 83 seconds.

      W8 won’t fit on my box, but I would certainly expect less than 90 seconds on a compatible box (2.5GHz Dual Core, 1 – 2 GB), 70 would be much closer. There’s no way you can spruik low start-ups without user software installed.