Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Why SEO Disgusts Me

It's getting ugly

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 468 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. Holy Sensational title. I don’t really care about the SEOs. The can whatever they want.

    Its the spam filters that are starting to get to me. I’ve been systematically banned from over half the places I comment on. And these are for the most part supportive and insightful comments.

    Automates and shared spam blacklist networks have got to go.

  2. Spot on Mark!

    The thing I hate the most is the “I’ll put you into the top 10 on Google” statement. The only time this can genuinely be promised is when an SEO or site already has that top 10 position.

    On the subject of White, Gray and Black areas. There should be no gray areas withn the ethics of SEO. I agree with Kathy. There is no need to drop to those levels of employing people to write psosts designed to lead people to information which A: doesn’t exist or B: Provides something different to what the browser expected.

    SEO HAS become an ugly game. and it’s not just the link seekers using those “gray” (in other words – unethical) practices. It’s also the business owner whi is affected by false promises of top 10 results etc. There are numerous ways to gain top 10 results usng accepted practices.In some instances you can be found in the top 10 overnight if you research your stuff properly and establish where to submit and how you submit your site and information.

    $200 000 a month on SEO? That’s riduculous. I could probably do the same job for ten. Someone is being screwed.

    It won’t be long before the Googles and Bings and Yahoo’s develop algo’s to weed out the riff raff. When that happens (whether it’s a through a ‘report a link’ process or other process), those that are egaging inunethical SEO practice are going to find themselves out of search results. It’s gong to be difficult to retrack the damage and make it right again.

    I wonder if SEO’s are telling their clients this.

    • Craig: “The thing I hate the most is the “I’ll put you into the top 10 on Google” statement. The only time this can genuinely be promised is when an SEO or site already has that top 10 position.”

      Not true – what most SEO’s don’t tell is that the volume (people searching for that keyword-combination) will be negligible.
      E.g. including the company-name in the search (that will only be helpful if they know your name already) or they stuff your pages with unique keyword combinations first: ‘extra-elegant resort in Gauteng’.

      Used-car salesmen turned to the web – but the business owners can only blame themselves for not researching this…

      It’s a cat-and-mouse game: no matter what the algo’s come up with, it will be exploited. And result in another Panda-update – hurting legitimate businesses in the process.

  3. Slightly hypocritical…and MARK, if you don’t like SEO you would not have comments enabled on your post.

    • Hahaha – Danny, I found your comment hilarious. It’s a good point in more than just your comment.

      • Jonathan Howard

        Danny, were you paid to submit your site to a crappy “submit to 100 search engines” website? No. Did you hire someone to do it for you and train them? No. Your comment makes no sense about this topic. Don’t look now, but having made that off-topic comment on this article, you increased the author’s SEO. Next time you post, remember, bad publicity is good publicity.

        If people stopped commenting on articles they don’t understand, I think the internet would be a much better place.

        • Falcon

          His comment made perfect sense, it is you that has taken offense to such comments.

          “Your” comment above makes no sense as you are referring to a comment above that you have purposely removed from the original post that he made. Seems rather odd. You are not Jonathan Howard, you are controlling this post and its outcome. Writing about such antics, now that’s good content. :) SEO that. Screenshot taken.

          • Nyla G

            Hmmm. just finished a blog on Danny’s comments on this post. You are right! The first sentence of his post has been removed. Very interesting.

            Danny’s comments were:

            “Well, lets be honest the only reason we are all here is because we submitted our site to a crappy “100 best search engines” submission.” Slightly hypocritical…and MARK, if you don’t like SEO you would not have comments enabled on your post”
            Danny June 26, 2011 @ 8:49am webpronews.com

        • Steve Ryan

          Ha, Johnathan. Nyla seems to have caught you out. Bad publicity, good publicity? You mean like O J Simpson. No I don’t think his comment has increased the SEO of this content at all mainly because this post is on every other “SEO expert” blog post.

          You do realize that the only keywords in this page are “search,seo,spam”.

          You Johnathan are the one who should not comment on topics you do not understand.

          This article is on businessgrow.com, http://www.xydo.com, hubpages.com, http://www.squidoo.com, http://www.netbuilders.org, http://www.thecodebakery.com, adsenseadwordsseo.com, http://www.engineclique.com, http://www.europerank.com, http://www.seo-pro.co.il, seowebneturls.info, http://www.shooanswers.com, http://www.businessfountains.com, http://www.alexa.com

          By the way, “webpronews” ranks 21 in that list.

          Unsubscribe thanks

          • Steve – We have a blog partner relationship with Mark Schaefer, where WebProNews republishes certain articles from his blog. This is beneficial to both Mark and WebProNews.

            The other websites you list above are either scraping WebProNews content or are linking to WebProNews content. That is easily discernible by looking at their sites.

            If you search Google for the title of this article, Why SEO Disgusts Me, WebProNews actually ranks number 1, not 21.

            I think the fact that this article has over 150 comments is indicative that the WebProNews audience believes this article is worth reading.

            Thanks,
            Rich Ord
            CEO, iEntry, Inc. & Publisher of WebProNews

        • Rick

          It makes sense. He’s just pointing out (or was, until his post was edited) that most SEO is spam. Why does the fact he uses those methods himself invalidate his point that the article is perhaps hypocritical?

  4. No wonder i am not getting the best search results with appropriate keywords.

    Oh well, i guess i just have to spent more time developing better contents instead worrying about these shenanigans.

  5. This is just one aspect of “black hat” SEO practices…and there are many out there that exist. As an SEO webmaster and owner of an insurance brokerage in New York, I find myself spending more and more time submitting spam reports to Google than working on my site and blogs.

    Here are two examples of other shady practices I’m seeing, and which Google appears to be turning a blind eye to:

    -Keyword stuffing in semi-hidden pages (and I mean OVERWHELMINGLY BLATANT stuffing)
    -”For Sale” websites (seriously?)

    The two bullet points mentioned above represent two of my top-10 competitors of my primary targeted, long-tail keyword phrases. Now while I can understand keyword stuffing spam reports can take a long time for Google to analyze due to many “grey areas” associated with them, how can Google allow a site to exist with a main image banner of “This Website Is For Sale”? In fact, if you e-mail the webmaster of this site (which has no contact phone # by the way), no one ever gets back to you. I tested this by e-mailing a request for an auto insurance quote and never got a response.

    I understand the SERP’s war is fierce but things are getting way out of control.

  6. Harold Michaels

    There are many people and companies who are recruiting and paying chump change to people on Freelance work sites. The “job” often being that where one has to post to as many forums or blogs as humanly possible and they’ll get paid for doing a hundred submissions… which of course all get checked up on so if one of the comments get deleted before the “employer” checks it, you WON’T GET PAID. Quite a con.

  7. @MD Great Commments here!

    MD says:
    June 26, 2011 @ 8:20am

    Apart from the SEO rubbish, the worst thing about the internet is that the majority of traffic generated downloading waste-less comments such as this. This page alone is 1054 KB. Uncompressed it is 1824kb. Really? The original article is 1 1/2 pages long. I don’t want to download another 20 pages of strangers opinions, another 1 1/2 Mb. We don’t really care about what you think, what you tweet or if you “Like It”. I am against even writing this… Just write some good content for a change. If it is good, they will come. Our site has a robots file that simply contains DISALLOW: /* and we attract high traffic. SEO is the late night infomercial of the internet and any “SEO specialist” is the “I am not a paid actor” with the fake 6 pack and the orange face.

    Anyone can have good marketing, only a few have something worth advertising. -MD

    • Pete

      Nice comments. Too the point and quite right! Sorry for commenting though..had too.

      • Tim

        Yeah Pete, I can’t believe you just left a comment…I never comment on … oh wait.. er… doh!!

        • Using that in your robots txt file means your whole site isn’t getting indexed or crawled by search spiders. Must be nice to have a large PPC budget to rely on (I include banner ads in this, not just Adwords).

          Kinda seems like cutting your nose off to spite your face, especially since you imply that you have a lot of good content on your site, that apparently would rank highly in organic search results but the spiders are ignoring it.

          To each his own I guess…

          Jim

          • sam

            I think they know that their site is not indexed if they state that their robots file contains disallow /*. Ha, well you would hope so! Wish I could do that, that takes b@lls!!

            Kinda understand their point a little though… Remember, the internet existed before SEO and people found stuff back then, didn’t they? SEO is only what a search engine “thinks” is good and does not imply quality content, it only implies popularity and as people interested in “computers” we should not put much weight on “popularity”. Remember the popular girl at school is now the chick that nobody cares about. She had the “keywords” but now lacks the quality. That makes no sense. Good article Mark.

  8. Agree with you absolutely! It’s hard enough to compete as a business online without the big guys unfairly stacking the deck in their favor. Also, agree that bringing in the regulation, which stifles us all, because of some who abuse their freedom burns me up.

  9. I for one (and sometimes I feel like the only one) am all about ethics in SEO.
    I absolutely agree that comment spam, paying for poorly written junk-blog articles, etc are all ridiculous. Not only are they possibly fraudulent, they also make it very hard for those of us who practice ethical means of promoting websites to do business. People either don’t trust us, or want us to do the black hat crap so they can compete immediately. I have a much more patient philosophy – let the competitors hang themselves with their own tactics…
    I get the same automated, butchered-English comments too, but I try to have a little fun with them.
    A while back, I had one particularly good comment on a post about ethical SEO which praised me for my “understanding on article articles” and telling me “you is rocks!”

    The post and ridiculous spam comment are here.http://kercommunications.com/seo/ethical-seo-guaranteed-search-engine-results/#comment-161

    Comments like that are almost as much fun as the SEO spam emails we all get. But you are right – this stuff is going to make trouble for everyone. I’d really like to see the companies who offer that kind of “service” get slapped. I am also tired of doing damage control for new clients who have tried some fly by night SEO and ended up with ridiculously bad blog articles about their business appearing on spam blogs.

    I keep my comments in a jquery collapse to try to minimize the spam so look for the link at the bottom to view comments.

    And yes, I is rocks and you is rocks too.

    • Hi Nick. I’ve dealt with some similar issues, and pondered what to do when my “article articles is very good information great and other good things around”, but as I asked Mark in my comment below, what do you think should be done. I’m curious about the “slap” you would like to have take place, and how you think it could be enforced. Just wanted to get your take. All the best.

  10. Sylvie Dale

    I agree – when I first started doing SEO for a large company, that kind of linkbuilding was a common practice and it made me uncomfortable to do it. Instead, I went way beyond the requirements of the job to create good blog posts that were on-topic for my clients – blog posts I proudly showed them and they approved. As a former online editor/Web content manager, I had the journalism training to do this well. But this left a gap in the linkbuilding work; luckily I was helping clients that had no prior SEO so they needed the foundation first – proper setup of the website, well-organized and plentiful content, getting their blog set up, etc. We got good rankings in these little niche markets and I was able to largely avoid the blog commenting.

    Now I work for a company that prides itself on honest SEO work; following best practices and cooperating with search engines and not trying to trick them in any way. With Google’s Panda updates, I tend to agree with others that content will be king – but it’s got to be relevant, interesting, and unique!

    Perhaps there is still a place for talented journalists who are flexible and enterprising.

  11. webmarketingmaster

    This is nothing new. I’ve been using spam blog comment links for years. There are even complex software programs available to automate the blog commenting process on a massive scale. Some of the software can scrape the search engines for specific blog posts to comment on based upon the topic or keyword….then post a spun comments while rotating the urls and anchor text all on autopilot. And these are just some of the basic features of these products.

    If you want your site to rank in the search engines you need links. The fastest and easiest way to get the links is to outsource it or automate it. Your not going to get them organically.

    Blog commenting links are just one strategy for getting links. There’s article marketing, bookmarking, directory submissions, link exchanges, paid links, and more. There will always be people out there buiding links and more and more sophisticated software to automate the process. Since higher search engine ranking = money people will do what ever is needed to get the links and the money.

  12. John

    This is good post. This is some good important facts about the corporate blogs. Do you have any information on how to manage comments on the blog. I think http://www.google.com/ might have an idea. Chech it out.

  13. well said. anyone who puts their professional integrity before making a buck is doing the “right” thing.

    • Andy

      Basically, the opposite of a receptionist.

  14. C4

    Good article, thank you. This is just one of the many ways so called seo providers scam the system. Some create fake linkedin profiles to seem as if they have larger companies, its silly really. Good news is that corruption never wins, and people like this will eventually be discovered.

  15. I totally agree – this is disgusting. Another one I hate is the text generation. There are many “blog” sites where the blog is actually generated. When you read them they do not make sense – clearly it is automated but they just have one link in them. And Google indexes these sites. Seriously, it is getting ugly.

    • You will

      You should suck my balls and then see what is generated. Has anyone replied? Seriously, nobody reads comments. SAVE BANDWIDTH, DISABLE COMMENTS ON WEB PAGES. @theinternet

  16. Any business or web professional that knows and understands SEO will get the SEO triggers he needs overtime if the website is worthy and adds value. All the stuff we read about is essentially teaching us to orchestrate SEO tactics to bring us up in search engines. If we sit back and wait for others to blog, social bookmark or comment about us we will be missing the boat. Companies coordinate their own SEO triggers so they become successful. Sitting and waiting will get you in the poor house. That’s the reality of the real world whether you like it or not.

  17. You are correct Mark. Some SEO methods are very deceiving, and should be illegal, but some SEO companies that provide natural methods are now having to work twice as hard to compete with these illegal overseas linksters. It’s not fair to my clients to have to charge more because these overseas blogsters are driving up prices for legitimate SEO companies. I don’t know where it will all end, but I don’t see them closing down those overseas companies. Where there’s money to be made they will be there, and if you closed one then 5 more would pop up to take it’s place. This really does hurt small businesses that are trying to compete with the corporate giants.

  18. Chris

    Honestly, there’s so much BS out there, I’m often tempted to give up.
    You never know what’s real and what’s not. Disinformation, black hat strategies, people that seem to dislike you for whatever reason, one person who tries your product and it doesn’t work for them–so of course they comment on a social networking site, on and on…make a small time entrepreneur like me want to give up. Sometimes I hate the Internet.

  19. With 15 yrs at a big-time Ad Agency in Chicago, before hitting 40 and being replaced with a bunch of hot 22 year olds, I saw first-hand what Fortune 100 clients think of Blogs, the web and SEO. And it isn’t much. I would chalk it up to curiosity and buying into new promotional tactics via slick sales reps (including their trusted Ad Agency who’s selling things they don’t have a clue what they’re talking about).

    Using our top 5 clients as examples, each had a yearly marketing budget of around 5-20 million dollars. Of that, they each spent about $20,000 on web activity. Granted, these are CPG companies that sell in-store, just scratching the surface of web orders. When you consider these clients spend anywhere from $500,000 to $1 million just to place ONE coupon in the Sunday coupon section, $20,000 to experiment with web marketing matches what they spend on liquor alone for just one of their after-parties. It’s not even on the radar.

    After watching curiously, I noticed that our agency-run client blogs are complete scams. For $20,000 we round up maybe two dozen blog posts over a couple weeks, most if not all of the posts are our employees using their personal email accounts. To the clients however, it’s all about ROI and profits. You’ll be safe if you always use that fact as your measurement of success.

    With blogging, link-seeding, etc., there is little or no ROI, especially for companies who’s whole world revolves around getting their products on Walmart’s shelves. And for clients like ours, selling $0.50 candy bars over the internet is a financial loss. Thanks to the magic of ‘channel partners’ like wholesalers, brokers, stores and distributors, CPG companies can sell millions without any cost at all. And without the headaches of the internet, which none of the corporate execs understand anyway.

    My theory is that we are still in the middle of the global ‘test’ and that test will fail miserably. Again, unless your company ONLY sells via the internet, the internet is simply not worth the hassle. One example is corporate branding and logo standards – which CPG’s take VERY seriously. It’s easier and cheaper to manage one national retailer or agency to insure brand and logo standards are being followed than it is to manage and babysit thousands of individuals, many of whom don’t even speak English or care.

    To make a long story short, too late I know :) , Fortune 100 clients are currently being less than honest when they smile and pat their agencies on the back for their SEO, blog and web efforts. Privately, they see these efforts as a financial loss. However, due to their lack of understanding of the internet and the unpredictable future of it, they are still sticking with it, for now. But it’s only a matter of time before they officially admit that paying agencies to blog and create a web presence for their products and brand isn’t worth it and only creates more headaches than profits. When that finally happens, I think the rest of us will be able to go back to the basics and let the dishonest SEO market concentrate on the thin layer of clients that benefit from it – porn sites, gambling sites, pharma, start-ups, etc.

    For the last 6 or 7 years, the cry was , “we need to create a brand experience” or “we need to make a personal connection with our customers and keep them engaged with our brand”. But the fact is, teenage girls don’t want to download corporate jingles from their tampon manufacturer, little kids would rather watch real cartoons than dumb agency-created clips, and teenage boys would rather play actual video games online than play pathetic corporate-generated games where the most they can do is choose which corporate colors to use to dress the brand’s mascot. If it’s all about ROI, SEO and blogs should being going the way of the dinosaur very soon.

    Until then however, we’re going to keep our eye on the ball. Our website and news outlet is only two months old. Rather than spend our time and efforts on tricking Google into referring more readers to us via bogus return links, we spend all our time accumulating REAL links from REAL sites and genuine referrals from legitimate sites who’s readers actually value and follow-up on recommendations. That way, no matter which way the tricks and trends of SEO go, we should be okay. We’ll never be on the top of the search list. But as long as we concentrate on delivering content that people want and enjoy, we believe we’ll always be in the thick of things and that’s good enough for us, especially knowing our internet web isn’t hollow and fake. It’s real. It’s passionate. And it’s what SEO and web agencies all PRETEND to have. All we can do is hope that the old tried and true will always be the rule – quality products and services create repeat business. SEO and marketing scams only create customers who feel misled, used and tricked. You don’t get much repeat business that way. And in the world of business, repeat customers are the future, not bogus web links.

    • Walmart

      This comment is better than the article itself! Sorry Mark, even with your so called 28 years of sales and marketing experience http://www.whiteoutpress.com/ seems to know a lot more about this topic than you. Surly with a qualification in behavioral sciences you should understand that smart people do not tolerate stupidity.

    • That is a pretty remarkable comment and well-written. Thanks for sharing.

  20. Jim

    I give up long ago on SEO, who really has the time to constantly wade though this stuff…

    I build my websites with good content… then turn on paid advertising…

  21. Dave

    This great is article, but have you seen www. ??

    Just kidding Mark, I actually agree wholeheartedly with your feelings on this topic. It would be an ideal world where the efforts we put into white hat SEO do not pose any risk of being out ranked by someone following these ‘gray hat’ practices. Certainly Google are aware and there can be no doubt have some bright sparks working on the best way to combat it.

    However we should not deter encouraging our clients, the real experts in whatever business they are in to actively seek out blogs and forums and become regular contributers in order for recognition.

    Unfortunately I’ve found that it’s bloody hard pursuading clients that they need to find time to carry out such practices, they want the extra business without having to engage in the SEO campaigns themselves.

    I tend to make use of Google alerts and setup instant alerts for discussions on various topics relating to my campaigns, then when something does appear that I think my clients could contribute too, I let them know.

    PS. I’d love to know exactly what that $200’000 pcm campaign entails.

    Dave

  22. James Real World

    Its business, its that simple. If you go into an electrical retailer and expect them to sell you the best TV you are insane, they will sell you the one with the biggest amount of commission for their pocket and usually the worst TV.

    Get a grip. Business is NOT honourable, if you think any of the conglomorate corporations got to the top by playing fair you are top busy believing in fairys to win at business. I used to work for a marketing company and I can tell you they all partake in dodgy practices, the key is to outsource the bad business practices so if they are caught they blame the sub contractor.

    • Oh dammit James, you’re probably right! but doesn’t it chap your hide to know such crap is going and (and winning) @ such antics?

  23. Mark, candidly, your lead in sentence “Before my SEO friends get their panties in a wad over today’s headline” was almost as appealing to me as your HEADLINE. I couldn’t agree with you more! It took me a long time to ID, research, partake in, build a reputation and contribute content to many dozens of relevant sites (blogs, video servers, forums) in order to come up with a pretty solid Link Wheel that I share with my clients, based on their niche, their target audience and the other metrics that actually mean something. Ever since Google Panda hit the street (even v2) I’ve been reminding my readers and customers, quality content counts a LOT and not to get their panties in a wad if competitor B. improves in the SERPs last week as a result of his getting 50x more links than I did for him.

    That LIST of 23 questions you should know about your site’s content (would you trust this site w/ your credit card # etc.) is a strong 1st path litmus test. Still, its hard to fight City Hall when you competitor uses the tactics you mentioned above.

    I want to take the high road on this, but until Panda/Farmer can expose the SEO shops that hire and use the mechanical turk method of getting links to PR4+ sites, its going to remain a slug-fest and leap frog model when it comes to link building and pagerank status?

  24. I have always thought of SEO as an art because to get good rankings on the search engines it does take some skill. The problem is that everyone of course wants to be number one and as we know that is not possible.Almost daily people are trying to come up with easy or underhanded methods of getting good rankings and I see this as a trend. There was a time when having SEO skills was enough even if you were the little guy you could compete! Not so much anymore!

  25. Sarah Barker and Danny win the prize- split a year’s worth of SEO services between them.

  26. I couldn’t agree more. I’m just a little fish and I feel that I don’t have a chance at getting “ranked”.

  27. Hi Mark. First, let me say that your column really hit home on something that has really been bothering me lately, aka the “blog-from-home-fictional-persona”. I understand the reasons for it, but I can tell you as a business person trying to combat comments, blogs, and articles that involve poor grammar, often make no sense, and are generally created in vast numbers, my question to you would be, “What would you do?” You speak in terms of black and white, and I agree with a lot of what you say, but I am curious as to how you would deal with this epidemic. Thanks again for the great article, and best wishes.

  28. You are so right about that. I am promoting this site, http://www.nutrients-shopping.com, more for the reason to find out how the SEO business works. So far, it seems to me that the only thing that works is what you are describing in your article. And I am trying to do it “by the book” and it’s just not working. I do not have enough resources and time to keep up with the materials that I should put on the web for bringing my site on a favorable position. It’s really not fair. Maybe Google should re-strategize its objective in the direction of “catching” the unfair competition. Or maybe we should not wait on Google. Maybe we should look into finding other means of reaching to our online customers. Or maybe, we, who wish to work “clean”, should get together and produce software for combating the “black hat” practices

    • Google wants big companies to rank high, not small businesses like yours. Who’s more reputable in Google’s eyes; your site or drugstore.com (or some other big name brand). Do what you have to do to rank high if there’s no real penalty. Personally, I buy media so I don’t care or have to worry about what Google does.

    • Go Away

      Your site is terrible and that is the reason why. There is no need to blame it on keywords, yours being “Nutrition Products, Nutrients,shopping”. Your site would have been horrible in 1998 and it is even worse now. It is not about having a site, any site, it is about quality. Your site is an example of what not too do.

  29. Big deal, everyone does this. SEO firms that don’t admit to this are lying. It helps rankings and the penalties are low. SEO is a joke and a game anyway.

  30. I am afraid to reply after all this .
    Well what you say about is true about commenting but this is what Google has encouraged in the first place by placing value on the number of backlinks. If you delete the webiste address section on the comments you will see a dramatic reduction in the number of comments for sure.
    thats one way to increase the quality of comments.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>