Should Google Be Worried about Google+?

New data shows Google+ traffic is plummeting

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:

[ Social Media]

What’s up with Google+? One day, reports say how much the service has grown, and the very next day, they say just the opposite. The unfavorable reports about the social network have even gone to the extreme to call it dead.

Do you use Google+ regularly? We’d love to know.

While the fact of declaring it “dead” is debatable, there are some definite signs that should cause Google to be concerned. For instance, Dan Reimold, the Assistant Professor of Journalism at the University of Tampa, wrote a post entitled “Google+: Social Media Upstart ‘Worse Than a Ghost Town,'” in which he not only called the social network dead, but he also gave a bleak prediction:

“At worst, in the coming months, it will literally fade away to nothing or exist as Internet plankton,” he wrote. “At best, it will be to social networking what Microsoft’s Bing is to online search: perfectly adequate; fun to stumble onto once in awhile; and completely irrelevant to the mainstream web.”

In an interview with WebProNews not long ago, Reimold told us that he came to this conclusion after he realized that he wasn’t finding anything on Google+ that was more interesting or different from the information he was already finding on his other social networks.

Also, a chart released by Michael DeGusta showing the inactivity of Google’s own management on Google+ has done nothing but add to this negative outlook. However, since this chart was released, Eric Schmidt, Google’s Executive Chairman, has begun to use the service.

Google+” class=”aligncenter” width=”565″ height=”527″ />

The biggest blow for Google and its social network was probably last week when Steve Yegge, one of its own software engineers, accidentally published a not-so-flattering post about Google+ on the network itself. In the post, Yegge essentially pointed out what his employer was doing wrong with Google+, making statements such as:

Google+ is a prime example of our complete failure to understand platforms from the very highest levels of executive leadership (hi Larry, Sergey, Eric, Vic, howdy howdy) down to the very lowest leaf workers (hey yo). We all don’t get it.”

And this: Google+ is a knee-jerk reaction, a study in short-term thinking, predicated on the incorrect notion that Facebook is successful because they built a great product.”

Yegge’s post was intended to only go out to his Google circle but was instead shared publicly.

More recently, data analytics firm Chitika released some research that gives Google yet another reason to be concerned. The company looked at Google+ before and after its public launch in late September. Even though Experian Hitwise reported that Google+ grew 1269 percent in the week following its public launch, Chitika’s data shows this surge was only temporary.

Gabe Donnini, an analyst with Chitika, explained to us that the traffic to Google+ grew to peak levels immediately after the public launch but then fell over 60 percent shortly after.

“We just looked at the stats to investigate this trend, and as it turned out, there was a sharp spike and then a sharp decline almost immediately after the days following Google+‘s public beta,” he said.

Google+ Public Launch” class=”aligncenter” width=”616″ height=”366″ />

Donnini told us that he believed the traffic spike was driven by the publicity surrounding the public launch. However, Chitika decided to investigate further and extend the research period beyond the week after Google+ opened publicly. What it found was that the downward trend actually got worse. According to its research, the largest drop in traffic for Google+ was more than 70 percent.

Google+ Research” class=”aligncenter” width=”616″ height=”366″ />

Last week in Google’s Q3 earnings report, CEO Larry Page proudly said that Google+ had surpassed 40 million users.

Google+ is now open to everyone and we just passed the 40 million user mark,” he said. “People are flocking into Google+ at an incredible rate and we are just getting started!”

This is a large number especially considering that the network has only existed for a few months. But, as Chitika data shows, it doesn’t mean that all these users are active.

According to Donnini, the lack of activity from users is due to many reasons. First of all, users can’t import or sync their existing networks into their Google+ network.

“There’s very little incentive to share if you don’t have anyone to share with,” he said.

He also believes that users are inactive because it took Google a long time to make its API available to developers. As he explained, a large part of the success of social networks is due to the network of services that are built on the overall platform.

“By not providing a developer API in which a useful network of services could be built for their users, Google basically made it much harder for their users to find a way to (a) stay on the site, and (b) they kind of lowered the utility of Google+ as a site for their new userbase,” he said.

He also pointed out, “They don’t need to become Facebook, they need to become what Facebook is going to become.”

Interestingly, Google co-founder Sergey Brin and Google+ czar Vic Gundotra spoke about the social network at the Web 2.0 Summit yesterday. Both indicated they were pleased with the progress of Google+, and Brin even said, “I’m not a social person myself… [but] Google+, I instantly found compelling.”

Gundotra also said that Google+ would allow support in the near future for pseudonyms as well as for Google Apps users to be able to log into Google+ with their accounts. He also indicated that brand pages would be coming too, but not as quickly as the other features.

Are these additions enough to save Google+?

Should Google Be Worried about Google+?
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • J Story

    It is certainly a concern when senior management does not “eat its own dogfood” because, actions trump words and actions show commitment. On the other hand, the graphs are misleading because they cut out the area on the bottom, making it appear that the changes are more important than they actually are. It is one thing for traffic to double briefly while new people come in and kick the tires, but, read carelessly, the graphs suggest that traffic was near zero, then ballooned before returning to near zero — which is simply not true.

  • Bob

    Like I’ve always said, Google is good for nothing. They got lucky with search they don’t even know how. They are losing search share everyday. How’s Groupon killer from Google doing? Dead. It’s like the Royal family in UK, so much money and no dental plan. Sad.

    I predicted Google +’s death within 6 months as soon as they opened for business. Unless they buy the competition, there is no hope for them. They have no heart or common sense to run a good business. All they see is dollar signs.

    • Andres

      Bob it’s clear that you dont’t have a clue where Social is going or what’s about, facebook is only good in one simple algorithm ( suggest friends). Algorithms are google’s hobbies its just a matter of time. Look at google history yes they had fail in some areas before wave been one, but not this time g+ is a good product and improving everyday. Google got on adds now is the king, on search King, on OS for cell phones king, tables just a matter of time, in web apps google is killing MS office 365. Google played smart is everywhere and soon in your wallet is just a matter of time and when they know what you buy and learn who you are they will have social right. Facebook Likedin are just big bubbles.

    • http://www.q3tech.com/technology.html Software Development Services

      I agree with Andres here. Google+ is far from dead. Infact, after it opens up for business, it’ll grow even more. The best part about G+ is that the whole world is not on it. Its a community for knowledgeable, artistic, intelligent and interesting people, unlike facebook, which literally has the world on it.

  • http://www.rudraayurveda.com/ Roy

    there are much better social media site than G+.
    i doubt it G+ will go so far.

  • http://www.invgate.com Amelia @ IT Management

    Google just got into the social media bus a little too late. It’s not hopeless though. Hey! At least they’re on the bus.

    If they get their act together I’m pretty sure they’ll get into a groove. Although it’s a bit daunting with Facebook and disillusioned employees rocking the ride.

  • http://cozumelmexico.net Bob Rodriguez

    Social media is overrated, period.

  • http://www.go-travelguides.com/ Grey Olltwit

    I don’t think Google gives a damn either way. It’s become so complacent in recent years that it believes it’s unsinkable. I recall the days when AltaVista was the king of search and Ask Jeeves was huge along with ICQ instant messaging et al. Well, the bigger they are the harder they fall!

  • http://www.wpwebhost.com Ricardus

    I think Google+ might be a great tool in the future but currently, it’s still at the fundamentals stage. However I like the simplicity of it.

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom