Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Google’s “Not Provided” Referrals Growing In Percentage?

Data indicates average has jumped nearly 8% since changes

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 13 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. This is ridiculous. Yesterday, (not provided) was responsible for 13.72% of my search engine traffic. Looking at Analytics has almost no use now since most long tails worth going after will not be displayed…

  2. This is absolutely bummer for website owners, webmaster, and SEOs. I don’t now why Google implement this feature in Google analytics.

    I clients’ website getting 10% traffic from “Not Provided” how can i show my client that your getting relevant traffic or not.

    If Google really wanted to do SSL search then why not applied in Adwords.

    Thanks,
    WebTrooperz.

  3. It really depends on the industry and your target audience. If you are catering to a professional audience that is likely signed in to their Google account all day, it will obviously have a more profound effect. It’s unfortunate as this data guides SEO decisions and business decisions overall.

  4. Just been putting together data for a client of mine and the 5th most used keyword slot is taken up by ‘not provided’. It is not helping them to know what judgements to make on keyword choices or us to show how the SEO efforts are being rewarded.

    I’m not interested in knowing the data for my own sake, but how are webmasters supposed to make conversion choices?

    Moreover how is hiding the referring keyword protecting the users? We cannot identify them personally whatsoever so I really do not see the value in hiding these keywords.

    • That’s not exactly true. You’re forgetting about the internet providers that spy on us all the time and for sure know who we are. See, I would have favored if Google made it so that the information was still made available if you were using Google Analytics, but would not be transmitted to your web server directly. I don’t know how exactly that would work as Google Analytics gets a lot of it’s data from the visitor’s browser, but I’m sure the smart people at Google can figure that out. I suppose through the use of cookies which they already use.

      So a secure way to insure that the data is only going to be available to the website owner and not anybody that’s a middleman (such as internet providers) of the traffic would be welcomed by me. However, the affect it is having is harming a lot of websites to the point that if you ask around, publishers are wondering what else can Google do to harm their website.

  5. How could logged in searches not increase over time? I mean Google is pushing for users to log into any one of their many services, Gmail, Adsense, Adwords, Google+, the list goes on and on. And so who’s going to make sure they’re logged off of a service before they do a search on Google? So the more that users are using one Google service or another that requires them to log in the more that vital information is going to be withheld.

  6. May Be It's Me

    I’ve had, so far today:

    (not provided) Visits = 5179 Percent: 11.28%

  7. I think the more important question is what to do about it. My guess is that Google wants website owners to stop focusing on keywords and ranking and more on content that serves customers. There’s still plenty of data that lets you see what are your best pages in terms of traffic and conversions, and through Google’s keyword tool, you still have access to all the search queries occurring through Google. And Google is still telling us which pages are the landing page for these suppressed keywords, and so we can at least infer what those keywords are.

    In many ways the game hasn’t changed, unless you’ve been focused mostly on keywords (and rankings). You can still do “keyword analysis,” but you can’t (as much as before) tell how much traffic those keywords created. Instead you need to look at the traffic and conversions your getting from any page you’ve created. That’s entirely different (and I think more productive) focus. In short, this is forcing you to look into your analytics and look at traffic and pages and conversions in order to better try to understand what your website visitor needs and wants, which always made more sense to me anyway.

  8. obin

    If the statistics is true in percentage then it is ridiculous. But I think there is some misunderstanding in the information. Thank you for an important post. It topic should be now in most considerations.

    Harvest Hills dog walking

  9. We started out at 19% the first month it started, then dropped to 14% and have consistently been growing and are at 21% now. So, a fifth of our traffic keywords are “Not Provided”.

  10. Bill

    This is nuts. We built Google, that is to say that we made them what they are. Now they presume to tell us “we don’t need you any more. Or, is it that they are simply looking for more add revenue (pay-per-click).

    The idea that security is now a concern is a smoke screen.

  11. We were seeing around 3-6% which I was sort of ok with, because we were getting the numbers back through a couple of reverse engineering techniques from various blogs, but now our percentage is this: (not provided) 10.1% 121 visits!

    How can anyone run a success business online with out knowing what your top converting keywords are? HELLLOOOOOO GOOGLEEEEE? you have cut your own throat here!

    Not with Google at ALL on this one. Basically they are trying to hide there network from other 3rd party sources that are trying to utilize Google for there own products and tools, however they have almost completely wiped out the hand that feeds… their CUSTOMERS!

    Bing anyone? anyone? Bueller?

  12. I am getting 40% as ‘not provided’ keywords in my “keyword conversions” custom reporting section. Is there any other free analytic software where i can track proper keyword conversions.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>