Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Google’s Algorithm Change: When Too Many Ads Attack

Does your site look like a telephone pole covered with ads?

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!

If your site looks like one of those “Post No Bills” wall that’s covered in assorted flyers, ads, and various forms of clutter, there’s a good chance Google’s new algorithm change will result in these ad-covered sites being punished, especially if the ad assault appears above the fold. News of Google’s latest algorithm adjustment, something that’s been hinted at before, was recently announced on Google’s Inside Search blog, and the details are pretty straightforward, that is, until you ask “how much is too much?”

Are you one of the site owners Google is referring to? If so, do you plan on moving your ads around or are you going to wait and see what happens? Let us know if Google’s new algorithm adjustment affects you.

While there is no “x amount of ads exceeds our standard,” the blog post does offer some theoretical details about how the change targets the “too many ads” sites, while emphasizing their “above the fold” standard. The [emphasis added] sections are ours:

This algorithmic change does not affect sites who place ads above-the-fold to a normal degree, but affects sites that go much further to load the top of the page with ads to an excessive degree or that make it hard to find the actual original content on the page. This new algorithmic improvement tends to impact sites where there is only a small amount of visible content above-the-fold or relevant content is persistently pushed down by large blocks of ads.

This algorithmic change noticeably affects less than 1% of searches globally.

For more on Google’s change:

How Is Google’s Algorithm Update Determining “Ads Above The Fold”?
If you’re a user then you’re probably clapping and cheering Google for this update. If you’re an SEO expert, or an owner who’s sole income comes from a website or group of websites then depending on how neurotic you are, you’re either slightly concerned or freaking out… Read more here

Google’s Ad Related Algorithm Update Analyzed By Experts
There’s one specific aspect of this topic that many experts have been questioning, and it’s whether or not Google is being hypocritical in regards to their latest algorithm changes penalizing sites with too many ads above the fold… Read more here

The question everyone is asking is how much is too much? Does Google have a number of ads in mind before it starts dolling out updated algorithm punishments? Based on what Google’s saying, if the ads make accessing the actual on-page content a chore, and the proliferation of ads appear above the fold, there’s a good chance your site will be stung.

As indicated, Google made the point of saying the new adjustment will only affect under one percent of searches, meaning, from Google’s perspective at least, the act of stuffing ads on a site, ads that obfuscate the content, is not an epidemic. From Google’s perspective, the updated algorithm is presented as a housecleaning tool, one that improves a user’s search engine experience by pushing ad-loaded sites down, while bringing the quality content up, at least theoretically.

For those sites that might have been punished in lieu of the new algorithm adjustment, unfortunately, you may be stuck with your site’s adjusted position in Google’s index, even if you make the necessary changes immediately after you’ve been punished. As pointed out by Danny Sullivan, around the time the above-the-fold ads algorithm change went live, he received an email from Google’s AdSense team, suggesting his personal blog put more ads on it, and they even sent a diagram suggesting how these ads should be positioned around the content.

Essentially, Google wants the content surrounded by ads, they just don’t want you to over do it, especially for content appearing above the fold. Google’s email also refers its recipients to a video about ad placement, which also suggests avoiding a proliferation of ads, especially at the top of the page:

Essentially, the lesson is this: don’t let ads push your site’s on-page content down, unless you risk being punished. Furthermore, the algorithm update punishes the entire site, not just the pages that have lots of ads above the fold. This means if 99 percent of your site is compliant, but you forgot to clean up one of you ad-heavy pages that obscures the content, there’s a chance the site as a whole will be dinged by the new algorithm.

The question is:

Google ad-heavy SERPs
Click for larger image

Will Google punish themselves?

As you can see, the search engine results page for the query “Samsung TV” pushes the organic content almost off the page. What happens when the gatekeeper quasi-violates their own rule, especially when they are making a point to inform site owners about the potential damage they can cause search engine rankings by making their pages top heavy with advertisements?

Does Google’s new algorithm change give you pause when it comes to placing ads on your sites or is this much ado about nothing? Let us know what you think.

Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 55 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. Google Search should then tell Google Adsense to stop sending out emails saying that we haven’t added enough adsense ads on our sites.

    • I agree with you James! It’s like the right hand doesn’t know what the left one is doing!

  2. How much is too much? I have 4 banner ads around the content. Will Google punish it with its new algorithm?

    • Above the fold means the portion of the site that is visible without scrolling down.

      Avoe the fold is a term borrowed from the newspaper industry where the articles that appeared ‘above the fold’ were considered to have been given premium placement since the readership could be as much as twice as high for articles appearing ‘above the fold’.

  3. I own a retail site and my site is set up to advertise my own products and most of these ads are above the fold. Will this affect my PR? Also, whT if I wanted tto use a page specifically for nothing but ads and links so it wouldn’t clutter up my product pages or my home page? I don’t see how doing this would effect a customer’s search experience because they wouldn’t have to view that page unless they navigated to it on purpose.

    • HC

      I agree with you. I prefer a separate page for ads, juat as an alternate model for the reader/consumer to enjoy versus the standard crap way of doing Mad.Avenue business. Mad.Avenue, by the way, believes it’s ok to shove crap in our faces that we don’t care about, or to trick us, or screw with our heads. I think they’re deranged.

      And Google is just the next evolution of Madison Avenue douchebagism.

      I prefer the Vogue magazine model of advertising — people buy Vogue specifically to view the ads, that’s where they get a lot of their knowledge about fashion, what’s in and out and so on. Imagine, people seeking advertising on purpose — it would put the MadMen and Google twits out of business, who wouldn’t be able to justify their own (manipulative) existences (and high salaries).

      My experiences with Google suggest they perpetually have their heads up their own behinds, everybody is just too afraid to call them on it.

      (for reference, see the scene in the movie “Men in Black” about the best of the best of the best)

  4. So how will smaller sites gain revenue from their site if google is going to penalise it for having too many ads? and yet surely this is how google makes loads of cash – from advertisers who want their ads displayed on our sites, but surely the advertisers are not going to gain as much exposure for their campaigns if we can not display so many ads,

    I’m confused.

  5. I have a Mona Lisa as a 3d character on you tube!
    they had insight turned into google analytic.
    till the change my Mona lisa had over 150 avr a “day”
    after google took over it is now for several weeks next to zero!!!! what is going on here ?
    google do not respond to several mails from me!!!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdd-5sQrtH0

  6. Funny that they would slap advertisers that use the very same ad placement that they use themselves!

  7. Amazing. Transparent. Shameless.

    Since Google decides how the Internet works for all, and have taken on this “policeman” position of what is right and what is wrong, who will police the police?

    Considering that an enormous part of Google’s revenue comes from…um…oh yes…ads! …this is a very hypocritical position. For clarity, we don’t make any money with ads in any way, so I don’t have a dog in this race.

    I am truly concerned about Google’s changes, not just this one but many of them. They are all so transparent to me. What they are doing is trying to make sure that Google is best positioned to sell ads, and they are controlling what others do to continue and maybe increase their dominance.

    Have you looked at search results on freakin Google lately? What a farce this hypocrisy! Ads everywhere. AdWords and ads in Google Places spots push the “real content” WAY BELOW THE FOLD. Often you don’t see organic content until position 6 or lower.

    Google is all powerful and there is nobody to police them. I will sign off with this: “Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely”. Look out everyone!!l

  8. We need to know what google defines as “an ad.”
    I use IDX links extensively as do most real estates agents. Are these going to be looked at as ads by google?
    Seems like this is another anti competitive move by Google to try to hog the entire Internet advertising market.

  9. james

    People should be able to find what they are looking for on line, not shady adds for loosers to drive up prices to pay loosers that post unwanted adds.

    • James you can’t spell and obviously do not have a brain.

  10. I get so tired of Google playing God.

    I do not rely on any one search engine for my traffic. Thank goodness for that!

    If the big G continues down this route somewhere down the line it will lose out.

    Advertisers investing good money in Adwords campaigns should contact Google ask ask what the bloody hell they are playing at and whether or not Google still wants their money.

  11. My website went from on Alexa to in the 1,000,000 family group to the 5,000,000 family group. Combination of new rules and I was taking the time during the algorithm changed everyone fears to update my pages, better, titles, descriptions, keywords and content. I shot myself in the foot as you say. I went from making $2200 in commisions on my links to $345 this month. Still working to add to my site and doing my best with google, but for the average person who can not afford the hourly wage of a programmer. I am struggling. My sales are coming back but slowly. I indexed all my pages on my google webmaster tool account and opened a alexa account. any more suggestions?

    • If alexa is so important to you, (no idea why) just get your friends to install their toolbar and visit your site, your alexa rankings will shoot sky high, although I can think of many other ways of wasting your time more productively.

  12. CHECK THIS OUT – VERY IMPORTANT – SPREAD THE WORD:

  13. The gatekeeper doesn’t quasi-violate their own rule,
    because they have the rule above all that says we
    (Google) can do what we want.
    Arrogance, hypocrisy and greed defines Googles brand.
    Of course it’s all about making sure most money for ads
    is spent with Google and not with others.
    So they found a clever way to punish site owners who
    finance their website with ads (other than adsense) too.

  14. Does this affect websites that promote affiliate products?

  15. Mary Pearson

    My estimated earnings and finalized earnings for Nov and Dec were so huge that I went on the AdSense Forum to find out why (since there is no way to contact Googe). There are pages and pages of publishers who are upset about this. For months we have been complaining, and only yesterday did Google address the issue with an unsatisfactory response. None of us are to be reimbursed, and they will not provide us with details of our own accounts to clarify the discrepancies.

    To see the complaints, follow the thread at http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?fid=3d1732834a6407c60004b6fe6d29269d&hl=en

    Google wants us to advertise for them but they don’t want to pay fairly for the space we provide for them. There are an awful lot of people who are pretty ticked off. I am looking for an alternative.

    • Javyan

      AdSense = Smatly-crafted scam

  16. Good, I am sick of seeing so many above the fold ads. On some sites there is close to 0% content visible above the fold due to being completely covered with various ads. Google is a big offender themselves and the way my search results look after this Google Search plus your world is terrible.

  17. I hate fucking ads!!Period.
    When i want something i do a search/research, find what i want then buy it.
    End of story.

    Punish away!!

    • So – what if a completely terrific product cannot rank well (yet) and cannot be found by you?

    • So what funds the sites you visit?

  18. Strange that google doesn’t see their own adverts in first post of many forums as intrusive, so many forums have google as top banner adverts, side banner and now included in first post, maybe it’s just other advertisers that should be penalised in their minds?

  19. I think what this means is that they will raise the price of ads for advertisers

  20. Many thanks for video. Very much all so граммотно is built, we use and Google analyzes
    __________
    Repair of laptops http:// http://www.scp-garant.ru/in St.-Petersburg

  21. I have one particular site I think of when reading this. I’m going to take action immediately because I’ve had negative feedback about it anyway. I really like the way it looks, but it may be too much for the eye. Unfortunately, I believe Google has crawled most of my sites already today.

  22. I’m sure they’ll punish people with banner ads on their sites. But it’s doubtful they’ll punish people who have their precious Adwords ads above the fold. We’ll see if THEY actually give up income for an algo change for once!

  23. Sounds like Google caught the Nanny-Bug!

    They are going to protect me from to many ads because I’m to much of a moth or to stupid to know the difference between the content and the ads.
    Typical Liberal Think!!!!!!

  24. sr

    It looks like I’m just going to have to ride out the storm. I already know that if I place my ads below the fold and away from people’s faces I won’t make any $ and I’m spending all of my time wrighting helpful articles for free.

    • No offense meant, but I advise you to use “spell check” when you are “wrighting” those helpful articles.

  25. Javyan

    Awww… Someone please look at their SERPs. They are aggressively putting all sort of ads on their pages to recover $500m penalty that they had to sustained recently for displaying illegal drugs on AdWords. Do No Evil = Do a # of Evil

  26. help me to page 1 google

  27. help me in google

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>