Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Google “Search, Plus Your World” Makes Google More Personal Than Ever

Good or bad, it makes Google+ even more relevant to search visibility

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 24 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. James Pakele

    Google tried to partner with FaceBook… FaceBook didn’t want to give Google access to their user information, that is WHY there is a Google+

    If FaceBook isn’t included in this, it’s the fault of FB, not Google…

    • I wasn’t trying to fault Google for this. Simply stating that without FB data, it won’t be as good or complete as it would be otherwise.

  2. Hi! It was really interesting to read this article. I opened my Google plus profile since 3/4 months. Actually, I’m not posting everyday new links and stuff because I was not seeing benefit to use it.But, now with new personalizations I think I will spend more time on Google Plus. The only thing I’m hating about Google Plus is that I can’t edit my profile URL.Grrrr..:)

  3. Saffron

    nope nope nope… one of my favorite things about google is that it’s not my stuff or my mind, I’m not this self centered to want a computer to guess about me and serve my own interestes…how would I expand my mind?… it’s the great wide open, the unknown.. fresh knowledge, intelligence expansion.

  4. Search should be completely objective. If I want to narrow my search by local, for instance, I can include that in the search criteria. I do not like what they are doing.

  5. Google seems to be modeled after the US government.Do you really want them involved in EVERYTHING you do?

  6. Dalton

    Horrible! This will give advertisers direct access not only to me, but also to my friends profiles so that we all can get a barrage of unwanted emails from websites just because one of my thousands of “friends” clicked on the “like” link for a particular website?! I don’t think so. There is such a thing as too much personalization. And it’s one thing for spammers to get my email address without my permission, but now they’ll have access to my personal profile as well as all of my friends profiles? This is too much personal information being shared with the gazillion websites out there who are already hungry for my information. Google is going to push this to the extreme and the reaction will be the end of social marketing because no one will ever want to click on the like button for any reason whatsoever. I hope Google will decide to back off of this. There are better ways to make their social media site more popular. They don’t have to rush it. It’ll get there in plenty of time.

  7. Sure, send our prospective clients to the people who can afford $1.35, show them all those sites and help them put us out of business. Just what Google has done to shrink our visitors all ready should be a crime. I am sick of software that thinks it knows what I want better than I do, starts out with limits on where the search results are located and expects me to go bankrupt to pay for click.

  8. Google has gotten just a little too personal in my opinion, and Facebook isn’t any better.

  9. Is there a war going on for social media hegemony? I mean where is the creativity. Google is “Google” because of innovation. Google plus wouldn’t take off unless it gives users a reason to abandon other social networks like FB. After all you’ve only 24 hours in a day. How could users glue to many of them?

  10. This news makes me yawn. In Google’s imaginary world where everyone wants to constantly connect with strangers when they are conducting searches online I am sure this makes sense but in the real world there is a definitive limit to how much “connecting” a person wants to do. I use search for information and social networks for connecting with my online people and have no interest in seeing those two platforms combined. Except for the small percentage of techies and elite blog writers that big G pals around with this is small news.

    • Oh and let me add, I LIKED the fact that Google was impersonal. Keep making changes like this they might just allow some “new Google” to gain a foot hold. Change it too much and people will leave and look for something similar and familiar.

  11. I really am not interested in yet ANOTHER social media. And I trust google as a search engine. I have tried the others and the results are terrible. It is just going to make searching more convoluted. Not happy about it. And as a website owner I have one more thing to maintain? REALLY? If they do it then they need to partner with posterous or one of the other companies that let you post from one source to all these crazy social medias. And by the way, love facebook, hate LinkedIn, myspace and all those others that I feel like I ‘HAVE TO” participate in but thankfully posterous helps me. All I can say is GOOGLE try to place nice with others and make our lives easier.

  12. When I search, I’m not looking for what I like or do, I want to know what others do or like. I want an objective assessment of importance, not my subjective preferences. I want a sanity check, not a reminder of my habits. Personalized search is like inbreeding: a warped view of the world.

  13. In theory this may seem like a good idea to the users who mainly use the internet as a form of communication. However, when it comes to search I can’t really see how this would be of benefit. When people search for Florida holidays if signed in to Google+ the results displayed will be of any social communication regarding the term. So in fact if you want serious results you would have to sign out? I use a dictionary to find out the definition of words I do not know, like wise I use Google to find out information I don’t know about. If I was to then search for this term while logged in I would see pictures and comments from my social group about their “Florida holiday” experiences, not the kind of information I was actually after!

  14. Allison

    Bad, bad, bad idea. I already thought it was too limiting to get search results based on your location (I even hate it when sites automatically re-direct you to your country’s version of their webpage). As I use Google much more for research and information, than for personal issues (ok. maybe once in a while I’ll look for something in my city, like once a month), this new Google search seems like it’s cutting me out of expanded knowledge and access to information.

  15. Bill

    EVIL is the word. Young people are duped into thinking this is all alright while their lives are completely documented by strangers with no scruples for profit. Forget about all the talk about relevance and usefulness. This is a rip off of your personal privacy and NOTHING good will come out of it. Cancel your facebook page. Delete your google+. Dump twitter and linkedin. Don’t use any site that uses disqus.com. It is all garbage designed to control your destiny. I’ve been in technology since the early 80′s. None of this is good for you.

  16. While I don’t like it because I feel the “filter bubble” continues to dumbs down the info we get from the web (“news my way”), Google really doesn’t have a choice – they can’t crawl Facebook and searchers apparently want this info in their search results. Reason to be even more careful about what you post on Social Media.

  17. I’m not thrilled about this. Google is great for research and is a viable tool for promoting our business. Google basically replaced the library, or at the least, made information more accessible. If the brain trusts are worried about competing with other social media entities they should expand on Google+ and leave the traditional Google as it was.

    • I don’t like this at all. I don’t like any of this “social networking”. All it got me was an evil, psychopath stalker I haven’t been able to shake for almost 6 years.I liked it when the Internet was the REAL info super highway. Not when Suzy’s dogs name was the be all and end all info of my day…

      I just deleted my Google+ profile. I’m done with all this crap. It’s dangerous, senseless and nothing but a waste of time.

      Where can one even search for REAL and USEFUL information any more??? (sigh)

  18. Basically, Twitter and Facebook seem to be against giving Google more power by allowing them access to their data, even though this would be better for users generally. Facebook have joined up with Bing instead, right?

    I kind of miss the twitter real-time search feature of Google, I found that really useful.

    • Me too. That’s why I’m baffled to see Twitter complaining about this now, rather than this being an issue when the two companies couldn’t come to an agreement on realtime search last year.

  19. Frank

    Oh what happened to the good basic Google? now filled with trash on every corner of the screen.

  20. Lois

    Whoa, there seems to be a lot of people trashing a free service, that they have no obligation to use. If you don’t like it, delete your Google + account, and use Yahoo from now on. Google is just a compilation of other people’s property – showing you where to find what you need is a free service to you, and don’t underestimate how much work goes into programming and coding – time costs money. Advertising is everywhere you look.

    Personalised advertising is not new, direct marketing is old news, and ads have always been targeted to potential customers based on any data available, either freely or paid for.

    Just for the record, I don’t like personalised search results, but you know what I did? I went into my search settings and turned them off.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>