Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Google and Bing Changes You Need to Know About

A lot happening in search this week

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 22 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. The idea of competitors being able to get people to block someone’s site and thus affect the site seems like a potential problem. I would hope if there were enough signals that a site was being blocked by a large number of people that Google would manually review it.

    Hopefully some sort of trust is built into the system so a bunch of day old accounts can’t wreck havoc.

    cd :O)

    • Graeme Hunter

      The original search engine was much better than the one they have too. That original search enginem you could go on the sight and imediately get what you asked for. This sight you do not get what you put in you get related sights as well and by the time you go through them all, well you want to give up. Please go back to the search engine that you could get instant access to the sights.

  2. I’m not totally clear on what is the purpose of blocking sites. With these constant improvements in search, will Google or Bing ever offer real time search?

    • moonlight

      For real time search you have to use other engines. There are many engines giving true results instead of the kindergarten kiddy games being employed by Google. Those tricks are for kids.

      Personally, I like DuckDuckGo. The results are true and they don’t track you. I view G as more for the 12 yr. old/teen crowd. For serious search, you’ll need to go elsewhere.

      I want relevant search results and I can’t get that with Google. I expect them to continue losing market share as more and more people wise up and realize you don’t have to be a slave to a freaking search engine. It is there to serve YOU, not the other way around.

  3. The changes Google made replacing Base.google.com with its merchant ‘solution’ has really left car dealerships and car buyers out in the cold. Because autos can not be shipped they are excluded. Yet, in the base plan our car dealership clients saw dozens of car shoppers come their way as a result of their Base listings. That all has come to an end with Google. Is this a sign they will do the same as Yahoo and allow a big car classified company power their auto searches? Are they instead, moving to a pay to play system for the automotive industry? Right now, they are basically telling all car dealers and car buyers not to list or search for cars here…

  4. After reading the post, I have just filed reconsideration request to Google. Hope I will get back reply soon.

  5. Ovi

    Today SEO Services need to be changed and updated much more ofthen than 2 – 4 years ago. The SEO Market is a neverending jurney. People should be aware search is still one of the most ROI of Advertising.

    • moonlight

      Ovi, just what do you think needs to be changed about SEO? If you are using pure organic white hat techniques no change is needed. However, if you’re using grey or black hat in your SEO, then yes, you need to change things.

      As stated by many others in prior articles similar to this, stick with white hat and you will have nothing to worry about.

      I do wonder why I’m seeing so many get away with using black hat. The SERPs are rife with it as well as spam.

  6. Social is bad for search, and search is bad for social.

    These latest attempts to use “social signals” look like desperation measures. Google is having so much trouble with web spam that they’re piling patch on top of patch trying to make it work. Even though using social signals has been a disaster for Google (see Google Places spam), Google is trying even more social signals.

    As others mentioned above, now that Google has added a “block” button (should these be called “hates?”), that a new class of attacks becomes possible. Google already has enough trouble with their “This business is closed” flag in Places. That’s reached the New York Times. This week, even Fox News is criticizing Google (See “Could We Start Trusting the Internet Again?” by John Quain.)

    When the New York Times and Fox News both say there are serious problems with something, there’s real trouble.

  7. Nice article! Do you really think the pagerank has much of an effect on search engine results still?

    Is Bing’s new personalized search replacing? or is it in addition to the Facebook integration that they have been using?

  8. Nice post I RTed. I also wish you talked about the bulleted snippets that was discussed on SEOMoz. I like the Bing’s adaptive search though I like how Bing is trying to stay relevant and up to date.

  9. Chris

    Hi,
    I would like more information about “selling links” and Google policy? What is considered by google as “selling” link? Example, you have on the side of your site a “sponsor” section in which the logo of your sponsor appears with of course the link of their site, is it considered as “selling links” or another example, you do targeted article about a a product and you are paid by the brand to make it, is that count as “selling link”?

    Maybe you start to get my point, site like TLA are selling links between webmasters but if you run your own campain of advertising, is it not another way for Google to seat its position of monopole? It’s a bit Mafia style behavior, you work for us or you don’t work at all. What is doing the Anti trust commission?

    Frankly, since Panda update, my income is close to oblivion, so, if I don’t do sponsorship for my sites now, I can go begging on the street. When you got one website and have to correct it to please google is ok, but when you got many, it takes times (I need at least 6 months to finish that, unless Google change its mind again)

    By the way, Google is stupid, he put classifieds sites in the same basket as content sites, so because a guy post always in more than one site, if he doesn’t post with you first, you’re screwed. Classifieds isn’t content and never will be, so, Google stop with is Panda, it’s enough. I hope Bing will overthrown him, will make Google being less D..k H..d.

  10. Good work would always be in upper hand ad great value.

  11. Our website, http://www.astbearings.com recently lost its PageRank from a 4 to a 1 for no apparrent reason. We have searched high and low for any probable cause and can find none. All of our SEO/SEM efforts have been above board without getting even remotely close to questionable practices. We are at wits end on trying to figure out why the drop to the bottom.

    In the article and video it mentions making a “reconsideration request” to Google. How is this done?

  12. Google may have destroyed themselves with their new search. It’s horrible. The simple fact is, it doesn’t provide helpful search results anymore. It’s too busy reading my mind. Here’s yesterday’s example. Researching data for an article about unemployment rates in the Midwest, I started my search for “Wisconsin unemployment rate August”. Great results. Minutes later, I search for “Indiana unemployment rate August”. What do I get? 10 million results for ‘Wisconsin’ again. I try “Illinois” and what do I get? 10 million results for ‘Wisconsin’. You get the picture.

  13. Well sometimes change is hard to accept but if it’s for the better then I glad for the changes.

  14. With constantly updating our site over the past few months since a lot of changes have take place in regards to google it’s been a real battle to for us to figure out what changes have helped and hurt.
    On one side were getting more traffic, lots more traffic, but, the traffic were getting is not quite that of better quaility / refined or targeted, meaning we get a lot of browsing courious customers now, AKA just looking which dosen’t bother me one bit cause any one of the browsings could be a potential but I started pro mo ads and really pushing the site this year in terms of advertising and being specific with search engines picking us up and between the pushing and marketing on my end and the changes with google its been a headache to really figure out whats working for us and what isnt.
    Im no wizz when it comes to seo but I im not totally brain dead either, I know sales are down across the board in our industry and our site http://www.kentuckyspecialfx.com it’s just gotten so confusing as to know what changes we need to make to get back on track with pushing certian products in the right direction since our company is kinda broad with it’s items.

  15. Thanks for all this information in a summary and the videos as well.

  16. One thing I noticed which you don’t mention is that not all airlines permit the posting of fares. The one that I noticed ws Delta I ran a search on a simple trip from DCA (Reagan National) to ATL (Atlanta Hartsfield) and while the AirTran and other carrier fares were shown, I had to slect and use the “I want to book” tool to see the pricing for Delta. This may be a minor, start up related glitch; but, if it isn’t, then the benefit of using the site is reduced.

  17. Thanks for the updates. It’s good to see the changes in the search engines, and staying on top of what they are looking for. I’ve never been a big fan of personalized search. It goes to far into trying to figure out what the intentions of the searcher is. Google’s algorithm is great at delivering results, why try to personalize it? You can get stuck looking at useless results because of what you searched for in the past.

  18. from Mt.Everest, Annapurna and Kanchenjunga massive. Lord Buddha (Light of Asia) took birth on this amazing country Nepal…
    The great massive Himalaya stretches from Afghanistan to Burma across Pakistan, Northern India, Tibet, Nepal and Bhutan. Where the world’s greatest highest peaks lies within Nepal

  19. I believe the ability to remove a site from search listings AND allow that to influence the overall algorhythm arbitrarily is a potentially dangerous option that invites abuse. Since the individual user now influences the serps in the algorhythm, what is stopping people from abusing the removal of sites systematically from multiple ip addresses and geographic locations to attempt the devaluation of the site being removed from the results? From my perspective, it seems like a feature better left out of the ranking algorhythm altogether and making it a personal preference only.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>