Fonda And Steinem Want Limbaugh Off The Air

Feminists Send Commentary To CNN

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:

Fonda And Steinem Want Limbaugh Off The Air
[ Business]

For years, Rush Limbaugh has been under fire for his comments on air during his radio program, “The Rush Limbaugh Show”. Lately, however, he seems to be going out of his way to incense the public, and his sponsors are dropping like flies.

On Monday, the three co-founders of the Women’s Media Center–Jane Fonda, Robin Morgan and Gloria Steinem–wrote a commentary on CNN.com expressing their disgust that Limbaugh has been allowed to use “degrading language” over the airwaves under the claim that he is protected by the First Amendment rights. As reported earlier by Mike Tuttle, Limbaugh’s supporters feel his rights are being trampled and have blown up the web with explosive comments and arguments.

The commentary comes after a host of Limbaugh’s sponsors pulled their ads and several radio stations dropped his show following incendiary comments he made about law student Sandra Fluke and her advocacy of insurance-covered birth control. As reported earlier this week, Gloria Allred went public with her pursuit of the prosecution of Limbaugh for those same remarks, citing defamation of character.

The commentary talks about particular comments Limbaugh has made in the past and claims that the newest controversial statements are even worse than his “regular sexist, racist and homophobic hate speech”, using examples from his radio show to back up the complaint. It also lists several popular opinions on both Limbaugh and whether the issue is political or not, and goes on to state the opinions of the famous feminists on each matter. It’s clear that they believe Limbaugh is not going to change his ways in the near future:

Limbaugh doesn’t just call people names. He promotes language that deliberately dehumanizes his targets. Like the sophisticated propagandist Josef Goebbels, he creates rhetorical frames — and the bigger the lie, the more effective — inciting listeners to view people they disagree with as sub-humans. His longtime favorite term for women, “femi-Nazi,” doesn’t even raise eyebrows anymore, an example of how rhetoric spreads when unchallenged by coarsened cultural norms.

The opinion piece ends by stating that the FCC should shut down Limbaugh’s show once and for all in a show of support of the sentiment of the general public, and pleads with readers to do what they can in order to take him off the air:

This isn’t political. While we disagree with Limbaugh’s politics, what’s at stake is the fallout of a society tolerating toxic, hate-inciting speech. For 20 years, Limbaugh has hidden behind the First Amendment, or else claimed he’s really “doing humor” or “entertainment.” He is indeed constitutionally entitled to his opinions, but he is not constitutionally entitled to the people’s airways. It’s time for the public to take back our broadcast resources. Limbaugh has had decades to fix his show. Now it’s up to us.”

Fonda And Steinem Want Limbaugh Off The Air
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • Jim

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

  • http://WebProNews Martha Guice

    Rush Limbaugh may be entitled to his 1st Amendment Rights, however, his targets are protected by laws against slander, libel and defamation of chracter. It seems that Mr. Limbaugh is especially targeting young, educated, single women as a personal bias, since Rush has a history of peversity toward women – he should look to his own maladies and personal abberations.

  • Esther Rogers

    I totally agree,this perverted sexual commentary of Limbaugh’s should not be condoned.

    Is it not illegal to solicit pornography in order that he could watch online? He specifically requested that she post a video of herself and others having sex on line, insisting that he would accept that as payment for funding her cause. If this isn’t soliciting, what is!

  • R

    Funny how you want to squelch speech of one individual but not the other. A certain ‘comedian’ but actually a political commentator can make very ugly and disturbing comments about someone from another party but is dismissed because they claim he is a comedian!
    How shameful

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom